Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Dodges Personal Liability In Child Social Media Addiction Lawsuits: Federal Judge Cites Lack Of Evidence

Meta Platforms Inc. META CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been absolved of personal liability in 25 lawsuits accusing his company of causing social media addiction in children.

What Happened: On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dismissed claims that Zuckerberg was personally responsible for Meta's alleged concealment of mental health risks associated with children's use of Facebook and Instagram, reported Reuters.

The plaintiffs had accused Zuckerberg of ignoring internal warnings about the risks and publicly downplaying them.

However, Judge Rogers found the accusations lacking in specific details about Zuckerberg’s wrongdoing.

See Also: After OpenAI And Perplexity, AI Startup Anthropic May Secure Another Massive Investment — Amazon Reportedly Considers Major Funding

She stated that “control of corporate activity alone is insufficient” to establish liability. This decision does not impact related claims against Meta itself.

The lawsuits were filed under the laws of 13 U.S. states, including Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Previn Warren, a partner at Motley Rice representing the plaintiffs, stated that his clients will continue to gather evidence “to uncover the truth about how Big Tech has knowingly prioritized profits over the safety of our children.”

Subscribe to the Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter to get all the latest tech developments delivered to your inbox.

Why It Matters: Last year, in a court filing, it was revealed that Zuckerberg was warned about social media addiction among teenagers.

Earlier this year in February, Zuckerberg, in a court appearance, argued against being personally liable in these lawsuits.

The Meta CEO’s attorneys contended that it is a core principle that individuals cannot be held personally accountable for a corporation’s actions or omissions simply due to their roles as executives, directors, or shareholders.

Later in April 2024, a judge partially dismissed claims against Zuckerberg in these lawsuits. At the time, Judge Rogers ruled that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that Zuckerberg had a personal obligation to disclose the risks associated with Meta's products based on his knowledge.

Last month, Meta reported third-quarter revenue of $40.59 billion, surpassing analyst expectations of $40.29 billion. The company also reported adjusted earnings of $6.03 per share, exceeding the consensus estimate of $5.25 per share.

Price Action: Meta shares closed Friday's session down 0.40% at $589.34. In after-hours trading, the stock declined further, reaching $588.16 at the time of writing, according to Benzinga Pro data.

Check out more of Benzinga’s Consumer Tech coverage by following this link.

Read Next:

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Photo courtesy: Brian Solis via Flickr

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In: NewsSocial MediaLegalTechMediabenzinga neuroConsumer TechFacebookInstagramlawsuitMark Zuckerbergsocial mediaStories That Matter
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!