FTX's Bankman-Fried Blames Former CTO For Erroneous Liquidations

Zinger Key Points
  • Erroneous liquidation of large accounts, such as Alameda, could have catastrophic consequences for FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried says.
  • FTX's "buy and burn" strategy involved using one-third of weekly profits to purchase and burn FTT.

Clarifying his stance on a series of allegations linked to erroneous liquidations, FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried vehemently defended his decisions, saying he had asked former FTX Chief Technology Officer and co-founder Gary Wang to stop liquidations on Alameda Research's accounts.

"I told Gary, we have to stop such liquidations of Alameda's account. They told me they'd done it. Now I know it was the 'Allow Negative,'" he said while testifying on the second day of his trial.

This revelation comes at a pivotal moment in the digital assets industry, with the Benzinga's Future of Digital Assets conference on Nov. 14 approaching. The event will shed light on the future trajectory of the sector and may be informed by such testimonies.

While discussing the beginnings of FTX, Bankman-Fried highlighted the organic growth of the platform, stating, "We asked our friends, we made improvements, word of mouth. It spread organically through social media, we interacted there."

He also mentioned the beneficial regulatory environment in Hong Kong as a primary reason for setting up operations there.

Also Read: Sam Bankman-Fried Denies Defrauding Investors: 'We Thought We Could Build The Best Product On The Market'

In the testimony, he shed light on the relationship between FTX and Alameda Research.

He expressed concerns about the potentially catastrophic consequences for FTX due to the erroneous liquidation of large accounts such as Alameda Research.

He also touched upon FTX's token, FTT, explaining the "buy and burn" strategy in which FTX used one-third of its weekly profits to purchase FTT and subsequently burn it.

The token was not only traded on FTX but also on other major exchanges, including Binance.

When questioned about market manipulation, Bankman-Fried cited a definition from Jane Street: "Bad trades to change the price of an asset."

This sparked an objection and a clarification from Judge Lewis Kaplan, who instructed the jury to rely on the court's definition of manipulation.

Bankman-Fried also highlighted the demanding nature of his role, sharing, "On a light day, 12 hours. On a hard day, 22 hours."

Read Next: Bitcoin, Ethereum: Are The Glory Days Over? Crypto Analyst Warns Of Diminishing Returns

Industry titans BlackRockDTCCOCCState StreetSociété GénéraleHederaCitiBMONorthern TrustCitibankAmazonS&P GlobalGoogleInvesco and Moody’s will join Benzinzga on Nov. 13 for Fintech Deal Day and Nov. 14 forFuture of Digital Assets. Secure a spot here to join them!

Photo: Created by MidJourney

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In: CryptocurrencyNewsLegalMarketsAlameda ResearchDigital AssetsFTXHong KongJane StreetSam Bankman-FriedSBF
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!