After President Donald Trump‘s sons unveiled Trump Mobile on Monday, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives described manufacturing phones in the U.S. as “a non-starter,” deeming it unprofitable.
What Happened: Dan Ives, in an X post, highlighted his conversation with ABC News, where he confirmed that trying to manufacture a phone in the U.S. wasn’t a profitable venture.
“Could the Trump organization produce phones, a few thousand, and probably lose money? Yeah! But the reality to produce phones in the U.S. is a fairytale,” he said.
Eric Trump and Donald Jr. Trump introduced Trump Mobile at a Monday event held at Trump Tower in New York, representing the latest entrepreneurial endeavor by the president's family.
The service will function as a mobile virtual network operator, leveraging the network infrastructure of T-Mobile US Inc. TMUS via Liberty Mobile.
Why It Matters: Ives has previously pointed out the similar extra costs that Tim Cook-run Apple Inc. AAPL could face to manufacture iPhones in the U.S.
In an April 3 post, he said, “If you like a $3,500 iPhone, we should build them in the US or a $1,000 iPhone built in China.”
He said that the logistics of moving iPhone manufacturing to the U.S. would be a “non-starter” at the current price point. “For U.S. consumers, the reality of a $1,000 iPhone being one of the best-made consumer products on the planet would disappear.”
Following his presidency, Trump and his family have expanded their business ventures beyond real estate into various sectors. Their latest launch is a mobile network, adding to a portfolio that already includes a social media platform, NFTs, bibles, sneakers, and a meme cryptocurrency.
Earlier in May, President Trump threatened to impose a 25% tariff on iPhones and confirmed that the same would apply to Samsung and other smartphone makers operating outside the U.S.
Price Action: The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF QQQ, which track the S&P 500 index and Nasdaq 100 index, respectively, fell in premarket on Tuesday. The SPY was down 0.44% at $600.00, while the QQQ declined 0.47% to $531.76, according to Benzinga Pro data.
Read Next:
Image via Shutterstock
Edge Rankings
Price Trend
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.