If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. — Sir Isaac Newton
Picking stocks is hard. Most academic research has shown that individuals stink at it. Many investors have painfully (re)learned this lesson in 2008 as stock markets collapsed around the globe.
That being said, would anyone deny that there are some people who are very good at stock picking? Just like any other profession, there are people who are experts in their field and these top professionals get paid handsomely for what they do.
Warren Buffett certainly comes to mind. Buffett is one of the most famous stock pickers of all time, and with an estimated net worth of more than $50 billion, he is also one of the richest people in the world. The 2009 Berkshire Hathaway annual report indicates that the per-share book value of
  Berkshire Hathaway has increased at a compounded annual rate of 20.3% since 1965. Compared to an average of 9.3% for the S&P 500 including dividends, the outperformance is striking (and the Buffett numbers are after-tax).
If someone told you that you could have your portfolio managed by Warren Buffett, you would be interested, right? Did you know you can actually look up any institutional fund’s holdings online (if they have more than $100 million of assets under management), including those of the aforementioned Warren Buffett?
But how many of you do that? Considering these fund managers often spend every waking and sleeping moment thinking and obsessing about the financial markets, are significantly more capitalized than you, and have access to far more resources than you do — wouldn’t that make sense? An investor could use the information as an idea farm and jumping off point for more research, or simply outsource their portfolio management to these managers.
Following is a brief overview of the process of following these top managers.
SEC 13Fs
In 1975 Congress passed Section 13(f ) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The measure required every institutional fund manager with assets under management over $ 100 million to report its holdings once a quarter to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Congress did this to improve the disclosure and transparency of these big firms with the hope of increasing confidence in the financial markets.
The name of the form is the “13F” (also referred to as the Form 13F - HR). The data is uploaded to the SEC web site no more than 45 days after the quarter’s end, and an investor can view the holdings free of charge. By reviewing the 13Fs, you can view and understand the holdings of every manager from George Soros, to Seth Klarman, to Carl Icahn, to Warren Buffett.
The SEC maintains the EDGAR database and posts the electronic versions of 13F f lings within a day after such filings are received. The data goes back to late 1999, although the archives in Washington, D.C., contain paper records that go back further.
All an investor has to do to retrieve the holdings is to visit the web site, and search under “Company Name” for the desired fund or company. In our first case study, we use “Berkshire Hathaway”(CIK # 0001067983) resulting in a laundry list of filings. We are interested in only the 13F filings, and the user can narrow down the list by inputting the “Form Type” provided (13F). All of the quarterly 13F filings are now at your fingertips. Since the 13Fs are published within 45 days after quarter end, the quarter that ended June 30, 2008, would be available around August 15, 2008. Examining the most recent 13F from Berkshire reveals a list of long - time Buffett holdings including American Express, Wells Fargo, and Coca-Cola. This information is indeed interesting, but can it be of any value?
Typically, the best investors to choose for this analysis are managers who employ long-term holding periods (in Buffett’s case he has stated that his favorite holding period is “forever”). This will minimize the effects high turnover would have on the portfolio, and the 45-day delay in reporting times should not be a major factor in performance. (The data is 45 days “ stale ” when you see it, and the manager may very well not even own the stock by the time the 13F is posted. Although we have found turnover to be a minor influence on performance.)
It is very important to backtest the managers' strategy in order to determine if it is appropriate for tracking. Many funds, such as the hugely successful Renaissance Technologies are not appropriate for trading due to their heavy involvement in derivatives. Many people follow their moves even though it does not offer any benefit to do so.
We believe that the major value added in the investment process from these managers is in stock picking and not in investment timing. The portfolios we will track are long-only. While most hedge funds short and/or use derivatives to hedge or leverage their ideas, these positions do not show up on the 13F filing (nor do international positions).
The simple methodology we are going to use is as follows:
- Download all of the 13F quarterly filings.
