iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (ARCA: IBDV)

Latest news for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (ARCA:IBDV)

The Fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component instruments of the Underlying Index, and (except during the last twelve months of the Funds operations) the Fund will invest at least 90% of its assets in fixed income securities of the types included in the Underlying Index that BFA believes will help the Fund track the Underlying Index. The Fund will invest no more than 10% of its assets in futures, options and swaps contracts that BFA believes will help the Fund track the Underlying Index as well as in fixed income securities other than the types included in the Underlying Index, but which BFA believes will help the Fund track the Underlying Index

iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF

This potential collaboration aims to leverage the complementary strengths of both companies to accelerate growth and innovation across the biotechnology and consumer health sectors.

News

Euda Health Holdings Limited - Ordinary Shares

EUDA

EUDA Enters Preliminary Discussions With Guangdong Cell Biotech To Form Joint Venture

It is payable on February 7, 2025, to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 24, 2025.&nbsp;

Dividends

Pentair Boosts Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend From $0.23 To $0.25 Per Share

Quipt Home Medical (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/QIPT#NASDAQ">QIPT</a>) reported quarterly sales of $61.30 million which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $64.40 million by 4.81 percent.&nbsp;

Earnings

Earnings Misses

QIPT

Quipt Home Medical Q4 Sales $61.30M Miss $64.40M Estimate

During the last three months, 5 analysts shared their evaluations of Par Pacific Hldgs (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PARR#NYSE">PARR</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $25.8, with a high estimate of $30.00 and a low estimate of $22.00. This current average has decreased by 18.87% from the previous average price target of $31.80. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386453_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Par Pacific Hldgs. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Nitin Kumar</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Neil Mehta</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nitin Kumar</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Royall</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Todd</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Par Pacific Hldgs. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Par Pacific Hldgs compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Par Pacific Hldgs's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Par Pacific Hldgs's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PARR/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Par Pacific Hldgs analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Discovering Par Pacific Hldgs: A Closer Look</h2>
Par Pacific Holdings Inc is an oil and gas company that manages and maintains interests in energy and infrastructure businesses. The company has three reportable segments namely Refining, Under its refining business, the company produces ultra-low-sulfur diesel, gasoline, jet fuel, marine fuel, LSFO, and other associated refined products. Its Retail includes operation licenses out brands to serve the retail consumer. Through the Logistics segment, crude shipments are delivered to the refineries, in addition to finished products that are exported. It generates maximum revenue from the Refining segment.
<h3>Par Pacific Hldgs: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Par Pacific Hldgs faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -16.88% in revenue growth as of 30 September, 2024. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Net Margin: Par Pacific Hldgs's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of 0.35%, the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Par Pacific Hldgs's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 0.59%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Par Pacific Hldgs's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 0.19%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 1.2, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings

PARR

What 5 Analyst Ratings Have To Say About Par Pacific Hldgs

Capri Holdings (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CPRI#NYSE">CPRI</a>) has been analyzed by 11 analysts in the last three months, revealing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $25.18, a high estimate of $42.00, and a low estimate of $19.00. This current average has decreased by 31.54% from the previous average price target of $36.78. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386444_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Diving into Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Exploration</h2>
A clear picture of Capri Holdings's perception among financial experts is painted with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Boss</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$15.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Robert Drbul</td>
<td>Guggenheim</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adrienne Yih</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oliver Chen</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Altschwager</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Boss</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ike Boruchow</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ike Boruchow</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Capri Holdings. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analyzing trends, analysts offer qualitative evaluations, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Capri Holdings compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts gauge the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Capri Holdings's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of Capri Holdings's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CPRI/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Capri Holdings analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Capri Holdings</h2>
Michael Kors, Versace, and Jimmy Choo are the brands of Capri Holdings, a marketer, distributor, and retailer of upscale accessories and apparel. Michael Kors, Capri's largest brand, offers handbags, footwear, and apparel through more than 700 company-owned stores, wholesale, and e-commerce. Versace (acquired in 2018) is known for its ready-to-wear luxury fashion, while Jimmy Choo (acquired in 2017) is best known for women's luxury footwear. John Idol has served as CEO since 2003.
<h3>Capri Holdings: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Revenue Growth: Capri Holdings's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -16.42%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Capri Holdings's net margin is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 2.22%, the company may encounter challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Capri Holdings's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 1.57%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.36%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 2.34, Capri Holdings faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

CPRI

Capri Holdings Stock: A Deep Dive Into Analyst Perspectives (11 Ratings)

Broadcom Inc.&#8216;s (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>) stock price soared 38% over two sessions — its strongest two-day rally since <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/what-does-ipo-mean">going public in 2009</a>.
A blowout earnings report, bullish analyst updates, and promising artificial intelligence (AI) developments vaulted the semiconductor company into the elite <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/12/42488220/broadcom-hits-1-trillion-milestone-the-next-magnificent-tech-giant">trillion-dollar market-cap club.</a>
The impressive surge began on Friday, following <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/12/42480891/broadcom-reports-four-fold-increase-in-ai-chips-revenue-expects-continued-momentum-boasts-of-cost-reduction-in-vmware-after-acquisition-heres-what-happened">Broadcom&#8217;s latest earnings announcement</a>, with shares climbing 24.4% in a single day. The momentum continued into Monday, where the stock advanced another 11%, pushing Broadcom&#8217;s market cap from $850 billion to $1.17 trillion in just 48 hours. 
This achievement places the company alongside tech giants such as Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), Microsoft Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NYSE">MSFT</a>), NVIDIA Corp. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>), Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>) (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>), Amazon Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>), Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>), and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>).
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Earnings and AI Tailwinds Fuel Optimism</h3>
Broadcom released earnings after the market closed last Thursday. Investors felt encouraged by the company's robust revenue growth due to surging demand for AI-related chips.
The semiconductor manufacturer also revealed its ongoing collaboration with Apple to develop a custom AI chip, underscoring its expanding role in enabling next-generation AI technology.
Adding to the bullish sentiment, Goldman Sachs analyst Toshiya Hari reiterated on Monday a "Buy" rating for Broadcom and raised the stock's 12-month price target from $190 to $240, labeling the company as a "key enabler of generative AI."
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Leveraged ETF Gains: Direxion AVL Nearly Doubles</h3>
Broadcom&#8217;s stock surge also had a dramatic impact on the Direxion Daily Broadcom Bull 2X Shares ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVL#NASDAQ">AVL</a>), which offers leveraged exposure to the company's daily stock performance.
In just two sessions, the ETF skyrocketed 84%, reflecting Broadcom&#8217;s remarkable gains. 
The leveraged ETF&#8217;s performance highlights the outsized potential returns — and risks — of these high-magnitude investment vehicles during periods of strong market momentum.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Catch Up On Benzinga's Latest Broadcom Updates:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/insights/options/24/12/42516743/broadcoms-options-a-look-at-what-the-big-money-is-thinking">Broadcom&#8217;s Options: A Look at What the Big Money is Thinking</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/24/12/42515044/broadcom-tesla-propel-nasdaq-100-gains-bitcoin-hits-107000-fueling-crypto-stocks-rally-whats-driving-markets-monday">Broadcom, Tesla Propel Nasdaq 100 Gains, Bitcoin Hits $107,000, Fuels Crypto Stocks Rally: What&#8217;s Driving Markets Monday?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/12/42489281/broadcoms-ai-chip-leadership-puts-pressure-on-nvidia-and-marvell-analysts-say">Broadcom&#8217;s AI Chip Leadership Puts Pressure on Nvidia and Marvell, Analysts Say</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/12/42487128/apples-2025-chip-transition-targets-new-wireless-edge-broadcom-to-retain-key-role">Apple&#8217;s 2025 Chip Transition Targets New Wireless Edge, Broadcom To Retain Key Role</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Equities

Large Cap

Specialty ETFs

Tech

ETFs

AAPL

AMZN

AVGO

GOOG

GOOGL

MSFT

NVDA

TSLA

Broadcom Mounts Strongest 2-Day Rally Since IPO: Leveraged ETF Nearly Doubles In 2 Sessions

Ratings for BorgWarner (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BWA#NYSE">BWA</a>) were provided by 6 analysts in the past three months, showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated BorgWarner and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $41.5, accompanied by a high estimate of $50.00 and a low estimate of $36.00. This current average has not changed from the previous average price target. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386435_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive BorgWarner. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Colin Langan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ronald Jewsikow</td>
<td>Guggenheim</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Edison Yu</td>
<td>Deutsche Bank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$39.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Brinkman</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris McNally</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
<td>$39.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kash Rangan</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to BorgWarner. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of BorgWarner compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for BorgWarner's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of BorgWarner's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BWA/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on BorgWarner analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind BorgWarner</h2>
BorgWarner is a Tier I auto-parts supplier with three operating segments. The air management group makes turbochargers, e-boosters, e-turbos, timing systems, emissions systems, thermal systems, gasoline ignition technology, powertrain sensors, and cabin heaters. The drivetrain and battery systems group produces automatic transmission components, torque management products, battery heaters, battery charging, and battery modules. The e-propulsion segment makes e-motors, power electronics, and software and control modules. The company's largest customers are Ford and Volkswagen at 14% and 11% of 2023 revenue, respectively. Geographically, Europe accounted for 36% of 2023 revenue, while Asia and North America were 34% and 29% apiece.
<h3>Financial Insights: BorgWarner</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Revenue Growth: BorgWarner's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -4.78%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 6.78%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 3.82%, the company showcases effective utilization of equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): BorgWarner's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 1.6%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: BorgWarner's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.77, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Breaking Down BorgWarner: 6 Analysts Share Their Views

