Mike Johnson-Proposed Government Shutdown Avoidance in Jeopardy As Rand Paul Weighs Options: 'I Haven't Decided'

On Monday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) signaled potential delays in the stopgap spending bill proposed by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), leaving uncertainty over the bill’s swift passage. Paul, known for his critical stance on spending without cuts, suggested a different approach for House Republicans.

What Happened: Paul has not committed to supporting the continuing resolution (CR) proposed to prevent a government shutdown, The Hill reports. Paul’s history of opposing spending increases without corresponding cuts raises the possibility of a delayed vote, reminiscent of his actions in 2018 which led to a brief government shutdown.

“I haven't decided,” Paul remarked regarding his support for the CR. “I'm not really for any CR that doesn't reduce spending,” he added, emphasizing the need for fiscal responsibility.

Paul advised that a conservative CR should be considered, which would necessitate bipartisan compromise. His stance presents a challenge for Speaker Johnson, who needs to garner sufficient support amidst divided opinions within the Republican caucus.

If Speaker Johnson’s bill secures the required Senate votes, Paul alone cannot block it but can influence the timing of its passage. Negotiations on debate duration provide Paul with an opportunity to assert his position.

In 2018, Paul’s insistence on an amendment vote led to a standoff with then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), resulting in a government shutdown.

Current Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) expressed approval of Johnson’s handling of the bill, which aims to fund the government through a clean CR into early next year. McConnell also supported the bill, calling it a “responsible measure.”

See Also: Unexpected Suspension Of Senator Tim Scott’s Presidential Campaign Stuns Campaign Staff

Why It Matters: The proposed CR is crucial to avoid a government shutdown, with significant implications for federal operations and services. The debate over spending cuts versus uninterrupted government funding is a recurring theme in congressional negotiations, as highlighted by previous Benzinga coverage.

Paul’s potential to delay the bill underscores the intricate balance of power in the Senate and the complexities of bipartisan agreement. It also reflects ongoing tensions within the Republican Party regarding fiscal policy.

Photo courtesy: Gage Skidmore On Flickr

Read Next: Trump’s Belief In Fringe Conspiracy Theory About Presidential Reinstatement Was Stoked By MyPillow Guy