Cannabis Users Cannot Be Barred From Gun Ownership, U.S. Appeals Court Rules

Zinger Key Points
  • A Texas woman's past cannabis use sparks a major legal ruling on gun ownership rights.
  • U.S. Circuit Judge Engelhardt ruled the lack of historical basis for disarming sober citizens over drug use.
  • The decision challenges federal bans, underscoring tensions between state cannabis laws and national gun regulations.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that a cannabis user in Texas cannot be legally prohibited from owning firearms, clarifying that past drug use does not strip individuals of their Second Amendment rights.

The court’s decision stemmed from the case of Texas resident Paola Connelly, who faced legal charges in December 2021 after police found several firearms in her home, according to Reuters. The ruling asserts that disarming Connelly based on her past marijuana use violates her Second Amendment rights, a stance backed by a 2022 Supreme Court decision that broadened gun ownership protections.

“Marijuana user or not, Paola is a member of our political community and thus has a presumptive right to bear arms,” wrote U.S. Circuit Judge Kurt Engelhardt, underscoring that the disqualification of sober individuals from gun ownership lacks historical basis.

  • Get Benzinga’s exclusive analysis and the top news about the cannabis industry and markets daily in your inbox for free. Subscribe to our newsletter here. If you’re serious about the business, you can’t afford to miss out.

However, the decision notably revived a separate charge against Connelly, related to transferring firearms to an individual using illegal drugs.

Supreme Court's Historic Leniency In Gun Ownership Rules

This appellate ruling aligns with the Supreme Court's stance in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which found that modern firearm laws must align with the nation’s longstanding traditions of firearm regulation. According to Engelhardt, regulations on drug users owning guns have not historically been stringent, with parallels drawn to minimal early regulations on alcohol and gun ownership.

The U.S. Department of Justice has yet to comment on the ruling, which could have implications for federal approaches to gun ownership eligibility, especially among the millions of Americans who use cannabis legally under state laws but find themselves in a legal grey area federally.

Read Next:

Photo: Courtesy of mwewering and PeterPike by Pixabay.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In: CannabisNewsRegulationsLegal5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appealscannabis gunsKurt EngelhardtPaola ConnellySecond Amendment
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!

Cannabis is evolving – don’t get left behind!

Curious about what’s next for the industry and how to leverage California’s unique market?

Join top executives, policymakers, and investors at the Benzinga Cannabis Market Spotlight in Anaheim, CA, at the House of Blues on November 12. Dive deep into the latest strategies, investment trends, and brand insights that are shaping the future of cannabis!

Get your tickets now to secure your spot and avoid last-minute price hikes.