Hunter Biden Lawyer Wants Gun Charges Dismissed, Highlighting Cannabis And Firearms Controversy

Zinger Key Points
  • Hunter Biden’s lawyers filed a motion to dismiss gun possession charges against him.
  • A federal appeals court ruled in August that a ban preventing people who use marijuana from possessing firearms is unconstitutional.
  • Justice Department attorneys filed a brief in November, arguing that prohibition on firearms for marijuana users is reasonable.

Hunter Biden’s lawyers filed a motion Monday to dismiss a case against him over gun possession charges, in which they used a cannabis connection to argue discriminatory enforcement of the law.

In June, Biden was the subject of a Just Department investigation examining his gun possession in 2018, at the time when he was using illicit drugs.

Biden's attorneys argue that the gun charges violate the Second Amendment and represent a politically motivated prosecution over a law that is seldom enforced, barring people who use currently illicit drugs from buying or possessing firearms, writes Marijuana Moment.

“The accuracy of Special Counsel Weiss’s alleged acknowledgment that an ordinary citizen

 would not be prosecuted for this offense is borne out by DOJ’s policy and statistical evidence,” the motion reads. “Sections 922(g)(3) is very broad (unconstitutionally so), covering millions (if not tens of millions)of gun owners who use substances controlled under federal law, including marijuana, even if those drugs are legal at the state level.91 Yet they are almost never used. In years 2008–2017, for example, of the 132,464 criminal prosecutions under federal gun statutes, only 1.8% were brought under Section 922(g)(3).92.”

Marijuana And Guns…A Complex Issue

The question of whether it is unconstitutional to ban marijuana users from possessing firearms has been raised and debated in court on a regular basis over the last several of years. A federal appeals court ruled in August that the ban preventing people who use marijuana from possessing firearms is unconstitutional

Meanwhile, attorneys representing the Justice Department filed a brief in November with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit arguing that the prohibition on firearms for marijuana users is reasonable, citing historical parallels to limitations placed on the mentally ill and those with chronic alcohol problems during the era when the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791. 

According to a 2019 FBI memo that was recently brought to light by the New York Times, medical marijuana growers and caregivers are permitted to own guns, but patients are not.

Photo: Benzinga edit with images from Shutterstock, Nicole Pineda from Pixabay and Sora Shimazaki via Pexels

 

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In:
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!

Cannabis is evolving – don’t get left behind!

Curious about what’s next for the industry and how to leverage California’s unique market?

Join top executives, policymakers, and investors at the Benzinga Cannabis Market Spotlight in Anaheim, CA, at the House of Blues on November 12. Dive deep into the latest strategies, investment trends, and brand insights that are shaping the future of cannabis!

Get your tickets now to secure your spot and avoid last-minute price hikes.