Billionaire BlackRock CEO Larry Fink Declares No One Should Have To Work Longer Than They Want But Says Retiring At 65 Is 'Crazy'

In a world where retirement feels increasingly like a mirage on the horizon, Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, calls for a hard reset on how we think about retirement. 

His message? It's time to rethink the traditional retirement age of 65 – a concept he labels "crazy" given its ancient origins and the challenges facing Social Security and retirement savings in America.

The 65-Year Retirement Age: An Outdated Relic

"No one should have to work longer than they want to," Fink wrote in a recent letter. "But I do think it's a bit crazy that our anchor idea for the right retirement age – 65 years old – originates from the time of the Ottoman Empire."

Don't Miss:

• The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement — How do you compare?
• I’m 62 Years Old And Have $1.2 Million Saved. Is This Enough to Retire Stress-Free? 

This blunt critique points to a simple truth: the retirement age, established in the early 20th century, no longer fits modern realities. Back then, life expectancy was much shorter – many workers didn't even live long enough to see their retirement benefits. 

Fast forward to today and the script has flipped. Americans are living longer, which Fink calls "a wonderful thing," but this longevity is straining a retirement system that wasn't designed for decades-long retirements.

The Retirement Crisis and Social Security's Uncertain Future

A key piece of the puzzle is the looming Social Security funding shortfall. According to Fink, the program's Old Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund is expected to run out of money within the next decade. Once that happens, Social Security will rely solely on payroll taxes, which only cover about 79% of promised benefits, according to the National Association of Plan Advisors. 

Baby boomers contributed to Social Security for decades, helping build up a surplus. But now, as millions of them retire, those reserves are dwindling. Meanwhile, millennials and Gen Z are left staring at an increasingly shaky safety net.

Trending: Can you guess how many Americans successfully retire with $1,000,000 saved? The percentage may shock you.

Fink pulls no punches in his assessment of the baby boomer generation's role in this crisis: "They believe my generation – the baby boomers – have focused on their own financial well-being to the detriment of who comes next. And in the case of retirement, they're right."

Working Longer as a Solution

Fink isn't alone in suggesting that working longer could solve the retirement crisis. Republican lawmakers and even former presidential candidate Nikki Haley have floated similar ideas. Fink argues that working beyond 65 could help individuals save more, grow their Social Security benefits and ease the strain on the system.

"As a nation, we should do everything we can to make retirement investing more automatic for workers," he wrote, adding that employers need to step up to make retirement plans, like 401(k)s, more attractive and accessible to younger employees.

However, Fink acknowledges that working longer isn't an option for everyone. Health issues, job loss and age discrimination often force Americans to retire earlier than planned. A 2022 AARP survey found that most workers over 50 face ageism in the workplace and the median retirement age in the U.S. is just 62.

See Also: The average 401(k) balance soars to a record-breaking high – Here's how to know if your nest egg is keeping pace.

A Call for Generational Accountability

Fink believes his generation is responsible for addressing these systemic issues before passing the torch. "Before my generation fully disappears from positions of corporate and political leadership, we have an obligation to change that," he wrote.

He warns that if the retirement crisis isn't addressed, it will erode not just financial security but the collective faith Americans have in the country's future. "We risk becoming a country where people keep their money under the mattress and their dreams bottled up in their bedroom," he noted.

Whether you agree with him or not, his point about the traditional retirement age of 65 being rooted in an outdated era is worth considering. With Social Security's future uncertain and many Americans finding it tough to save enough, it's clear that our approach to retirement could use fresh thinking.

If you're worried about how to make retirement work for you – whether that's retiring early, working a bit longer or figuring out how to make your savings last – it might be a good idea to talk to a financial advisor. They can help you determine what's realistic for your situation and create a plan that gives you peace of mind.

Read Next:

• Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they’re on pace — here’s a breakdown on what’s behind this formula.
• ‘Which Bucket Do I Draw From First?’ Suze Orman Explains To 67-Year-Old The Best Order For Tapping Into Her Retirement Accounts