In October, Personal Income rose 0.5%, a nice improvement over the 0.0% change in September, and matching the 0.5% increase in August. It was also above the consensus expectation of a 0.4% increase.
In addition, we got upward revisions to both the September and August numbers of +0.1 each. Meanwhile, Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) rose by 0.4%, lower than the consensus expectation of a 0.6% rise. That is an acceleration from the 0.3% rise in September but below the rise of 0.5% in August. Of course, if income is rising faster than spending, it means that the savings rate is rising. It rose to 5.7% from 5.6%.
Over the long run, a higher savings rate is good for the country, and is desperately needed as the savings rate has been in more or less a constant secular decline for the last 30 years. Without domestic savings, we have to borrow from abroad to invest in the economy.
Capital imports are the flip side of the trade deficit. If we sell less abroad than we buy, then we go into debt abroad. That is the same thing as importing capital.
The chronically low savings rate has left our country trillions of dollars in debt to the rest of the world. Note that in the 1960's and 1970's the savings rate was normally around 9 or 10%, and started a long secular decline after the 1982-83 recession.
Prior to the 1980's, the U.S. was the world's largest creditor nation by a large margin. Now we are by far the world's largest debtor. The fall in the savings rate, and the increase in our indebtedness is not a coincidence, it s a causal relationship.
In the short run, on the other hand, a rising savings rate slows down economic growth. If someone gets a raise but does not spend more, then that raise does not stimulate other economic activity. If the raise is not spent, then there is no increase in aggregate demand. It either increases future potential demand, or pays for demand that occurred in the past (i.e. debt is paid down). Staying home, instead of going out to eat, means that there is less work for waiters and cooks.
The desire of consumers to sit on their wallets and not increase income spending is very understandable. The collapse of housing prices destroyed trillions of dollars of wealth. That wealth people had been planning on using to finance their retirements or put the kids through college. Now that money has to be replenished the hard way, by spending less than you earn.
Note how the savings rate tends to rise during recessions. The very fact that more people decide to save is one of the reasons recessions are, well, recessionary. While on an individual basis being thrifty is a good thing, so is paying down your debt. However, if everyone decides to do it at the same time, it is a very bad thing. This is what Lord Keynes called “The Paradox of Thrift.” It is the change in the savings rate, not the level that causes the pain.
Unfortunately, there is no way to go from a low savings rate to a high savings rate without the savings rate rising. This month's numbers indicate we are doing it in the least painful way, with a healthy rise in income that is bigger than a solid rise in spending. The rise in the savings rate during the Great Recession was very rapid, and was one of the key reasons the recession was so severe.
We are still a long way from the sort of savings rate we had back in the 1960's and 1970's, but we are a lot closer than we were a few years ago. Slowly people are making progress on repairing their balance sheets, or at least they have over the last year or so. That progress, however, could be greatly undermined if the price of houses starts to go south again.
Medium-Quality Personal Income
The increase in Personal Income, while better than expected, was of only medium quality. In total, personal income rose by $57.6 billion, an huge turnaround from a decline of $2.8 billion in September (seasonally adjusted annual rates, as are all the subsequent numbers on the components of personal income).
In October, private sector wages rose by $32.2 billion, up from a $8.0 billion increase in September. Wages in the goods producing sector increased by $5.5 billion in August, up from a $0.1 billion decline in September. Wages in the private service sector were up $27.6 billion versus an increase of $8.2 billion in September. Overall government wages rose by $2.5 billion after falling $4.6 billion in September.
Private wages and salaries are the most important, and highest quality, form of personal income. Government wages have to be paid out of either taxes or government deficits. Government workers do, however, spend their money in the private sector, just like private sector workers do.
Proprietors' Income
Another important source of personal income is proprietors' income. In other words, what the self-employed and small businesses were earning. That increased by $9.9 billion in October, on top of a $4.9 billion increase in September.
However, most of that came from down on the farm, due to big increases in agricultural commodity prices. Farm proprietors incomes rose by $5.3 billion, on top of a $3.6 billion increase in September.
