Latest news for AusQuest (OTC:AUQSF) Stock

AusQuest Ltd is engaged in the exploration and evaluation of mineral resources. The company's geographical segment includes Australia and South America. It derives a majority of its revenue from the Australian segment. The company projects include Peru, South America; Hamilton, Queensland; Balladonia, Western Yilgarn Ni Cu, and many more.

AusQuest Ltd

Stifel analyst Brad Reback maintains Intuit (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTU#NASDAQ">INTU</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $795 to $725.

News

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

INTU

Stifel Maintains Buy on Intuit, Lowers Price Target to $725

Across the recent three months, 13 analysts have shared their insights on Tenet Healthcare (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/THC#NYSE">THC</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated Tenet Healthcare and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $189.54, accompanied by a high estimate of $217.00 and a low estimate of $168.00. Marking an increase of 6.58%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $177.83. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287634_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
A clear picture of Tenet Healthcare's perception among financial experts is painted with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>John Ransom</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Mok</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$171.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Baxter</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$205.00</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sarah James</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$177.00</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jamie Perse</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$196.00</td>
<td>$173.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Hendrix</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$183.00</td>
<td>$174.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Macdonald</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>A.J. Rice</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$217.00</td>
<td>$197.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Baxter</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Macdonald</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Gillmor</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sarah James</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sarah James</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Tenet Healthcare. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Tenet Healthcare compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Tenet Healthcare's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Tenet Healthcare's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/THC/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Tenet Healthcare analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Tenet Healthcare's Background</h2>
Tenet Healthcare is a Dallas-based healthcare services organization. It operates a collection of hospitals (about 50 as of July 2024) and over 500 ambulatory surgery centers and other outpatient facilities across the U.S., primarily in the South. Through its Conifer segment, Tenet also provides revenue cycle management solutions.
<h3>Key Indicators: Tenet Healthcare's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization: Positioned above industry average, the company's market capitalization underscores its superiority in size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Revenue Growth: Tenet Healthcare's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 1.11%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Health Care sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Tenet Healthcare's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 9.22%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): Tenet Healthcare's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 12.92%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Tenet Healthcare's ROA surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 1.61% ROA, the company effectively utilizes its assets for optimal returns.
Debt Management: Tenet Healthcare's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 3.36.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Demystifying Tenet Healthcare: Insights From 13 Analyst Reviews

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) and its primary competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>26.57</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>9.45</td>
<td>9.77%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>18.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>22.23</td>
<td>6.53</td>
<td>6.17</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>10.76</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.19%</td>
<td>$7.46</td>
<td>$17.53</td>
<td>-0.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>91.59</td>
<td>6.84</td>
<td>5.86</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>29.81</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>6.25</td>
<td>2.92%</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>28.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>345.67</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>3.17</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>42.70</td>
<td>1.40</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>21.70</td>
<td>3.17</td>
<td>1.85</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.14</td>
<td>0.61</td>
<td>1.33</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>0.40</td>
<td>1.06</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>51.73</td>
<td>1.99</td>
<td>1.10</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>6.64</td>
<td>0.75</td>
<td>0.82</td>
<td>3.57%</td>
<td>$0.54</td>
<td>$1.1</td>
<td>-14.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>58.0</td>
<td>2.49</td>
<td>2.82</td>
<td>2.84%</td>
<td>$4.05</td>
<td>$6.79</td>
<td>5.46%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By thoroughly analyzing Meta Platforms, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 26.57, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.46x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 8.64 which exceeds the industry average by 3.47x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.45, which is 3.35x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.77%, which is 6.93% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion, which is 5.45x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 4.89x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 18.87%, which surpasses the industry average of 5.46%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287634_0_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating Meta Platforms against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
<ul>
<li>
Meta Platforms demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.
</li>
<li>
With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest the market values the company's assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

Trading Ideas

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Meta Platforms And Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

Macro Economic Events

Econ #s

Economics

Michigan 5-Year Inflation Expectations For November 3.2% Vs 3.1% Est.; 3.1% Prior

