Some looked at the business aspect of it:
It's not hard to see why Facebook wants to dominate news. There must be thousands of dollars in profits at stake.
— Joseph Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) May 13, 2015
And what does it say that they might hesitate to.
— Christopher Mims (@mims) May 13, 2015
Data, revenue share, branding, "wait a minute, another CMS?" —Publishers top concerns in negotiations with Facebook on Instant Articles.
— Jay Rosen (@jayrosen_nyu) May 13, 2015
Thoughts on FB instant article - Google must hate this, more content behind the walled Facebook garden. Why search for articles?
— Nicholas Dynan (@nicholasdynan) May 13, 2015
Other looked at how it can media:
@jayrosen_nyu an 8,000 word article is not what I would call "mobile optimized"
— Anthony De Rosa (@AntDeRosa) May 13, 2015
@noahchestnut I'd have to imagine it'll link to other Instant Articles once there are more published. And that does sound interesting...
— Joseph Lichterman (@ylichterman) May 13, 2015
Some simply loved the fact that there was a conversation going on:
@jenleereeves I am giddy with excitement about the possibilities. I can't wait!!
— Virginia Ingram (@gingin) May 13, 2015
I'm kinda bummed that I missed last night's Media Twitter
— Joseph Lichterman (@ylichterman) May 13, 2015
And of course, the jokesters;
"Your article ‘Facebook Stock Plummets On Human Rights Controversy' did not comply with Facebook Instant Article standards" #BraveNewFuture
— Oliver Willis (@owillis) May 13, 2015
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Comments
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.