In Minnesota, adults over 21 can legally use and possess cannabis. Despite this state law, cannabis remains a federally controlled substance. This legal dichotomy poses significant risks for non-U.S. citizens, including those holding green cards or other legal immigration statuses.
Federal Vs. State Laws: A Confusing Landscape
Julia Decker, policy director at the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota, emphasizes the critical difference for immigrants. According to MPR News, she notes that engaging in any activity related to cannabis can lead to immigration consequences under federal law, even in states where it’s legalized. This could include severe repercussions like deportation, despite no criminal conviction at the state level.
Linus Chan, a Clinical Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School, echoes these concerns. He points out that the dissonance between state and federal law creates confusion, even among attorneys. For instance, a state-level expungement of a cannabis conviction might hold no weight under federal law, especially in immigration contexts.
Gray Areas And Outdated Immigration Laws
The implications extend beyond clear legal violations. Decker mentions that immigration applications often inquire about uncharged or unconvicted criminal acts, which could include state-legal cannabis activities.
Chan points out that current immigration laws, rooted in standards from the mid-90s, do not accommodate modern developments like medically prescribed cannabis or employment at dispensaries. This outdated legal framework contributes to the unequal treatment of non-citizens regarding cannabis-related activities
The Impact On Naturalization And Deportation Risks
While a cannabis conviction does not automatically hinder naturalization or trigger deportation, the risks are notably higher for non-citizens. Chan and Decker advise that the arbitrary nature of these laws often results in unequal standards for citizens and non-citizens. They recommend that those navigating the immigration system seek advice from an immigration lawyer, particularly in states like Minnesota where cannabis laws are evolving.
The disparity between state and federal laws creates a precarious situation, underscoring the need for informed legal guidance and potential reform in immigration policies.
Photo: Courtesy of Ramdlon, ganjaspliffstoreuk by Pixabay
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Comments
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.
Cannabis rescheduling seems to be right around the corner
Want to understand what this means for the future of the industry? Hear directly for top executives, investors and policymakers at the 19th Benzinga Cannabis Capital Conference, coming to Chicago this Oct. 8-9. Get your tickets now before prices surge by following this link.