"And I'm very proud of the 50,000 poll workers and election officials who delivered a free and fair election." — Kenneth Blackwell, Republican Ohio Secretary of State during 2004 election.
"We have found numerous, serious election irregularities in the Ohio presidential election, which resulted in a significant disenfranchisement of voters. Cumulatively, these irregularities, which affected hundreds of thousand of votes and voters in Ohio, raise grave doubts..." — Congressman John Conyers' Investigation into the 2004 Ohio Election.
It sure seems simple enough. Everyone gets a ballot. Everyone fills out the ballot. Every ballot is securely stored and then counted. The results are tabulated and a winner is declared. That's how it works in theory, with both major political parties providing observers and political pressure to ensure that neither side rigs an election, "loses" votes, counts votes for the wrong candidate, turns away valid voters, or in any way cheats the system. Yet, in 2004, each and every one of those things happened — leading directly to the re-election of George W. Bush. Did the conduct of Ken Blackwell, who certainly did everything in his power to rig the election for Bush, flip the result for Bush? Did the systematic disenfranchisement of thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of minority voters flip the election to Bush? Did Republican companies in charge of electronic ballots outright steal the election? Maybe. "Maybe" is about as good an answer as we're going to get here. Despite a court order not to do so, Ohio destroyed its 2004 ballots. The electronic votes never had a paper trail, so we'll never know if Mark Connell's testimony would have implicated the GOP and GOP companies in a massive vote-rigging scandal. (Mark Connell died in a mysterious plane crash right before he could testify. Of course...) And really, who wants to focus on an issue like vote fraud and outright stealing of a presidential election? It seems like the something destined for the realm of third-world banana republics and conspiracy websites. Hell, I've written one article on it and received some pretty impressive hate mail, wondering about my sanity, intelligence, and partisanship, among other things. I cannot imagine what Mark Crispin Miller and Bob Fitrakis, among others, have gone through in their pursuit of justice for the American people. Many of the people who have reached out to me have done so with one thought: where is the proof? That's a good question. Where is the proof? First, read the report put together by John Conyers' Congressional Committee, "What Went Wrong In Ohio: THE CONYERS REPORT ON THE 2004 PRESIDENT ELECTION". You can pick up a printed version on Amazon.com for about $15. Enterprising folks may find a bootleg PDF online. The Conyers Report lays out a damning case, particularly in the context of minority voters and voters in Kerry-favored, Democratic precincts. Among the key points are:
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs"We have found numerous, serious election irregularities in the Ohio presidential election, which resulted in a significant disenfranchisement of voters. Cumulatively, these irregularities, which affected hundreds of thousand of votes and voters in Ohio, raise grave doubts..." — Congressman John Conyers' Investigation into the 2004 Ohio Election.
It sure seems simple enough. Everyone gets a ballot. Everyone fills out the ballot. Every ballot is securely stored and then counted. The results are tabulated and a winner is declared. That's how it works in theory, with both major political parties providing observers and political pressure to ensure that neither side rigs an election, "loses" votes, counts votes for the wrong candidate, turns away valid voters, or in any way cheats the system. Yet, in 2004, each and every one of those things happened — leading directly to the re-election of George W. Bush. Did the conduct of Ken Blackwell, who certainly did everything in his power to rig the election for Bush, flip the result for Bush? Did the systematic disenfranchisement of thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of minority voters flip the election to Bush? Did Republican companies in charge of electronic ballots outright steal the election? Maybe. "Maybe" is about as good an answer as we're going to get here. Despite a court order not to do so, Ohio destroyed its 2004 ballots. The electronic votes never had a paper trail, so we'll never know if Mark Connell's testimony would have implicated the GOP and GOP companies in a massive vote-rigging scandal. (Mark Connell died in a mysterious plane crash right before he could testify. Of course...) And really, who wants to focus on an issue like vote fraud and outright stealing of a presidential election? It seems like the something destined for the realm of third-world banana republics and conspiracy websites. Hell, I've written one article on it and received some pretty impressive hate mail, wondering about my sanity, intelligence, and partisanship, among other things. I cannot imagine what Mark Crispin Miller and Bob Fitrakis, among others, have gone through in their pursuit of justice for the American people. Many of the people who have reached out to me have done so with one thought: where is the proof? That's a good question. Where is the proof? First, read the report put together by John Conyers' Congressional Committee, "What Went Wrong In Ohio: THE CONYERS REPORT ON THE 2004 PRESIDENT ELECTION". You can pick up a printed version on Amazon.com for about $15. Enterprising folks may find a bootleg PDF online. The Conyers Report lays out a damning case, particularly in the context of minority voters and voters in Kerry-favored, Democratic precincts. Among the key points are:
- Democratic (particularly minority) precincts received significantly fewer voting machines per voter than Republican ones, leading to long lines and potentially thousands of democratic voters who left without voting.
- Blackwell and the Ohio Republican Party changed the way provisional ballots are distributed, skewing results in their favor by, once again, eliminating thousands of Democratic and minority voters.
- The Republican Party almost exclusively challenged the votes of minority voters, a violation of almost every federal election law written since Abraham Lincoln. Targeting one minority for extra scrutiny is a violation of federal law.
- Machine malfunctions, machine irregularities, votes for one candidate counting for an opposing candidate — these all plagued the 2004 Ohio election. They also went significantly in favor of the GOP and Bush and worked against Kerry and the Democrats. (The Conyers Report lays out several cases of precincts where votes were clearly manufactured and others where they were clearly deleted; again, to the benefit of the GOP.)
- Exit polls showed Kerry not only won Ohio, but won fairly convincingly. While that isn't proof, it's pretty damning, considering the rest of the world uses exit polling to determine if an election is fraudulent or not. In other words, if what happened in Ohio had happened in Afghanistan, we would invalidate that election as fraudulent. In the USA? We call that candidate the winner, without any real investigation into the discrepancy until after the fact.
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Comments
Loading...
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.
Join Now: Free!
Already a member?Sign in