House Bill To Remove Cannabis As Obstacle To Fed Employment Faces Record-Keeping Complications

Zinger Key Points
  • A bipartisan bill aims to change how past cannabis use impacts federal job and security clearances eligibility.
  • Despite challenges of record retention, the legislation promises significant reform with negligible fiscal impact.

A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report released Friday highlights significant limitations in a House bill designed to modify federal employment and security clearances for people who have used cannabis in the past. The bipartisan legislation, spearheaded by Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Nancy Mace (R-SC), and Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) encountered obstacles due to existing federal record-keeping policies, rendering key provisions potentially ineffective.

Legislative Intent Vs. CBO’s Feasibility Analysis

Initially, the Cannabis Users' Restoration of Eligibility (CURE) Act, passed in September 2023, sought to eliminate past cannabis use as a disqualifier for federal employment or security clearances. However, the focus shifted to past cannabis use after committee amendments, reported Marijuana Moment. 

In this context, CBO’s analysis suggests that the bill’s intent, which is to review past denials may be unattainable. The report, signed by CBO’s director Phillip L. Swagel, says current laws dictate that records about security clearance and personnel eligibility are temporary and can be destroyed after a brief period, complicating the bill’s review process.

Limited Record Retention Hinders Bill’s Impact

According to the CBO, most agencies destroy files related to non-issued security clearances within a year. The maintenance period for personnel eligibility records varies by agency and usually lasts only a few years. This practice significantly reduces the agencies’ ability to review past disqualifications, undermining the bill’s intent to reassess decisions made based on cannabis use.

Modest Costs For A Modest Reform

The CBO estimates that the cost of implementing the CURE Act would be minimal, primarily because the necessary records for a comprehensive review are likely unavailable. The bill, therefore, represents a modest reform with negligible financial implications, contingent upon the specific record-keeping policies of each federal agency.

"While federal agencies may not have the records available to review every prior hiring decision and security clearance review, the CURE Act will still help thousands of applicants to fairly get jobs they are most qualified for and the security clearances they need to be hired," Rep. Jamie Raskin told Marijuana Moment.

Evolving Federal Cannabis Policy

The CURE Act has been altered by various amendments, including the removal of provisions for a public request website and a 90-day reconsideration window for denied applications due to cannabis use. While the bill faces limitations in addressing past injustices, it marks an important step towards aligning policy with evolving societal attitudes towards cannabis.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In: CannabisGovernmentRegulationsCannabis Users’ Restoration of Eligibility ActCongressional Budget OfficeCURE ActEarl BlumenauerJamie RaskinNancy MacePhillip Swagel
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!

Cannabis is evolving – don’t get left behind!

Curious about what’s next for the industry and how to leverage California’s unique market?

Join top executives, policymakers, and investors at the Benzinga Cannabis Market Spotlight in Anaheim, CA, at the House of Blues on November 12. Dive deep into the latest strategies, investment trends, and brand insights that are shaping the future of cannabis!

Get your tickets now to secure your spot and avoid last-minute price hikes.