In a recent development, an Arizona federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit intending to disqualify former President Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s ballot in the upcoming year.
Castro’s lawsuit, filed in September, suggested that Trump’s involvement in the events of Jan. 6, 2021, violated Section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, thereby barring him from holding office. Judge Rayes refuted this claim, asserting that Castro did not have the standing to challenge Trump’s candidacy, and would not suffer a “competitive injury” if Trump were to be included on Arizona’s ballot in 2024.
The judge further stated that for an injury claim to hold, the plaintiff must genuinely compete with the allegedly ineligible candidate. Castro’s lack of campaign presence and contributions did not support this condition, making his claim untenable.
Responding to the decision, Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign, labeled Castro’s 14th Amendment challenge as a “bad faith” publicity stunt by a “thirsty, Biden-allied troll.”
Efforts of a similar nature have been pursued in other states, including Colorado, Minnesota, and Michigan, most of which have been dismissed by judges, with a few still under appeal.
Image via Shutterstock
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
