Latest news for Samara Asset Group (OTC:CAGPF) Stock

Samara Asset Group PLC deploys its assets through Samara Alpha Management, which operates in fund-of-funds, hedge fund seeding and technology platforms. Its purpose is to invest in emerging managers and builders in Bitcoin, fostering their growth and providing strength and guidance for their journey.

SAMARA ASSET GROUP PLC by SAMARA ASSET GROUP PLC

Samara Asset Group PLC

<a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/commission-statement-snap.pdf">https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/commission-statement-snap.pdf</a>
&nbsp;
<a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-snap-statement.pdf" title="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-snap-statement.pdf">https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-snap-statement.pdf</a>

News

Legal

SNAP

The FTC Has Referred To The Department Of Justice A Complaint Against Snap, Inc. The Complaint Pertains To The Company's Deployment Of An Artificial Intelligence Powered Chatbot, My AI, In Its Snapchat Application And The Allegedly Resulting Risks And Harms To Young Users Of The Application.

UBS analyst Daniel Ford maintains Edison Intl (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EIX#NYSE">EIX</a>) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $87 to $69.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

UBS Maintains Neutral on Edison Intl, Lowers Price Target to $69

UBS analyst Kevin Caliendo maintains Evolent Health (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EVH#NYSE">EVH</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $27 to $14.

UBS Maintains Buy on Evolent Health, Lowers Price Target to $14

Seaport Global analyst Tom Curran maintains Fluence Energy (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FLNC#NASDAQ">FLNC</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $32 to $24.

FLNC

Seaport Global Maintains Buy on Fluence Energy, Lowers Price Target to $24

In the last three months, 4 analysts have published ratings on Utz Brands (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UTZ#NYSE">UTZ</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $20.5, a high estimate of $24.00, and a low estimate of $17.00. A 9.89% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $22.75. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737057658_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
The perception of Utz Brands by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Robert Moskow</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Baumgartner</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Utz Brands. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Utz Brands compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of Utz Brands's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Utz Brands's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/UTZ/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Utz Brands analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Delving into Utz Brands's Background</h2>
Utz Brands Inc is a snack food manufacturing company. It manufactures a diverse portfolio of salty snacks under popular brands including Utz, Zapp's, Golden Flake, Boulder Canyon, Hawaiian, TORTIYAHS!, among others. The company's products include potato chips, tortilla chips, pretzels, cheese snacks, pork skins, veggie snacks, pub/party mixes, and other snacks.. Its products are distributed nationally and internationally through grocery, mass merchant, club, convenience, drug, and other channels. It operates in the given segment: the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale of snack food products.
<h3>Financial Milestones: Utz Brands's Journey</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Positioned below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization faces constraints in size. This could be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Utz Brands faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -1.7% in revenue growth as of 30 September, 2024. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Consumer Staples sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of -0.6%, the company may need to address challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Utz Brands's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -0.32%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Utz Brands's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -0.08%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 1.26, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Forecasting The Future: 4 Analyst Projections For Utz Brands

In the preceding three months, 8 analysts have released ratings for Red Rock Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RRR#NASDAQ">RRR</a>), presenting a wide array of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Red Rock Resorts, revealing an average target of $55.25, a high estimate of $64.00, and a low estimate of $44.00. This current average has decreased by 11.24% from the previous average price target of $62.25. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737057648_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
The perception of Red Rock Resorts by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Hecht</td>
<td>JMP Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Outperform</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
<td>$61.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barry Jonas</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cassandra Lee</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Chaiken</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$44.00</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Chaiken</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chad Beynon</td>
<td>Macquarie</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandt Montour</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barry Jonas</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Red Rock Resorts. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Red Rock Resorts compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Red Rock Resorts's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/RRR/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Red Rock Resorts analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Red Rock Resorts</h2>
Red Rock Resorts Inc along with its subsidiary is a gaming, development, and management company. The company mainly develops strategically located casino and entertainment properties. It generates a majority of its revenue from Casino.
<h3>Red Rock Resorts's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Red Rock Resorts's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 13.7% as of 30 September, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Consumer Discretionary sector, the company excelled with a growth rate higher than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Red Rock Resorts's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 6.19%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): Red Rock Resorts's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of 17.31%, the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.
Return on Assets (ROA): Red Rock Resorts's ROA surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 0.72% ROA, the company effectively utilizes its assets for optimal returns.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 19.63, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Where Red Rock Resorts Stands With Analysts

Throughout the last three months, 8 analysts have evaluated Wolfspeed (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WOLF#NYSE">WOLF</a>), offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated Wolfspeed and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $15.75, accompanied by a high estimate of $20.00 and a low estimate of $6.00. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 19.72%. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737057637_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The standing of Wolfspeed among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Brian Lee</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vijay Rakesh</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$6.00</td>
<td>$10.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>George Gianarikas</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Samik Chatterjee</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Lee</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Craig Irwin</td>
<td>Roth MKM</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christopher Rolland</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$11.00</td>
<td>$16.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Harsh Kumar</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Wolfspeed. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Wolfspeed compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Wolfspeed's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of Wolfspeed's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/WOLF/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Wolfspeed analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Discovering Wolfspeed: A Closer Look</h2>
Wolfspeed Inc is involved in the manufacturing of wide bandgap semiconductors. It is focused on silicon carbide and gallium nitride materials and devices for power and radio-frequency (RF) applications. The company serves applications such as transportation, power supplies, inverters, and wireless systems. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from Europe and the rest from the United States, China, Hong Kong, Asia Pacific, and other regions.
<h3>Wolfspeed's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Revenue Challenges: Wolfspeed's revenue growth over 3 months faced difficulties. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -1.37%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Wolfspeed's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of -144.94%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Wolfspeed's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -37.35%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Wolfspeed's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of -3.56%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 9.83, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
Analysts are specialists within banking and financial systems that typically report for specific stocks or within defined sectors. These people research company financial statements, sit in conference calls and meetings, and speak with relevant insiders to determine what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts will rate each stock once a quarter. 
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

WOLF

A Glimpse Into The Expert Outlook On Wolfspeed Through 8 Analysts

During the last three months, 8 analysts shared their evaluations of Fortune Brands (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FBIN#NYSE">FBIN</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Providing deeper insights, analysts have established 12-month price targets, indicating an average target of $90.25, along with a high estimate of $97.00 and a low estimate of $78.00. This current average reflects an increase of 0.7% from the previous average price target of $89.62. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737057629_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Fortune Brands is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Bouley</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$91.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Susan Maklari</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$97.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Wojs</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$94.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Lovallo</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$97.00</td>
<td>$98.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Keith Hughes</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$92.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Kim</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>In-Line</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ketan Mamtora</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$84.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Wojs</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$94.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Fortune Brands. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Providing a comprehensive analysis, analysts offer qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Fortune Brands compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Fortune Brands's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Fortune Brands's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FBIN/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Fortune Brands analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Fortune Brands's Background</h2>
Fortune Brands Innovations is a leading home and security products company that has three reportable segments. The company's $2.6 billion water segment, led by the Moen brand, sells faucets, showers, and other plumbing fixtures; the $1.3 billion outdoors segment primarily sells entry doors under the Therma-Tru brand name and Fiberon-branded patio decking; and the $723 million security segment sells locks and other security devices under the Master Lock, SentrySafe, Yale, and August brand names.
<h3>Fortune Brands: A Financial Overview</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Revenue Growth: Fortune Brands's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -8.4%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Net Margin: Fortune Brands's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 11.82%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 5.78%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Fortune Brands's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 2.06%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: Fortune Brands's debt-to-equity ratio surpasses industry norms, standing at 1.21. This suggests the company carries a substantial amount of debt, posing potential financial challenges.
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

FBIN

Forecasting The Future: 8 Analyst Projections For Fortune Brands

Providing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish, 9 analysts have published ratings on Principal Finl Gr (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PFG#NASDAQ">PFG</a>) in the last three months.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $83.89, a high estimate of $92.00, and a low estimate of $69.00. This current average has decreased by 2.7% from the previous average price target of $86.22. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737057621_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Principal Finl Gr. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Scott Heleniak</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$91.00</td>
<td>$91.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$69.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Krueger</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$93.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jimmy Bhullar</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$92.00</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Barnidge</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$84.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bob Huang</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$86.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Heleniak</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$91.00</td>
<td>$87.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Scott</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$77.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Principal Finl Gr. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Principal Finl Gr compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Principal Finl Gr's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PFG/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Principal Finl Gr analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know Principal Finl Gr Better</h2>
Principal Financial Group Inc is a leader in Global investment management offering businesses, individuals and institutional clients a wide range of financial products and services, including retirement, asset management and insurance through diverse family of financial services companies. It operates in four business segments that are Retirement and Income Solutions, Principal Global Investors, Principal International, and United States Insurance Solutions. The company receives maximum revenue in the form of premiums.
<h3>Key Indicators: Principal Finl Gr's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization: Positioned above industry average, the company's market capitalization underscores its superiority in size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Principal Finl Gr faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -34.51% in revenue growth as of 30 September, 2024. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: Principal Finl Gr's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of -7.31%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of -1.98%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Principal Finl Gr's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -0.07%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: Principal Finl Gr's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.35, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Breaking Down Principal Finl Gr: 9 Analysts Share Their Views

19 analysts have expressed a variety of opinions on Shift4 Payments (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FOUR#NYSE">FOUR</a>) over the past quarter, offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.
In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Shift4 Payments, revealing an average target of $117.11, a high estimate of $150.00, and a low estimate of $100.00. Marking an increase of 11.53%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $105.00. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737057611_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Shift4 Payments is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Bauch</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rayna Kumar</td>
<td>Oppenheimer</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$121.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>James Faucette</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$109.00</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sanjay Sakhrani</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$112.00</td>
<td>$112.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Kupferberg</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
<td>$112.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Will Nance</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
<td>$119.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hal Goetsch</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Heckmann</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$126.00</td>
<td>$118.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Will Nance</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$119.00</td>
<td>$106.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tim Chiodo</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Bauch</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hal Goetsch</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$104.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>James Friedman</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Positive</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clarke Jeffries</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$93.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hal Goetsch</td>
<td>BTIG</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$118.00</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Kupferberg</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$112.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>James Friedman</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Positive</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
<td>$97.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Bauch</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Heckmann</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$118.00</td>
<td>$104.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Shift4 Payments. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Shift4 Payments compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Shift4 Payments's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of Shift4 Payments's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FOUR/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Shift4 Payments analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know Shift4 Payments Better</h2>
Shift4 Payments Inc is provider of integrated payment processing and technology solutions. The company offers software providers a single integration to an end-to-end payments offering, a powerful gateway and a robust suite of technology solutions (including cloud enablement, business intelligence, analytics, and mobile) to enhance the value of their software suites and simplify payment acceptance. The company derives maximum revenue from United States.
<h3>Shift4 Payments: Delving into Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Revenue Growth: Shift4 Payments displayed positive results in 3 months. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 34.62%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: Shift4 Payments's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 5.92%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Shift4 Payments's ROE lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns on equity capital. With an ROE of 7.11%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Shift4 Payments's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of 1.26%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: Shift4 Payments's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 3.54, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

FOUR

What 19 Analyst Ratings Have To Say About Shift4 Payments

Who knew stodgy utilities would turn into tech's <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/utilities">unsung heroes</a>? 
JPMorgan analysts Jeremy Tonet and Richard W. Sunderland chose Entergy Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ETR#NYSE">ETR</a>), NiSource Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NI#NYSE">NI</a>), and Vistra Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VST#NYSE">VST</a>) as top stock picks, betting on a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/artificial-intelligence">power-hungry AI revolution</a> and surging data center demand to fuel their growth.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Entergy: Oops, It Did It Again?</h2>
Entergy is making waves with yet another massive data center deal in Louisiana. A local filing hints at a $12 billion Hut 8 project, which, if confirmed, would be the utility's third major hyperscaler win. 
JPMorgan sees this as validation of Entergy's growing dominance in the large commercial &amp; industrial (C&amp;I) power space—big tech is setting up shop, and Entergy is cashing in. 
With Meta Platform's (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) $10 billion investment in Northern Louisiana and Amazon.com Inc's (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) $10 billion spend in Mississippi, the trend is clear: AI needs juice, and Entergy is becoming the go-to provider.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/42865524/amazon-aws-will-invest-at-least-11-billion-in-georgia-to-boost-ai-and-cloud-infrastructure-we-expect-to-create-more-than-550-well-paying-jobs">Amazon AWS To Invest $11 Billion In Georgia To Boost AI And Cloud Infrastructure: &#8216;Expect To Create More Than 550 Well-Paying Jobs&#8217;</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vistra: Hold Onto That Power Feeling</h2>
Vistra isn't just another independent power producer (IPP)—it's JPMorgan's top pick among IPPs (independent power producers), with a strong balance of natural gas leverage and nuclear opportunity. The firm sees manufacturing onshoring, electrification, and relentless data center demand driving power prices higher, and Vistra is positioned to capitalize. 
While competitors like Constellation Energy Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CEG#NASDAQ">CEG</a>) and Talen Energy Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TLN#NASDAQ">TLN</a>) also have nuclear exposure, JPMorgan believes Vistra offers the best risk/reward balance, thanks to its Permian and Appalachia gas assets and strategic flexibility.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">NiSource: A Sleeper Bet On Load Growth</h2>
NiSource may not have Entergy's headline-grabbing hyperscaler deals, but it's quietly benefiting from the same secular trends. 
JPMorgan sees broader electrification and industrial demand bolstering NiSource's long-term growth, making it a strong contender for utility investors looking beyond the AI gold rush.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Big Picture</h2>
JPMorgan believes 2024's power demand boom is just getting started, and utilities with data center exposure are in pole position. 
While Entergy leads the pack with another possible hyperscaler deal, Vistra's diversified portfolio and NiSource's steady growth make them standout picks ahead of earnings. 
For investors betting on AI's insatiable energy appetite, these utilities might just be the next big trade.
Read Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43032486/meta-boosts-green-energy-with-new-solar-deal-supporting-ai-data-center-growth">Meta Boosts Green Energy With New Solar Deal, Supports AI Data Center Growth</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Long Ideas

Tech

Trading Ideas

AMZN

Are Utilities The New Tech? Why Entergy, NiSource, Vistra Are JPMorgan's Top Picks For 2025

Scotiabank analyst Nicholas Yulico maintains W.P. Carey (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WPC#NYSE">WPC</a>) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from $60 to $59.

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on W.P. Carey, Lowers Price Target to $59

Scotiabank analyst Nicholas Yulico maintains Realty Income (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/O#NYSE">O</a>) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from $61 to $59.

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Realty Income, Lowers Price Target to $59

The board of directors of&nbsp;WEC Energy Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WEC#NYSE">WEC</a>) today declared a quarterly cash dividend of 89.25 cents per share on the company's common stock, an increase of 6.9 percent over the current quarterly dividend of 83.50 cents per share. This raises the annual dividend rate to $3.57 per share.
The higher dividend is payable March 1, 2025, to stockholders of record on Feb. 14, 2025. This marks the 330th&nbsp;consecutive quarter — dating back to 1942 — that the company will have paid a dividend to its stockholders.

Dividends

WEC Energy Group Raises Quarterly Dividend From $0.8350 To $0.8925

KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KLAC#NASDAQ">KLAC</a>) shares are ripping higher on Thursday. They are trading in sympathy with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSM#NYSE">TSM</a>), which reported earnings ahead of estimates.
But KLA Corporation may be about to reverse and head lower. This is why our team of technical analysts has made it our Stock of the Day.
Momentum is a measurement of how far a stock has moved up or down in a given period of time. Most of the time, a stock will stay in its typical or usual trading range.
If sellers are aggressive and push the price below this range, traders say it is oversold. If buyers push the price above the range, traders say it is overbought.
These are important dynamics. Many trading strategies are based on the concept of reversion to the mean. Stocks that are overbought or oversold tend to reverse back into their average trading ranges.
There are dozens and maybe even hundreds of different ways to measure a stock's momentum. These are called momentum indicators or oscillators.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="550" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/16144506/KLACorp-1024x550.png" alt="" class="wp-image-737613" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/16144506/KLACorp-1024x550.png 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/16144506/KLACorp-300x161.png 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/16144506/KLACorp-768x412.png 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/16144506/KLACorp.png 1527w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/25/01/43036902/tesla-stock-valuation-analyst-flags-long-term-growth-opportunities-robotaxis-fsd">Tesla Stock &#8216;Valuation Is Full&#8217;: Analyst Flags Long-Term Growth Opportunities With Robotaxis, FSD</a>
Some new traders make the mistake of using too many of these indicators. They believe that the more they study, the better their results will be.
But sometimes a trader would be better off just using a few and mastering them.
The lower part of the chart is the Relative Strength Momentum Indicator (RSI). This is a popular indicator. When the blue line is higher than the horizontal red line, it indicates overbought conditions.  As you can see, that is the case now.
The red line on the price chart is called a Bollinger Band. It is another popular way to measure momentum.
The line is two standard deviations above the 20-day moving average. Statistics and probability theory suggest that 95% of trading should occur within two standard deviations of the mean.
If the stock exceeds this threshold, it is considered to be overbought. As you can see, that is the case now.
The last two times <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/KLAC">KLA Corporation</a> was shown to be overbought simultaneously by both of these indicators, a sell-off followed soon after. It may be about to happen again.
Read Next: • <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/travel/25/01/43036258/polar-vortex-brings-winters-coldest-air-for-trumps-inauguration-day-what-it-means-for-utilities-retailers-energy-stocks">Polar Vortex Brings Winter&#8217;s Coldest Air For Trump&#8217;s Inauguration Day: What It Means For Utilities, Retailers, Energy Stocks</a>
Photo: JHVEPhoto via Shutterstock

Technicals

KLAC

Stock Of The Day: Is KLA Corporation's Rally About To End?

Scotiabank analyst Greg McGinniss maintains Gaming and Leisure Props (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GLPI#NASDAQ">GLPI</a>) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from $50 to $49.

GLPI

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Gaming and Leisure Props, Lowers Price Target to $49

On Thursday, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/spruce-point-capital">Spruce Point Capital released</a> a detailed report on PROCEPT BioRobotics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PRCT#NASDAQ">PRCT</a>), raising concerns about the claims surrounding its market potential and growth prospects, suggesting the company&#8217;s stock could face a 30% to 60% downside.
Spruce Point questions the credibility of Procept&#8217;s addressable market estimates, business metrics, and valuation.
Procept BioRobotics specializes in a robotic surgical system for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH or enlarged prostate).
Benzinga has contacted Procept for comment on the Spruce Point report and will update if a response is received.
The company&#8217;s Aquablation therapy, a waterjet procedure designed to minimize sexual side effects compared to other surgeries, has gained traction in high-volume U.S. hospitals, contributing to significant revenue growth—from under $10 million in 2020 to $200 million, according to Spruce Point.
However, Spruce Point argues that Procept's comparison to Intuitive Surgical Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ISRG#NASDAQ">ISRG</a>) is misleading and that the addressable market for Aquablation is significantly overstated.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/10/41583831/surgical-robotics-provider-procept-biorobotics-q3-earnings-beats-street-view-analys" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Surgical Robotics Provider PROCEPT BioRobotics&#8217; Q3 Earnings Beats Street View, Analyst Optimistic About Upside Potential</a>
Spruce Point <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250116281668/en/Spruce-Point-Capital-Management-Announces-Investment-Opinion-Releases-Report-and-Strong-Sell-Research-Opinion-on-PROCEPT-BioRobotics-NASDAQ-PRCT" rel="noreferrer noopener">writes</a> that Aquablation&#8217;s appeal is limited to a niche segment of patients with large prostates, representing only a small fraction of the BPH market. Most BPH patients suffer from mild to moderate symptoms, often managed with medications or minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs).
These outpatient procedures, offering minimal risks and shorter recovery times, have rapidly gained market share since 2014, accounting for 40-45% of BPH surgeries. Spruce Point says MISTs will continue to outpace resective procedures like Aquablation.
Further concerns stem from Procept's rising days sales outstanding (DSOs), which have increased from 47 to 130 days over three years, signaling potential sales and accounting issues.
Spruce Point also found inconsistencies in Procept's reported surgical volumes and equipment utilization rates, raising doubts about the company's metrics.
Procept&#8217;s statements regarding its robotic and AI capabilities have faced scrutiny. Critics, including Spruce Point Capital Management, argue that the system&#8217;s reliance on sales representatives during procedures and the need for surgeon expertise undermines its &#8220;automation&#8221; narrative. The HYDROS system, introduced with promises of AI-driven advancements, has been met with mixed feedback, with some urologists finding its features underwhelming.
Despite Procept&#8217;s $4.7 billion market valuation and premium revenue multiple, Spruce Point argues that its niche product, structural barriers to growth, and questionable metrics make its valuation unsustainable. The firm estimates Procept's fair value at $29 to $54 per share, implying substantial downside risk.
Price Action: PRCT stock is down 1.79% at $76.91 at last check Thursday.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43034421/whats-going-on-with-rtx-corporation-stock-today" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RTX Lands $529M Contract To Bolster Dutch Missile Defense: Details</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Health Care

General

ISRG

PRCT

Spruce Point Sees Trouble Ahead For Procept BioRobotics

Scotiabank analyst Allan Verkhovski maintains Monday.Com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MNDY#NASDAQ">MNDY</a>) with a Sector Outperform and lowers the price target from $325 to $300.

MNDY

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Monday.Com, Lowers Price Target to $300

Wingstop's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WING#NYSE">WING</a>) short percent of float has fallen 3.55% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 1.74 million shares sold short, which is 5.98% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.59 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Wingstop Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737056724_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Wingstop has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Wingstop's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Wingstop's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.30%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

WING

Looking Into Wingstop's Recent Short Interest

Navitas Semiconductor's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVTS#NYSE">NVTS</a>) short percent of float has risen 16.42% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 29.11 million shares sold short, which is 22.62% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.64 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Navitas Semiconductor Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737056719_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Navitas Semiconductor has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Navitas Semiconductor's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Navitas Semiconductor's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.51%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Comments

Samara Asset Group

News

Latest news for Samara Asset Group (OTC:CAGPF) Stock

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga