Free Speech Or Censorship? Court Ponders Over Trump's Election Case Gag Order

The ongoing legal battle involving former President Donald Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election has taken a new turn. The federal appeals court is now deliberating whether to uphold certain aspects of a gag order imposed on Trump as part of this case.

What Happened: During a hearing on Monday, the appeals court hinted at its inclination to maintain parts of the gag order, while also contemplating potential modifications to its terms, as reported by The New York Times.

Originally issued by trial judge Tanya Chutkan in October, the gag order restricts Trump from publicly criticizing any prosecutors, potential witnesses, or court staff involved in the case. It does, however, allow for Trump to express his disapproval of the Justice Department, President Joe Biden, and Judge Chutkan, and to claim that the prosecution is a biased retaliation against him.

The order was appealed by Trump’s lawyers, arguing it to be a form of “censorship” infringing on his First Amendment rights, particularly during a campaign. In response, the appeals court has temporarily suspended the gag order while it reviews the challenge.

See Also: Former RNC Chair Calls For Trump’s Imprisonment For Attacks On Judges: ‘Put His A** In Jail. That’s How You End It’

During the hearing, the court’s panel of three judges questioned whether Trump’s social media posts should be deemed “core political speech” and be fully protected under the First Amendment, or if they could be seen as “political speech aimed at derailing or corrupting the criminal justice process.”

The panel also considered the potential for a gag order to act as a preventive measure to shield those involved in the case from possible threats or harassment. They pointed out a recurring pattern since the 2020 election where individuals mentioned in Trump’s posts were subsequently subjected to intimidation.

A final decision on the gag order by the appeals court’s three-judge panel is yet to be made, leaving open the possibility of further appeals to the Supreme Court.

Why It Matters: This deliberation follows a similar incident earlier this month, when a New York judge temporarily lifted a gag order on Trump amidst his ongoing civil fraud trial.

As per a Benzinga report, Trump had violated that order by criticizing court staff, incurring $15,000 in fines. The decision to suspend the order was taken while the appeal was under consideration. The ongoing deliberations by the federal appeals court reflect the continuing legal entanglements involving the former president and the contentious balance between free speech and legal proceedings.

Read Next: Trump Loyalist Laura Loomer Slams Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Memoir, Calls It ‘Trash’: ‘What A Shameless Grifter’