DEA Sets Stage For Marijuana Rescheduling With December 2 Hearing

Zinger Key Points
  • DEA to hold hearing on rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III on December 2, focusing on logistics, not testimonies.
  • Debate intensifies, with bipartisan opposition and concerns over DEA's commitment to the initiative.
  • Rescheduling could ease cannabis research, federal tax deductions, but stops short of legalization.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) will hold its first hearing on December 2 to address the Biden administration’s proposal to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The hearing, announced through a public advisory on November 26, is procedural and will not include witness testimony. Instead, it will focus on logistical matters and future scheduling for merit-based discussions.

This pivotal rescheduling initiative could significantly impact cannabis research and industry operations, though it stops short of federal legalization. Moving marijuana to Schedule III would allow licensed cannabis businesses to claim federal tax deductions under Section 280E of the IRS tax code, a long-sought reform. It would also remove some barriers to scientific research, though marijuana would remain subject to CSA regulations and applicable criminal prohibitions.

A Divisive Proposal

The proposal has sparked debate across political and regulatory landscapes. While the DEA is officially listed as the “proponent” of the rule, questions persist regarding the agency's commitment to the initiative. Notably, it was Attorney General Merrick Garland, not DEA Administrator Anne Milgram, who signed the proposal—an unprecedented move that some interpret as signaling internal hesitancy.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which conducted the scientific review underpinning the rescheduling recommendation, declined the DEA’s request to provide witnesses for the hearing, according to Cannabis Business Times. This decision has fueled speculation about bureaucratic tensions and perceived gaps in interagency coordination.

See also: Trump’s ‘Go Wild On Health’ Plan Puts RFK Jr. In Charge: What It Means For Cannabis And Psychedelics Reform

In its prehearing statement, the DEA previewed testimony from its two selected witnesses: Heather Achbach, who will address rulemaking procedures, and Dr. Luli Akinfiresoye, a pharmacologist, who will provide insights into public health risks, marijuana potency and abuse patterns. However, the agency stopped short of revealing its stance on the proposed reclassification.

Congressional Scrutiny

The rescheduling process has drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers, particularly from Republican members of Congress. As Marijuana Moment reported, Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Representative Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) have expressed concerns about the transparency and motivations behind the Biden administration’s push for reform. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), have urged swift action, emphasizing the potential benefits for the cannabis industry and public health.

Opposition has also come in the form of allegations from pro-rescheduling advocates, who accuse the DEA of improper communications with prohibitionist groups, such as Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM). Both the DEA and SAM have denied these claims, with Administrative Law Judge John Mulrooney overseeing the proceedings and rejecting several motions to postpone the hearing.

The Road Ahead

Although the initial hearing is set to proceed, the evidentiary sessions have been postponed to early 2025, reflecting ongoing complexities in the process. Vice President Kamala Harris recently attributed delays to federal bureaucracy, calling for expedited action while reiterating the administration’s commitment to reform.

While rescheduling to Schedule III represents a significant shift, experts and lawmakers agree it is not a panacea. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has emphasized that this change would not federally legalize marijuana, leaving key issues like interstate commerce and criminal justice reform unresolved.

The outcome of the DEA's proceedings will have profound implications for the cannabis industry, research and federal drug policy. As the rescheduling debate unfolds, the Biden administration faces mounting pressure from both advocates and critics to deliver meaningful progress in cannabis reform.

Cover image made with AI

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In: CannabisGovernmentNewsPsychedelicsRegulationsAnne MilgramBill Cassidycannabis reschedulingChuck SchumerControlled Substance ActDepartment of Health and Human ServicesDoug LaMalfaDrug Enforcement AdministrationFederal Schedule IJohn MulrooneyKamala HarrisMerrick GarlandSmart Approaches to Marijuana
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!

Cannabis is evolving – don’t get left behind!

Curious about what’s next for the industry and how to leverage California’s unique market?

Join top executives, policymakers, and investors at the Benzinga Cannabis Market Spotlight in Anaheim, CA, at the House of Blues on November 12. Dive deep into the latest strategies, investment trends, and brand insights that are shaping the future of cannabis!

Get your tickets now to secure your spot and avoid last-minute price hikes.