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>37.59</td>
<td>60.65</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>23.83%</td>
<td>$32.5</td>
<td>$43.88</td>
<td>6.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>15.42</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>0.99</td>
<td>2.34%</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>24.79</td>
<td>27.92</td>
<td>4.21</td>
<td>23.9%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$1.1</td>
<td>7.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>72.40</td>
<td>1.96</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>4.28%</td>
<td>$0.86</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>48.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>14.78</td>
<td>3.18</td>
<td>1.20</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>119.37</td>
<td>11.63</td>
<td>5.99</td>
<td>2.52%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.54</td>
<td>10.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>7.39</td>
<td>0.42</td>
<td>0.45</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>48.77</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Immersion Corp</td>
<td>4.82</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>13.41%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>1323.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>17.86</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>0.76</td>
<td>-0.34%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>14.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>36.18</td>
<td>5.76</td>
<td>1.97</td>
<td>6.38%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>167.76%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By closely studying Apple, we can observe the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 37.59, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio significantly exceeds the industry average by 1.04x, suggesting a premium valuation relative to industry peers.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 60.65 which exceeds the industry average by 10.53x.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.0, surpassing the industry average by 4.57x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.83% is 17.45% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.5 Billion, which is 95.59x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $43.88 Billion, which indicates 61.8x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 6.07% is significantly below the industry average of 167.76%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287626_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Apple in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
Compared to its top 4 peers, Apple has a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 1.87, indicating a balanced financial structure.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company maintains a reasonable level of debt while also leveraging equity financing.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to peers, indicating a potentially overvalued stock. On the other hand, Apple's high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit suggest strong profitability and operational efficiency. However, the low revenue growth rate may be a concern when compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Insights Into Apple's Performance Versus Peers In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Sector

Central Garden &amp; Pet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CENT#NASDAQ">CENT</a>) is gearing up to announce its quarterly earnings on Monday, 2024-11-25. Here's a quick overview of what investors should know before the release.
Analysts are estimating that Central Garden &amp; Pet will report an earnings per share (EPS) of $-0.20.
The announcement from Central Garden &amp; Pet is eagerly anticipated, with investors seeking news of surpassing estimates and favorable guidance for the next quarter.
It's worth noting for new investors that guidance can be a key determinant of stock price movements.
<h3>Past Earnings Performance</h3>
The company's EPS beat by $0.11 in the last quarter, leading to a 5.84% increase in the share price on the following day.
Here's a look at Central Garden &amp; Pet's past performance and the resulting price change:

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Quarter</th>
<th>Q3 2024</th>
<th>Q2 2024</th>
<th>Q1 2024</th>
<th>Q4 2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>EPS Estimate</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>-0.14</td>
<td>0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPS Actual</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>0.99</td>
<td>0.01</td>
<td>0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price Change %</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
<td>11.0%</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
<td>-10.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287624_0.png" alt="eps graph" />
<h3>Performance of Central Garden &amp; Pet Shares</h3>
Shares of Central Garden &amp; Pet were trading at $38.36 as of November 21. Over the last 52-week period, shares are up 21.81%. Given that these returns are generally positive, long-term shareholders are likely bullish going into this earnings release. 
<h3>Analyst Views on Central Garden &amp; Pet</h3>
Understanding market sentiments and expectations within the industry is crucial for investors. This analysis delves into the latest insights on Central Garden &amp; Pet.
A total of 2 analyst ratings have been received for Central Garden &amp; Pet, with the consensus rating being Buy. The average one-year price target stands at $44.0, suggesting a potential 14.7% upside.
<h3>Comparing Ratings with Competitors</h3>
This comparison focuses on the analyst ratings and average 1-year price targets of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Energizer Hldgs and WD-40, three major players in the industry, shedding light on their relative performance expectations and market positioning.
<ul>
<li>As per analysts' assessments, Spectrum Brands Holdings is favoring an Neutral trajectory, with an average 1-year price target of $94.0, suggesting a potential 145.05% upside.</li>
<li>For Energizer Hldgs, analysts project an Neutral trajectory, with an average 1-year price target of $37.25, indicating a potential 2.89% downside.</li>
<li>WD-40 is maintaining an Buy status according to analysts, with an average 1-year price target of $308.0, indicating a potential 702.92% upside.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Peers Comparative Analysis Summary</h3>
The peer analysis summary outlines pivotal metrics for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Energizer Hldgs and WD-40, demonstrating their respective standings within the industry and offering valuable insights into their market positions and comparative performance.

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Consensus</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
<th>Gross Profit</th>
<th>Return on Equity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Central Garden &amp; Pet</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>-2.63%</td>
<td>$317.06M</td>
<td>5.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spectrum Brands Holdings</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>4.46%</td>
<td>$288.10M</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Energizer Hldgs</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>-0.67%</td>
<td>$306.80M</td>
<td>36.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WD-40</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>11.06%</td>
<td>$84.34M</td>
<td>7.39%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Key Takeaway:
Central Garden &amp; Pet ranks at the top for Revenue Growth with a negative growth rate, indicating potential challenges. In terms of Gross Profit, it is at the top, showcasing strong profitability. However, its Return on Equity is at the bottom, suggesting lower returns for shareholders compared to peers. Overall, Central Garden &amp; Pet's performance is mixed compared to its peers in the analysis.
<h3>Delving into Central Garden &amp; Pet's Background</h3>
Central Garden &amp; Pet Co understands that home is central to life and has nurtured happy and healthy homes for over forty years. The segments of the company are the pet segment and garden segment. The company's trusted products are dedicated to helping lawns grow greener, gardens bloom bigger, pets live healthier and communities grow stronger. Central is home to a portfolio of more than sixty-five brands including Pennington, Nylabone, Kaytee, Amdro, and Aqueon, manufacturing and distribution capabilities, and a passionate, entrepreneurial growth culture. Central Garden and Pet is based in Walnut Creek, California, and has offices across North America and Europe.
<h3>Central Garden &amp; Pet: A Financial Overview</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Revenue Challenges: Central Garden &amp; Pet's revenue growth over 3 months faced difficulties. As of 30 June, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -2.63%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Staples sector.
Net Margin: Central Garden &amp; Pet's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 8.0%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Central Garden &amp; Pet's ROE lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns on equity capital. With an ROE of 5.14%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Central Garden &amp; Pet's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 2.23%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Central Garden &amp; Pet's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.87.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CENT/earnings">To track all earnings releases for Central Garden &amp; Pet visit their earnings calendar on our site.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Earnings

CENT

Insights into Central Garden & Pet's Upcoming Earnings

Throughout the last three months, 24 analysts have evaluated Roblox (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RBLX#NYSE">RBLX</a>), offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Roblox, revealing an average target of $56.83, a high estimate of $65.00, and a low estimate of $49.00. Marking an increase of 15.98%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $49.00. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287624_0_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
The standing of Roblox among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Marok</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Bazinet</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Benjamin Black</td>
<td>Deutsche Bank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Cost</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ken Gawrelski</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ross Sandler</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thomas Champion</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Sheridan</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Pitz</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Lee</td>
<td>Macquarie</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Hickey</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$44.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cory Carpenter</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Tilchen</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clark Lampen</td>
<td>BTIG</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bernie McTernan</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Marok</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick McKay</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick McKay</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cory Carpenter</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ken Gawrelski</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick McKay</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thomas Champion</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Bazinet</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clark Lampen</td>
<td>BTIG</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Roblox. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Roblox compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of Roblox's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Roblox's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/RBLX/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Roblox analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Discovering Roblox: A Closer Look</h2>
Roblox operates an online video game platform with 80 million daily active users that lets young gamers create, develop, and monetize games (or "experiences") for other players. The firm offers its developers a hybrid of a game engine, publishing platform, online hosting and services, marketplace with payment processing, and social network. The platform is a closed garden that Roblox controls, earning $3.5 billion in bookings in 2023 through in-game purchases and advertising while benefiting from outsourced game development. Unlike traditional video game publishers, Roblox is more focused on the creation of new tools and monetization techniques for its developers than creating new games or franchises.
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: Roblox's Finances</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Above industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization emphasizes a noteworthy size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Roblox's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 28.84% as of 30 September, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Communication Services sector.
Net Margin: Roblox's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of -26.04%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Roblox's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -153.7%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Roblox's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of -3.64%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: Roblox's debt-to-equity ratio stands notably higher than the industry average, reaching 9.26. This indicates a heavier reliance on borrowed funds, raising concerns about financial leverage.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

RBLX

Roblox Stock: A Deep Dive Into Analyst Perspectives (24 Ratings)

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Software industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>34.09</td>
<td>10.67</td>
<td>12.13</td>
<td>8.87%</td>
<td>$38.23</td>
<td>$45.49</td>
<td>16.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>49.60</td>
<td>49.30</td>
<td>10.12</td>
<td>30.01%</td>
<td>$5.44</td>
<td>$9.4</td>
<td>6.86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>163.09</td>
<td>23.25</td>
<td>20.78</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>22.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>51.58</td>
<td>22.07</td>
<td>17.04</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>$1.62</td>
<td>-2.32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>518.19</td>
<td>30.72</td>
<td>25.25</td>
<td>1.75%</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>$0.73</td>
<td>31.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>47.25</td>
<td>79.35</td>
<td>12.70</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>8.76</td>
<td>4.88</td>
<td>7.92%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>3.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>642.47</td>
<td>14.18</td>
<td>15.66</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>29.83</td>
<td>3.09</td>
<td>6.13</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>43.32</td>
<td>26.87</td>
<td>8.58</td>
<td>5.56%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>16.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>29.19</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>26.60</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>33.15</td>
<td>12.22</td>
<td>9.51</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>36.95</td>
<td>6.93</td>
<td>4.26</td>
<td>6.88%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>35.73</td>
<td>23.25</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>59.32</td>
<td>1.63</td>
<td>2.85</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>126.41</td>
<td>21.65</td>
<td>11.86</td>
<td>14.13%</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>10.19%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a thorough examination of Microsoft, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 34.09 significantly below the industry average by 0.27x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 10.67, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.49x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 12.13, surpassing the industry average by 1.02x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.87% that is 5.26% below the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.23 Billion, which is 65.91x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $45.49 Billion, which indicates 36.69x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 16.04%, outperforming the industry average of 10.19%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287617_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When examining Microsoft in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector, as indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive aspect for investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios are low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. However, the high PS ratio suggests overvaluation based on revenue. The low ROE may indicate lower profitability compared to peers, despite high EBITDA and gross profit margins. The high revenue growth suggests strong performance in generating sales.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Performance Comparison: Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry

In the latest quarter, 8 analysts provided ratings for Celestica (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CLS#NYSE">CLS</a>), showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $74.88, a high estimate of $95.00, and a low estimate of $58.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 20.13% from the previous average price target of $62.33.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287615_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
The perception of Celestica by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Vogt</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>George Wang</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$91.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Chan</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Sheerin</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paul Treiber</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thanos Moschopoulos</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Chan</td>
<td>TD Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$61.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Sheerin</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Celestica. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Celestica compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts gauge the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Celestica's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Celestica's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CLS/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Celestica analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Celestica</h2>
Celestica Inc offers supply chain solutions. The company has two operating and reportable segments: Advanced Technology Solutions (ATS) and Connectivity &amp; Cloud Solutions (CCS). The ATS segment consists of the ATS end market and is comprised of the Aerospace and Defense, Industrial, health tech, and Capital Equipment businesses. Its Capital Equipment business is comprised of the semiconductor, display, and robotics equipment businesses, and the CCS segment consists of Communications and Enterprise end markets, Enterprise end market is comprised of its servers and storage businesses. The company generates a majority of its revenue from the Connectivity &amp; Cloud Solutions segment.
<h3>Celestica: A Financial Overview</h3>
Market Capitalization: Exceeding industry standards, the company's market capitalization places it above industry average in size relative to peers. This emphasizes its significant scale and robust market position.
Revenue Growth: Celestica's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 22.33%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Celestica's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 3.67% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 5.06%, the company showcases effective utilization of equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Celestica's ROA surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 1.55% ROA, the company effectively utilizes its assets for optimal returns.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52, Celestica adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings For Celestica

Michigan 1-Year Inflation Expectations For November 2.6% Vs 2.6% Est.; 2.6% Prior

Macro Notification

General

Michigan Consumer Sentiment For November 71.8 Vs 73.0 Est.; 70.5 Prior

Michigan Current Conditions (Nov) 63.9 vs 64.4 Est.; Prior 64.4

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>57.90</td>
<td>54.51</td>
<td>32.19</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>30.68</td>
<td>8.08</td>
<td>12.16</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
<td>$555.05</td>
<td>$439.35</td>
<td>38.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>132.42</td>
<td>11.66</td>
<td>16.23</td>
<td>-2.77%</td>
<td>$6.39</td>
<td>$8.36</td>
<td>47.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>121.67</td>
<td>3.92</td>
<td>9.25</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>36.84</td>
<td>10.47</td>
<td>11.58</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-8.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>17.39</td>
<td>6.57</td>
<td>4.51</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>220.11</td>
<td>23.28</td>
<td>40.02</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>146.80</td>
<td>2.52</td>
<td>4.58</td>
<td>1.99%</td>
<td>$3.63</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>93.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>64.45</td>
<td>3.02</td>
<td>11.01</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$1.04</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>-24.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>46.19</td>
<td>5.69</td>
<td>6.58</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>16.99</td>
<td>3.40</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>64.54</td>
<td>11.87</td>
<td>13.73</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>10.10</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>1.62</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>-26.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>19.54</td>
<td>2.24</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>15.67</td>
<td>2.57</td>
<td>5.08</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.71</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>2.40</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>23.05</td>
<td>2.15</td>
<td>3.29</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>126.28</td>
<td>8.44</td>
<td>13.24</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>33.55</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>12.37</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>51.24</td>
<td>10.25</td>
<td>12.87</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>62.54</td>
<td>6.52</td>
<td>9.78</td>
<td>3.47%</td>
<td>$33.37</td>
<td>$27.12</td>
<td>7.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By carefully studying NVIDIA, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 57.9, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.93x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 54.51 relative to the industry average by 8.36x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 32.19, surpassing the industry average by 3.29x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% that is 27.66% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.69x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.96x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 93.61%, which surpasses the industry average of 7.5%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287609_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When examining NVIDIA in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:
<ul>
<li>
NVIDIA is in a relatively stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests that NVIDIA may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the market values the company's assets and sales more highly. On the other hand, the high ROE, revenue growth, and low EBITDA and gross profit ratios suggest that NVIDIA is generating strong returns on equity and experiencing significant revenue growth, despite lower earnings and gross profit margins.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Industry Comparison: Evaluating NVIDIA Against Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Over the past 24 hours, Cardano's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ada/usd">ADA</a>) price rose 13.56% to $0.90. This continues its positive trend over the past week where it has experienced a 34.0% gain, moving from $0.67 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $3.09. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Cardano over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287606_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has increased 15.0% over the past week. while the overall circulating supply of the coin has decreased 0.04% This puts its current circulating supply at an estimated 79.52% of its max supply, which is 45.00 billion. The current market cap ranking for ADA is #10 at $32.08 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1732287606_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$ADA

