Kevin O'Leary Questions Charity Transparency — His Biggest Concern With Giving Is Not Knowing If The Money Actually Went Where It Was Promised

Most people who've found success want to give back. It just feels right—like sharing your good fortune is part of what makes it worthwhile. But there's a nagging issue that stops a lot of people in their tracks: transparency. When you donate, how do you really know your money's being used the way they promised?

Kevin O'Leary raised this exact question on X last week, and honestly, it’s a common concern. In an interview clip shared on the platform, he put it pretty bluntly, saying, "Charity isn't about tossing money into a black hole and hoping for the best." What really bothered him was the uncertainty: "How do I know my money actually went to what I was told it would do? That really troubled me. Because I had no idea what they did with it."

Don't Miss:

• These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends
• Are you rich? Here’s what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.

According to the National Philanthropic Trust, the average donor in the U.S. is 64 years old and makes two charitable donations annually. 

Research also indicates that charitable giving tends to increase with age. A study highlighted by Nonprofit Tech for Good found that 88% of individuals born between 1925 and 1945 donate to charity, contributing an average of $1,367 across 6.2 organizations a year.  

Charitable giving shouldn't be guesswork. Before changing his approach, O'Leary and his wife, Linda, were bombarded by requests from different charities—each with a compelling story. They'd donate once and then never again, like a scattered "machine gun" approach that didn't really accomplish much.

Trending: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab 4,000 of its pre-IPO shares for just $0.26/share!

Then they decided to get strategic, creating a method they call the "5 for 5" system. They chose five charities and committed to supporting them consistently for five years. But—and this is key—they treated these charities almost like investments. O'Leary asked for quarterly reports showing performance and expense ratios, just like you'd expect from a money manager. His reasoning? "I don't want to fund overhead—I want to fund the mission." If a charity's overhead costs became too high or if transparency slipped, they'd simply stop giving.

This might sound a bit tough, but it's actually just smart philanthropy. It's not about being stingy; it's about making sure the money actually goes to the people or causes you want to help. It's accountability.

See Also: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it?

O'Leary's perspective hits home because it reflects what a lot of people feel but don't always say openly. Wanting clarity and accountability in charitable giving is completely valid—and frankly, more charities might benefit from operating this way. Imagine if every donor expected results as clearly as they expect investment returns.

So, next time you're thinking of donating, remember O'Leary's approach. Giving generously doesn't mean giving blindly. It means making sure your generosity actually makes a difference.

Read Next:

• How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you? Tax deferring is their number one strategy.
• Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets – with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.26/share!