The overall strength down on the farm helps explain why the Great Plains states like the Dakotas and Nebraska are weathering the downturn so much better than the rest of the country. It is also a good sign for firms that are tied to the farm economy, such as Deere (DE) and Potash (POT).
Non-farm proprietors' income rose by $4.5 billion, after rising $1.3 billion in September. In other words, what we normally think of as small business income is showing signs of getting back on track. Farm proprietors income is tiny relative to non-farm at just $56.3 billion versus $1.018 trillion. Since June, Farm income is up a stunning 39.7%. (Perhaps Willie Nelson needs to find another beneficiary of benefit concerts.)
Rental Income
Rental income rose by $ 1.6 billion in October, down from a $3.5 billion increase in September. Weakness in rental income is not surprising given the very high vacancy rates that still prevail in most areas of the country for both residential and non-residential properties.
Capital Income
Capital income, or income from dividends and interest, rose by $6.9 billion in September after it plunged by $4.9 billion in September. This is the dark side of the low interest rate environment we are in.
This income is particularly important to retirees. They are finding that as their bonds and CD's mature, they have to reinvest the proceeds at lower and lower rates. The backing up in interest rates over the last month seems to reversed this a bit. Interest income actually increased by $11.5 billion, reversing a 10.7 billion decline in September.
On the other hand, dividend income actually fell $4.6 billion after rising $5.8 billion in September. The decline in dividend income is somewhat surprising, since I have seen very few dividend cuts or eliminations in recent months, and many significant dividend increases and even initiations (for example Cisco, CSCO). Since March, though, interest income is down $19.8 billion while dividend income is up $15.9 billion.
Government Transfers
The final big component of personal income is government transfer payments. Like government salaries, this source of income has to come from either taxes or increased deficits, so it is a less desirable source of personal income from the point of view of the economy as a whole.
However, it is still income that gets spent in the economy. Wal-Mart (WMT) really doesn't care if the money spent in its stores is from the elderly using their Social Security checks or the dividends they get from their investments, or really if it is retirees shopping there or people still in their working years spending their wages, or their unemployment benefits for that matter.
Transfer payments were a big swing factor this month, rising $3.3 billion in October, after falling $12.1 billion in September. Unemployment benefit income, though, has been falling rapidly, dropping $5.4 billion in October after a $17.2 billion drop in September.
Over the long term, though, the economy cannot simply grow through ever increasing amounts of money being handed out by the government. Those payments are very useful in the short run to help hold up overall consumer spending when the economy has turned soft. But in the long run, the economy needs income from wages and salaries, and from small businesses earning profits. It is those earnings and profits that pay the taxes that support the transfer payments.
It is, then, worth looking at personal income excluding transfer payments, as shown in the second graph (also from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/). Since it is a long-term graph, inflation plays a much bigger role over time, and the graph is based on real personal income rather than nominal (which the rest of the numbers in this post are based on). Not that during most recessions (and the immediate aftermath) incomes excluding transfer payments flatten out, but do not fall significantly.
The Great Recession was very different in that regard with income ex-transfer payments falling by about 7%. We are now starting to see a very tentative recovery in it.
A Good Report, Overall
Both Income and Spending were up more than expected, and accelerated from previous months. The quality of the income growth, on the other hand, was just OK. Private salaries showed about the same pace of increase as last month. There was a big positive swing in non-farm proprietors' income.
On the other hand, a big part of the increase came from transfer payments. While that is still income that people can spend, and it is income that goes to those who are generally in most desperate need of it, it ultimately has to come from either taxes or deficit spending.
Not a great report, but a marginally positive one, and we will take what ever good news on the economy we can get. The big increase in PCE, rising $41.3 billion in August on top of a $41.4 billion increase in July (but after falling at a $4.0 annual rate in June) means that the consumer is likely to add to GDP growth in the third quarter (as the third graph shows, (also from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/), probably about at a 2.0% rate.
Since PCE makes up over 70% of the whole economy, having PCE growing rather than shrinking is extremely important. Since we are not going to get a lot of support from the other areas of the economy, particularly residential investment and business investment in structures, as well as government spending, if the economy is going to grow at all in the third quarter, it will need a good showing from the consumer. So far so good on that front, but we only have two thirds of the picture.
Zacks Investment Research
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIsIn addition, we got upward revisions to both the September and August numbers of +0.1 each. Meanwhile, Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) rose by 0.4%, lower than the consensus expectation of a 0.6% rise. That is an acceleration from the 0.3% rise in September but below the rise of 0.5% in August. Of course, if income is rising faster than spending, it means that the savings rate is rising. It rose to 5.7% from 5.6%.
Over the long run, a higher savings rate is good for the country, and is desperately needed as the savings rate has been in more or less a constant secular decline for the last 30 years. Without domestic savings, we have to borrow from abroad to invest in the economy.
Capital imports are the flip side of the trade deficit. If we sell less abroad than we buy, then we go into debt abroad. That is the same thing as importing capital.
The chronically low savings rate has left our country trillions of dollars in debt to the rest of the world. Note that in the 1960's and 1970's the savings rate was normally around 9 or 10%, and started a long secular decline after the 1982-83 recession.
Prior to the 1980's, the U.S. was the world's largest creditor nation by a large margin. Now we are by far the world's largest debtor. The fall in the savings rate, and the increase in our indebtedness is not a coincidence, it s a causal relationship.
In the short run, on the other hand, a rising savings rate slows down economic growth. If someone gets a raise but does not spend more, then that raise does not stimulate other economic activity. If the raise is not spent, then there is no increase in aggregate demand. It either increases future potential demand, or pays for demand that occurred in the past (i.e. debt is paid down). Staying home, instead of going out to eat, means that there is less work for waiters and cooks.
The desire of consumers to sit on their wallets and not increase income spending is very understandable. The collapse of housing prices destroyed trillions of dollars of wealth. That wealth people had been planning on using to finance their retirements or put the kids through college. Now that money has to be replenished the hard way, by spending less than you earn.
Note how the savings rate tends to rise during recessions. The very fact that more people decide to save is one of the reasons recessions are, well, recessionary. While on an individual basis being thrifty is a good thing, so is paying down your debt. However, if everyone decides to do it at the same time, it is a very bad thing. This is what Lord Keynes called “The Paradox of Thrift.” It is the change in the savings rate, not the level that causes the pain.
Unfortunately, there is no way to go from a low savings rate to a high savings rate without the savings rate rising. This month's numbers indicate we are doing it in the least painful way, with a healthy rise in income that is bigger than a solid rise in spending. The rise in the savings rate during the Great Recession was very rapid, and was one of the key reasons the recession was so severe.
We are still a long way from the sort of savings rate we had back in the 1960's and 1970's, but we are a lot closer than we were a few years ago. Slowly people are making progress on repairing their balance sheets, or at least they have over the last year or so. That progress, however, could be greatly undermined if the price of houses starts to go south again.
Medium-Quality Personal Income
The increase in Personal Income, while better than expected, was of only medium quality. In total, personal income rose by $57.6 billion, an huge turnaround from a decline of $2.8 billion in September (seasonally adjusted annual rates, as are all the subsequent numbers on the components of personal income).
In October, private sector wages rose by $32.2 billion, up from a $8.0 billion increase in September. Wages in the goods producing sector increased by $5.5 billion in August, up from a $0.1 billion decline in September. Wages in the private service sector were up $27.6 billion versus an increase of $8.2 billion in September. Overall government wages rose by $2.5 billion after falling $4.6 billion in September.
Private wages and salaries are the most important, and highest quality, form of personal income. Government wages have to be paid out of either taxes or government deficits. Government workers do, however, spend their money in the private sector, just like private sector workers do.
Proprietors' Income
Another important source of personal income is proprietors' income. In other words, what the self-employed and small businesses were earning. That increased by $9.9 billion in October, on top of a $4.9 billion increase in September.
However, most of that came from down on the farm, due to big increases in agricultural commodity prices. Farm proprietors incomes rose by $5.3 billion, on top of a $3.6 billion increase in September.
The overall strength down on the farm helps explain why the Great Plains states like the Dakotas and Nebraska are weathering the downturn so much better than the rest of the country. It is also a good sign for firms that are tied to the farm economy, such as Deere (DE) and Potash (POT).
Non-farm proprietors' income rose by $4.5 billion, after rising $1.3 billion in September. In other words, what we normally think of as small business income is showing signs of getting back on track. Farm proprietors income is tiny relative to non-farm at just $56.3 billion versus $1.018 trillion. Since June, Farm income is up a stunning 39.7%. (Perhaps Willie Nelson needs to find another beneficiary of benefit concerts.)
Rental Income
Rental income rose by $ 1.6 billion in October, down from a $3.5 billion increase in September. Weakness in rental income is not surprising given the very high vacancy rates that still prevail in most areas of the country for both residential and non-residential properties.
Capital Income
Capital income, or income from dividends and interest, rose by $6.9 billion in September after it plunged by $4.9 billion in September. This is the dark side of the low interest rate environment we are in.
This income is particularly important to retirees. They are finding that as their bonds and CD's mature, they have to reinvest the proceeds at lower and lower rates. The backing up in interest rates over the last month seems to reversed this a bit. Interest income actually increased by $11.5 billion, reversing a 10.7 billion decline in September.
On the other hand, dividend income actually fell $4.6 billion after rising $5.8 billion in September. The decline in dividend income is somewhat surprising, since I have seen very few dividend cuts or eliminations in recent months, and many significant dividend increases and even initiations (for example Cisco, CSCO). Since March, though, interest income is down $19.8 billion while dividend income is up $15.9 billion.
Government Transfers
The final big component of personal income is government transfer payments. Like government salaries, this source of income has to come from either taxes or increased deficits, so it is a less desirable source of personal income from the point of view of the economy as a whole.
However, it is still income that gets spent in the economy. Wal-Mart (WMT) really doesn't care if the money spent in its stores is from the elderly using their Social Security checks or the dividends they get from their investments, or really if it is retirees shopping there or people still in their working years spending their wages, or their unemployment benefits for that matter.
Transfer payments were a big swing factor this month, rising $3.3 billion in October, after falling $12.1 billion in September. Unemployment benefit income, though, has been falling rapidly, dropping $5.4 billion in October after a $17.2 billion drop in September.
Over the long term, though, the economy cannot simply grow through ever increasing amounts of money being handed out by the government. Those payments are very useful in the short run to help hold up overall consumer spending when the economy has turned soft. But in the long run, the economy needs income from wages and salaries, and from small businesses earning profits. It is those earnings and profits that pay the taxes that support the transfer payments.
It is, then, worth looking at personal income excluding transfer payments, as shown in the second graph (also from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/). Since it is a long-term graph, inflation plays a much bigger role over time, and the graph is based on real personal income rather than nominal (which the rest of the numbers in this post are based on). Not that during most recessions (and the immediate aftermath) incomes excluding transfer payments flatten out, but do not fall significantly.
The Great Recession was very different in that regard with income ex-transfer payments falling by about 7%. We are now starting to see a very tentative recovery in it.
A Good Report, Overall
Both Income and Spending were up more than expected, and accelerated from previous months. The quality of the income growth, on the other hand, was just OK. Private salaries showed about the same pace of increase as last month. There was a big positive swing in non-farm proprietors' income.
On the other hand, a big part of the increase came from transfer payments. While that is still income that people can spend, and it is income that goes to those who are generally in most desperate need of it, it ultimately has to come from either taxes or deficit spending.
Not a great report, but a marginally positive one, and we will take what ever good news on the economy we can get. The big increase in PCE, rising $41.3 billion in August on top of a $41.4 billion increase in July (but after falling at a $4.0 annual rate in June) means that the consumer is likely to add to GDP growth in the third quarter (as the third graph shows, (also from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/), probably about at a 2.0% rate.
Since PCE makes up over 70% of the whole economy, having PCE growing rather than shrinking is extremely important. Since we are not going to get a lot of support from the other areas of the economy, particularly residential investment and business investment in structures, as well as government spending, if the economy is going to grow at all in the third quarter, it will need a good showing from the consumer. So far so good on that front, but we only have two thirds of the picture.
Zacks Investment Research
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Comments
Loading...
Posted In: FinancialsMortgage REIT's
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.
Join Now: Free!
Already a member?Sign in