- If there are more than 10 holdings, simply use the 10 largest holdings, as the majority of a manager’s performance should be driven by his largest holdings.
- Equal-weight the 10 holdings.
- Rebalance, add/delete holdings quarterly, and calculate performance as of the 20th of the month to allow for all filings to arrive.
Following this process for backtesting manually will take an entire day using a simple strategy like the top 10 holdings (it took us a month to backtest 10 funds by hand about two years ago). Your analysis will also likely have survivor bias because historical prices for delisted stocks are not readily available. To accurately calculate returns, we included the portfolio effects of all stocks that are no longer traded due to delistings, buyouts, mergers, bankruptcies, and so on. We also include all dividends (cash, stock, special, etc.). Often, databases and backtesting software packages do not account for stocks no longer trading, which can heavily skew results.  AlphaClone automates this process by instantly backtesting even the most complex multi-fund strategies.
The Buffett Clone
OK, enough already.  How does one do following Buffett's stock picks?  From AlphaClone, below are the results of following Buffett's ten largest holdings from 11/2000 to 4/30/2010.  The Buffett "clone" portfolio invests in his 10 largest holdings equal-weighted and rebalanced quarterly is compared to the returns to the broad U.S. market (S&P 500 with dividends). Buffett's current clone portfolio holdings are:
- Wells Fargo (WFC)
- Coca-Cola (KO)
- Proctor and Gamble (PG)
- Conoco Phillips (COP)
- WalMart (WMT)
- American Express (AXP)
- Kraft (KFT)
- Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)
- US Bancorp (USB)
- Wesco (WSC)
The first observation is how dismal the returns have been for stocks this decade. Â Zero return with over 50% drawdown is depressing indeed.Â
BUFFETT
- Annualized Return: 8.9%
- Volatility: Â 15.4%
- Max Drawdown (maximum peak to valley decline): Â -43%
S&P 500
- Annualized Return: Â Â 0%
- Volatility: Â Â 16%
- Max Drawdown:Â Â Â Â Â -50.9%
Buffet returns nearly 9% a year, which doesn't sound that spectacular but it beats the market by more than 9% per year with volatility less than the market. $100,000 invested in the Buffett portfolio would be worth approximately $240,000 today vs. the same $100,000 invested in the S&P500.
(There are plenty of clone portfolios with much better numbers, but we are using Buffett as an example as most are familiar with him and we don't want to look like we are cherry-picking a fund.)
(Click on the chart to enlarge.)
About 85% of Buffet's portfolio is concentrated in his top ten holdings. Volatility was low, surprising given that the portfolio contained only 10 holdings. If you ran a mutual fund with these numbers you would probably be one of the best performing mangers OF ALL TIME over the time period.
A recent academic paper has examined the strategy for Buffett all the way back to 1976 and found results consistent with ours. From the abstract:
"Contrary to popular belief, we find Berkshire Hathaway invests primarily in large-cap growth rather than "value" stocks. Over the period the portfolio beat the benchmarks in 27 out of 31 years, on average exceeding the S&P 500 Index by 11.14%. We find that Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio is concentrated in relatively few stocks with the top five holdings averaging 73% of the portfolio value. While increased volatility is normally associated with higher concentration we show the volatility of the portfolio is driven by large positive returns and not downside risk."
Now that we have shown that the process can work for a single manager, how about "cloning" multiple managers as a group? Â Below we examine this "fund-of-funds" approach applied to the progeny of one of the best hedge fund "seeders" of all time, Julian Robertson's Tiger Management.
Catching a Tiger
If you had to name the top hedge fund managers ever, Julian H. Robertson would certainly be on the list. Robertson successfully ran the Tiger Funds for many years, and an entire book is written about Robertson (Julian Robertson: A Tiger in the Land of Bulls and Bears). The Tiger Funds reached a peak of $22 billion in assets in 1998. After many years of strong outperformance, Robertson shifted his focus from portfolio management to incubating or "seeding" young managers or "tiger cubs". He proved just as a adept at picking managers as he was at picking stocks and now having worked at a Tiger fund is like possessing the hedge fund gold seal of approval. Many of the Tiger progeny follow the classic value-added research based on detailed fundamental research and are amongst the world most successful hedge fund managers.
 Two of the "Tiger Seeds" with the longest and best records are Bill Hwang of Tiger Asia and Chase Coleman of Tiger Global, each of whom were in the original group of new funds to set up shop at Tiger's office at 101 Park Avenue near Grand Central Station in midtown Manhattan. Hwang's fund returned 55% in 2007 before fees and has a seven-year average of 40.4%. Coleman made a gross return of 91% for Tiger Global in 2007 and his seven-year average return is 43.7%."
Not bad. How would a "cloning" approach work for these funds as a group? Since we can't imagine ever doing this again by hand, thankfully AlphaClone automates it. Â Since for Buffett, we examined a method of following his top holdings, let's look at a different clone strategy here.
Out of the 20 funds that comprise this custom fund group, what if we selected the 10 most popular holdings? The theory being, when a number of the Tiger Cubs all like a stock, maybe there is something to the story? This is an example of a backtest that would be near impossible without AlphaClone.
This strategy is called the Tiger Cubs Top10 Popularity strategy and it's current portfolio holdings include:
- Apple Inc (APPL)
- Visa (V)
- DirecTV (DTV)
- Mastercard (MA)
- Monsanto (MON)
- JP Morgan (JPM)
- Wells Fargo (WFC)
- Qualcomm (QCOM)
- Google (GOOG)
- Amazon (AMZN)
Investing quarterly in the top 10 most popular stocks from 2000-4/29/2010 would have returned:
Tiger Cubs
- Annualized Return: 9.3%
- Volatility: 24.2%
- Max Drawdown: -54.2%
S&P 500
- Annualized Return: 0%
- Volatility: 16%
- Max Drawdown: -50.9%
The Cubs clone outperforms the market by about 9% a year, but with more volatility and similar drawdowns. Â That means $100,000 invested in 2000 would be worth $250,000 today vs. the same $100,000 if invested in the S&P500 Index. Â But let's say you were willing to give up some of the stellar upside returns in exchange for reducing volatility in the clone. Â With AlphaClone you can instantly run "hedged" simulations on any clone. Â The hedge is very simple and assumes you are simply shorting the S&P500 index - which you can do by simply buying the ProShares Short S&P500 ETF, ticker SH. Here's this clone's performance when hedged 100% (market neutral):
Tiger Cubs
- Annualized Return: 9.7%
- Volatility: 16%
- Max Drawdown: -22.3%
Follow the Smart Money
AlphaClone's mission is to make it easy for investors to benefit from the stock picking prowess of the world's top investment managers. It allows you to access dozens of multi-fund clones constructed around investment themes such as Value Masters, Activist Masters, ETF Ideas, International stocks and High Conviction hedge funds. Â With AlphaClone you can answer to fundamental questions:
- What are the top investors doing?
- How can I take advantage of this knowledge?
Our web-delivered investment research service enables investors to intelligently apply the stock ideas of top hedge fund and institutional money managers. AlphaClone is the first service to provide professional-grade backtests of investment cloning strategies.
We include data on over 280 managers and enable investors to combine managers and apply several cloning strategies. Subscribers can also:
- View clone performance annually or across several date spans
- Compare performance over time against several indexes
- View current and past holdings for each clone
- View recent trade activity for each clone
- Download a spreadsheet for any clone to view monthly return streams
- Hedge a clone portfolio and view back-tested performance
- Customize clones by changing the number of holdings and/or rebalance method
- Select which sectors and/or cap groups to include/exclude in the cloning process
- Clone your own fund groups
Our intuitive service makes cloning easy and fun. See for yourself with a free 14-day trial.
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Comments
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.