Trump's Mar-A-Lago Case Judge Clashes With Federal Prosecutor Over Request To Restrict Ex-President's Comments

A federal prosecutor and a judge have found themselves at odds over a request to limit former President Donald Trump‘s potentially harmful remarks about law enforcement agents involved in his classified documents case.

What Happened: The special counsel’s team, led by Jack Smith, is pushing for restrictions on Trump’s comments that could potentially put FBI agents involved in the case at risk, the Associated Press reported on Tuesday. This follows Trump’s false claim last month that the FBI was prepared to kill him during a search of his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, for classified documents two years ago.

Prosecutor David Harbach, part of Smith’s team, met immediate opposition from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee. Cannon questioned how an order could be crafted that did not infringe on Trump’s free speech rights and how prosecutors could establish a direct connection between Trump’s remarks and any subsequent harm to the public.

See Also: Vermont Lawmakers Overturn Gov.’s Veto And Approve Measure To Set Up Safe Drug-Consumption Sites In Most

Trump’s defense lawyer, Todd Blanche, contended that Trump’s comments did not pose an immediate threat to law enforcement and that the prosecutors’ request would have a chilling effect. Trump, who is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, was not required to be present for the hearing and was not in attendance.

Trump is facing multiple felony charges accusing him of illegally hoarding top-secret records at Mar-a-Lago and obstructing the FBI's efforts to retrieve them. The trial date has been indefinitely postponed, and no new date has been set.

Why It Matters: This is not the first time Trump has been involved in legal disputes regarding his public statements. In a previous hush money criminal trial, Trump was found in violation of a gag order and fined.

In the Mar-A-Lago case, Trump is facing charges under the Espionage Act for the willful retention of national defense information and obstruction of justice for attempting to conceal the records from authorities after they demanded their return. Despite the allegations, he continues to assert his innocence, describing the cases as a “witch hunt.”

According to Real Clear Politics, at the national level, Trump held 46.2% support among voters, While Biden trailed with 45.2% support.

Read Next: Trump Vs. Biden Race Is A Cliffhanger, But Pendulum Could Swing In Favor Of One Candidate As Voters In These 3 Battleground States Look To Flip

Image via Shutterstock

This story was generated using Benzinga Neuro and edited by Pooja Rajkumari

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In:
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!