Test0.41646414233755824: Cardano's Price Increased More Than 13% Within 24 hours

Stifel analyst Simon Yarmak maintains Host Hotels &amp; Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HST#NASDAQ">HST</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $21 to $20.5.

Stifel Maintains Buy on Host Hotels & Resorts, Lowers Price Target to $20.5

DEVS

DevvStream Corp Shares Halted To The Upside; Stock Now Up 77.29%

Stifel analyst Brad Reback maintains Elastic (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ESTC#NYSE">ESTC</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $98 to $132.

ESTC

Stifel Maintains Buy on Elastic, Raises Price Target to $132

Benchmark analyst Bruce Jackson maintains Clene (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CLNN#NASDAQ">CLNN</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $90 to $84.

CLNN

Benchmark Maintains Buy on Clene, Lowers Price Target to $84

Top Wall Street analysts changed their outlook on these top names. For a complete view of all analyst rating changes, including upgrades and downgrades, please see our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings">analyst ratings page</a>.
<ul>
<li>Raymond James analyst John Ransom downgraded the rating for HCA Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HCA#NYSE">HCA</a>) from Outperform to Market Perform. HCA Healthcare shares closed at $332.24 on Thursday. See how other analysts view this stock.</li>
<li>JMP Securities analyst Matthew Carletti downgraded the rating for Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ROOT#NASDAQ">ROOT</a>) from Market Outperform to Market Perform. Root shares closed at $109.40 on Thursday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/root/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
<li>Needham analyst Mike Matson downgraded TransMedics Group, Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TMDX#NASDAQ">TMDX</a>) from Buy to Hold and maintained the price target of $109. TransMedics shares closed at $79.34 on Thursday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/tmdx/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
<li>Keybanc analyst Steve Barger downgraded the rating for The Timken Company (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TKR#NYSE">TKR</a>) from Overweight to Sector Weight. Timken shares closed at $75.22 on Thursday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/tkr/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
<li>B. Riley Securities analyst Alex Rygiel downgraded Atkore Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ATKR#NYSE">ATKR</a>) from Buy to Neutral and lowered the price target from $135 to $84. Atkore shares closed at $85.14 on Thursday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/atkr/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
</ul>
Considering buying HCA stock? Here&#8217;s what analysts think: 
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="558" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/22095511/image-247-1024x558.png" alt="" class="wp-image-661076" style="width:678px;height:auto" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/22095511/image-247-1024x558.png 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/22095511/image-247-300x163.png 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/22095511/image-247-768x418.png 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/22095511/image-247.png 1225w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
Read This Next:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/11/42135346/top-3-materials-stocks-that-could-blast-off-in-november"> </a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/11/42135346/top-3-materials-stocks-that-could-blast-off-in-november">Top 3 Materials Stocks That Could Blast Off In November</a></li>
</ul>

Downgrades

ATKR

ROOT

TMDX

This HCA Healthcare Analyst Is No Longer Bullish; Here Are Top 5 Downgrades For Friday

JP Morgan analyst Mark Murphy maintains Intuit (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTU#NASDAQ">INTU</a>) with a Neutral and raises the price target from $600 to $640.

Comments

AusQuest

News

Latest news for AusQuest (OTC:AUQSF) Stock

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga