Option chain shows key data for Cantor Equity Partners I's stock options at various strike prices and expiration dates. Traders use this information to analyze potential trades and assess market sentiment for Cantor Equity Partners I.

Cantor Equity Partners I (NASDAQ:CEPO) Stock, Option Chain

Cantor Equity Partners I Inc is a blank check company.

Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc. - Class A Ordinary Shares

Cantor Equity Partners I Inc

Macro Economic Events

News

Econ #s

Economics

Michigan Current Conditions For January 77.9 Vs 75.1 Prior

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully assess companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Netflix (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>) against its key competitors in the Entertainment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Netflix Background</h3>
Netflix's relatively simple business model involves only one business, its streaming service. It has the biggest television entertainment subscriber base in both the United States and the collective international market, with more than 280 million subscribers globally. Netflix has exposure to nearly the entire global population outside of China. The firm has traditionally avoided live programming or sports content, instead focusing on on-demand access to episodic television, movies, and documentaries. The firm recently began introducing ad-supported subscription plans, giving the firm exposure to the advertising market in addition to the subscription fees that have historically accounted for nearly all its revenue.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Netflix Inc</td>
<td>49.46</td>
<td>16.46</td>
<td>10.26</td>
<td>10.54%</td>
<td>$6.69</td>
<td>$4.7</td>
<td>15.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Live Nation Entertainment Inc</td>
<td>146.42</td>
<td>104.35</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>324.7%</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>$1.87</td>
<td>-6.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tencent Music Entertainment Group</td>
<td>20.94</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>4.51</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$2.17</td>
<td>$2.99</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Warner Music Group Corp</td>
<td>35.30</td>
<td>29.30</td>
<td>2.36</td>
<td>8.19%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>2.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scienjoy Holding Corp</td>
<td>5.71</td>
<td>0.22</td>
<td>0.18</td>
<td>0.06%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>-12.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>52.09</td>
<td>34.0</td>
<td>2.08</td>
<td>83.87%</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>$1.43</td>
<td>-2.38%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After thoroughly examining Netflix, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 49.46 significantly below the industry average by 0.95x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 16.46, which is 0.48x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 10.26, which is 4.93x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.54%, which is 73.33% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $6.69 Billion, which is 8.47x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $4.7 Billion, which indicates 3.29x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 15.02% is notably higher compared to the industry average of -2.38%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521251_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Netflix with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
In the context of the debt-to-equity ratio, Netflix holds a middle position among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates a moderate level of debt relative to its equity with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.7, which implies a relatively balanced financial structure with a reasonable debt-equity mix.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Netflix, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB ratio is also low, suggesting a possible bargain opportunity. However, the PS ratio is high, signaling overvaluation based on revenue. In terms of ROE, Netflix shows lower profitability compared to peers. EBITDA and gross profit margins are high, reflecting strong operational performance. Additionally, Netflix's revenue growth rate is high, outperforming industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

Trading Ideas

NFLX

Insights Into Netflix's Performance Versus Peers In Entertainment Sector

Michigan Consumer Expectations For January 70.2 Vs 73.3 Prior

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Tesla (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>) and its primary competitors in the Automobiles industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Tesla Background</h3>
Tesla is a vertically integrated battery electric vehicle automaker and developer of autonomous driving software. The company has multiple vehicles in its fleet, which include luxury and midsize sedans, crossover SUVs, a light truck, and a semi truck. Tesla also plans to begin selling more affordable vehicles, a sports car, and a robotaxi. Global deliveries in 2024 were a little below 1.8 million vehicles. The company sells batteries for stationary storage for residential and commercial properties including utilities and solar panels and solar roofs for energy generation. Tesla also owns a fast-charging network.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Tesla Inc</td>
<td>108.20</td>
<td>18.13</td>
<td>14.19</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$4.22</td>
<td>$5.0</td>
<td>7.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Toyota Motor Corp</td>
<td>9.62</td>
<td>1.16</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>1.64%</td>
<td>$1449.68</td>
<td>$2438.49</td>
<td>0.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thor Industries Inc</td>
<td>24.29</td>
<td>1.25</td>
<td>0.53</td>
<td>-0.05%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>-14.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>16.95</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>0.71</td>
<td>0.79%</td>
<td>$724.88</td>
<td>$1219.38</td>
<td>-7.11%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a thorough examination of Tesla, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 108.2, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio significantly exceeds the industry average by 6.38x, suggesting a premium valuation relative to industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 18.13, which is 14.98x the industry average, Tesla might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 14.19, which is 19.99x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 3.18% that is 2.39% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $4.22 Billion, which is 0.01x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $5.0 Billion, which indicates 0.0x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 7.85% is notably higher compared to the industry average of -7.11%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521237_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Tesla can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Tesla is positioned in the middle among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a relatively balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a moderate level of debt while also utilizing equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
In comparison to its peers in the Automobiles industry, Tesla's PE, PB, and PS ratios are all considered high, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. On the other hand, Tesla's high ROE and revenue growth suggest strong performance relative to its competitors. However, the low EBITDA and gross profit figures may raise concerns about the company's operational efficiency and profitability.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

TSLA

In-Depth Analysis: Tesla Versus Competitors In Automobiles Industry

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) against its key competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>28.82</td>
<td>9.37</td>
<td>10.25</td>
<td>9.77%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>18.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>96.47</td>
<td>7.21</td>
<td>6.18</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>320.33</td>
<td>1.98</td>
<td>2.94</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>23.79</td>
<td>3.47</td>
<td>2.02</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>11.90</td>
<td>0.40</td>
<td>1.09</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>39.08</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.25</td>
<td>0.62</td>
<td>1.35</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>58</td>
<td>2.23</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>7.39</td>
<td>0.78</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vtex</td>
<td>126.60</td>
<td>4.21</td>
<td>5.01</td>
<td>1.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shutterstock Inc</td>
<td>30.07</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>1.22</td>
<td>3.38%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>7.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZipRecruiter Inc</td>
<td>227</td>
<td>48.96</td>
<td>1.36</td>
<td>-13.52%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-24.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yalla Group Ltd</td>
<td>5.32</td>
<td>0.93</td>
<td>2.19</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-4.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>79.35</td>
<td>6.18</td>
<td>2.27</td>
<td>1.18%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 28.82 is 0.36x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 9.37, which is 1.52x the industry average, Meta Platforms might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 10.25, which is 4.52x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.77% that is 8.59% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion is 245.11x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 97.68x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 18.87%, outperforming the industry average of 0.2%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521227_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Meta Platforms with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
Meta Platforms has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest the market values the company's assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comparing Meta Platforms With Industry Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Software industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>35.06</td>
<td>10.97</td>
<td>12.48</td>
<td>8.87%</td>
<td>$38.23</td>
<td>$45.49</td>
<td>16.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>39.89</td>
<td>33.19</td>
<td>8.44</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>163.41</td>
<td>23.30</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>22.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>44.83</td>
<td>19.18</td>
<td>14.81</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>528.79</td>
<td>11.67</td>
<td>12.89</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>26.81</td>
<td>1.38</td>
<td>24.42</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>29.67</td>
<td>10.94</td>
<td>8.51</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>36.61</td>
<td>23.83</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>34.05</td>
<td>6.38</td>
<td>3.93</td>
<td>6.88%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>63.91</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N-able Inc</td>
<td>47.10</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>3.86</td>
<td>1.44%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>8.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OneSpan Inc</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>3.61</td>
<td>2.94</td>
<td>4.43%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>94.55</td>
<td>12.5</td>
<td>9.58</td>
<td>8.32%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>8.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When conducting a detailed analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become clear: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 35.06 is 0.37x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 10.97, which is well below the industry average by 0.88x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 12.48, which is 1.3x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.87% is 0.55% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.23 Billion is 58.82x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $45.49 Billion, which indicates 33.7x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 16.04%, outperforming the industry average of 8.7%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521217_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Microsoft with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Microsoft has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the company is undervalued compared to its peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies that the market values Microsoft's sales more than its earnings or assets. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth indicate strong financial performance and operational efficiency relative to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Performance Comparison: Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry

Michigan 1-Year Inflation Expectations For January 3.3% Vs 2.8% Prior

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>55.31</td>
<td>52.07</td>
<td>30.75</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>33.49</td>
<td>8.82</td>
<td>13.27</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
<td>$555.05</td>
<td>$439.35</td>
<td>38.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>17.79</td>
<td>6.73</td>
<td>4.61</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>35.62</td>
<td>10.12</td>
<td>11.20</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-8.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>28.48</td>
<td>2.37</td>
<td>3.84</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>70.01</td>
<td>12.88</td>
<td>14.90</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>39.15</td>
<td>4.82</td>
<td>5.58</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>14.47</td>
<td>2.89</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>10.40</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>-26.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.20</td>
<td>1.43</td>
<td>2.29</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>25.10</td>
<td>2.34</td>
<td>3.58</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>130.34</td>
<td>8.90</td>
<td>13.67</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>54.73</td>
<td>10.95</td>
<td>13.75</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>30.46</td>
<td>4.54</td>
<td>11.23</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>35.45</td>
<td>5.86</td>
<td>12.07</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>38.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Impinj Inc</td>
<td>163.38</td>
<td>31.05</td>
<td>13.37</td>
<td>0.17%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>46.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Synaptics Inc</td>
<td>19.60</td>
<td>2.15</td>
<td>3.21</td>
<td>-1.57%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>8.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>44.92</td>
<td>7.32</td>
<td>8.23</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>$37.29</td>
<td>$29.72</td>
<td>10.45%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through an analysis of NVIDIA, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
Notably, the current Price to Earnings ratio for this stock, 55.31, is 1.23x above the industry norm, reflecting a higher valuation relative to the industry.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 52.07 relative to the industry average by 7.11x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 30.75, which is 3.74x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% is 27.23% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.61x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.88x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 93.61%, which surpasses the industry average of 10.45%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521208_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
NVIDIA demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.
</li>
<li>
With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For NVIDIA, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to industry peers, indicating a potentially overvalued stock. On the other hand, the high ROE and revenue growth suggest strong performance and market position within the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the low EBITDA and gross profit levels may raise concerns about operational efficiency and profitability compared to competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Assessing NVIDIA's Performance Against Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Looking into the current session, Sanofi Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SNY#NASDAQ">SNY</a>) shares are trading at $49.35, after a 0.24% increase. Moreover, over the past month, the stock went up by 5.45%, but in the past year, fell by 4.29%. Shareholders might be interested in knowing whether the stock is undervalued, even if the company is performing up to par in the current session. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521209_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>How Does Sanofi P/E Compare to Other Companies?</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
Sanofi has a better P/E ratio of 26.52 than the aggregate P/E ratio of 24.59 of the Pharmaceuticals industry. Ideally, one might believe that Sanofi Inc. might perform better in the future than it's industry group, but it's probable that the stock is overvalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521209_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In summary, while the price-to-earnings ratio is a valuable tool for investors to evaluate a company's market performance, it should be used with caution. A low P/E ratio can be an indication of undervaluation, but it can also suggest weak growth prospects or financial instability. Moreover, the P/E ratio is just one of many metrics that investors should consider when making investment decisions, and it should be evaluated alongside other financial ratios, industry trends, and qualitative factors. By taking a comprehensive approach to analyzing a company's financial health, investors can make well-informed decisions that are more likely to lead to successful outcomes.

Intraday Update

Price Over Earnings Overview: Sanofi

Sui's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/">SUI</a>) price has increased 8.25% over the past 24 hours to $4.98. Over the past week, SUI has experienced an uptick of over 9.0%, moving from $4.5 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $5.35. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Sui over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521206_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
Sui's trading volume has climbed 179.0% over the past week, moving in tandem, directionally, with the overall circulating supply of the coin, which has increased 0.19%. This brings the circulating supply to 3.01 billion, which makes up an estimated 30.1% of its max supply of 10.00 billion. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for SUI is #13 at $14.91 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521206_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$SUI

Sui Up More Than 8% In 24 hours

Michigan Consumer Sentiment For January 73.2 Vs 74.0 Est.; 74.0 Prior

WIIM

ZCAR

Zoomcar shares are trading higher after the company reported select financial performance metrics for Dec. 2024.

Argus Research analyst John Staszak maintains Expedia Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EXPE#NASDAQ">EXPE</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $210 to $220.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

EXPE

Argus Research Maintains Buy on Expedia Group, Raises Price Target to $220

JBLU

Shares of airline stocks are trading higher in sympathy with Delta, which rose after reporting strong Q4 financial results.

Delta Air Lines shares are trading higher after the company reported better-than-expected Q4 results and issued 2025 guidance.

Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods analyst Meyer Shields maintains Aon (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AON#NYSE">AON</a>) with a Outperform and lowers the price target from $415 to $411.

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Maintains Outperform on Aon, Lowers Price Target to $411

Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods analyst Ryan Krueger maintains Ameriprise Finl (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMP#NYSE">AMP</a>) with a Market Perform and lowers the price target from $565 to $560.

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Maintains Market Perform on Ameriprise Finl, Lowers Price Target to $560

Keybanc analyst Aleksey Yefremov maintains Trade Desk (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TTD#NASDAQ">TTD</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $130 to $140.

Keybanc Maintains Overweight on Trade Desk, Raises Price Target to $140

Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods analyst Meyer Shields maintains Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Outperform and raises the price target from $235 to $243.

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Maintains Outperform on Allstate, Raises Price Target to $243

Keybanc analyst Aleksey Yefremov maintains Spotify Technology (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPOT#NYSE">SPOT</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $520 to $555.

Comments

Cantor Equity Partners I

Cantor Equity Partners I (CEPO) Options

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga