Nevada's Supreme Court Could Change Classification Of Cannabis As Legal Tangle Heats Up

The Nevada Supreme Court is at the center of a legal discussion that could impact the classification of cannabis within the state.

This comes in the wake of the Nevada Board of Pharmacy’s maintenance of cannabis as a Schedule 1 substance. This designation places it alongside drugs considered to have no medical use, despite Nevada voters approving medicinal marijuana use in 2000 and recreational use in 2016.

The state’s highest court heard oral arguments on Tuesday, addressing whether this classification contradicts the constitutional amendment. During the proceedings, Justice Kris Pickering pointed out the disconnection between the state’s legislative advancements in cannabis legalization and its continued classification as a substance with high abuse potential and no recognized medical benefits.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nevada played a critical role in bringing this issue to the forefront, arguing that the Nevada Board of Pharmacy’s regulation of cannabis is unconstitutional. According to ACLU, the authority over cannabis regulation has been transferred to the Cannabis Compliance Board.

The Board of Pharmacy, a body within the executive branch, oversees pharmacies -entities that do not distribute cannabis and therefore lack the authority to grant licenses for the sale or consumption of marijuana.

When State Progress Meets Federal Pause

This shift underscores the evolving regulatory landscape for cannabis in Nevada, which has progressively distanced itself from the Board of Pharmacy’s traditional oversight.

The legal debate extends beyond the state level, highlighting the ongoing conflict between state and federal legislation. Even if Nevada were to reclassify cannabis, the federal classification would remain unchanged.

This moment in Nevada’s legal history is another example of the tension between progressive state policies on cannabis and the static nature of federal drug classification, underscoring a critical moment of potential change in the state’s approach to cannabis legislation.

Photo AI generated