Analysts' ratings for Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MGY#NYSE">MGY</a>) over the last quarter vary from bullish to bearish, as provided by 4 analysts.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $28.5, accompanied by a high estimate of $33.00 and a low estimate of $22.00. Highlighting a 4.2% decrease, the current average has fallen from the previous average price target of $29.75. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386426_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>William Janela</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Neal Dingmann</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hanwen Chang</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Neal Dingmann</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analyzing trends, analysts offer qualitative evaluations, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MGY/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas</h2>
Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas Corp is an independent oil and natural gas company engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquid (NGL) reserves. The Company's oil and natural gas properties are located in Karnes County and the Giddings area in South Texas, where the Company targets the Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk formations. Its objective is to generate stock market value over the long term through consistent organic production growth, high full-cycle operating margins, and an efficient capital program with short economic paybacks. The company's operating segment is acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil and natural gas properties located in the United States.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas</h3>
Market Capitalization Perspectives: The company's market capitalization falls below industry averages, signaling a relatively smaller size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 5.53% as of 30 September, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Energy sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional net margin, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable net margin of 29.59%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 5.29%, the company showcases effective utilization of equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 3.49%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: Magnolia Oil &amp; Gas's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.21, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

4 Analysts Assess Magnolia Oil & Gas: What You Need To Know

ACV Auctions (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ACVA#NASDAQ">ACVA</a>) has been analyzed by 8 analysts in the last three months, revealing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $24.62, with a high estimate of $27.00 and a low estimate of $18.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 8.84% from the previous average price target of $22.62.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386417_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive ACV Auctions. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Boone</td>
<td>JMP Securities</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Outperform</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ronald Josey</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Naved Khan</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Pierce</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Pierce</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Potter</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$16.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gary Prestopino</td>
<td>Barrington Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Colantuoni</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to ACV Auctions. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of ACV Auctions compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of ACV Auctions's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into ACV Auctions's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ACVA/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on ACV Auctions analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About ACV Auctions</h2>
ACV Auctions Inc is a mobile platform for wholesale car auctions. It provides a digital marketplace for wholesale vehicle transactions and data services that offer transparent and accurate vehicle information for customers.
<h3>ACV Auctions: Delving into Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Revenue Growth: ACV Auctions's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 43.96%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Industrials sector.
Net Margin: ACV Auctions's net margin is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of -9.36%, the company may encounter challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): ACV Auctions's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of -3.51%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): ACV Auctions's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -1.57%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.
Debt Management: The company maintains a balanced debt approach with a debt-to-equity ratio below industry norms, standing at 0.25.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

ACVA

A Glimpse Into The Expert Outlook On ACV Auctions Through 8 Analysts

During the last three months, 15 analysts shared their evaluations of Summit Materials (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SUM#NYSE">SUM</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $51.2, a high estimate of $60.00, and a low estimate of $41.00. This upward trend is apparent, with the current average reflecting a 2.13% increase from the previous average price target of $50.13.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386409_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Summit Materials is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Philip Ng</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Keith Hughes</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Pettinari</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Garik Shmois</td>
<td>Loop Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adrian Heurta</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Dahl</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Thielman</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Garik Shmois</td>
<td>Loop Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Dahl</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Keith Hughes</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adam Seiden</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$52.00</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Thielman</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philip Ng</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Pettinari</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adrian Heurta</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Summit Materials. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Summit Materials compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Summit Materials's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Summit Materials's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/SUM/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Summit Materials analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About Summit Materials</h2>
Summit Materials Inc is engaged in the production and sale of aggregates, cement, ready-mix concrete, asphalt paving mix and concrete products and owns and operates quarries, sand and gravel pits, two cement plants, cement distribution terminals, ready-mix concrete plants, asphalt plants and landfill sites. It is also engaged in paving and related services. The Company's three operating and reporting segments are the West, East and Cement segments. It operates in 21 U.S. states and in British Columbia, Canada and has assets in 21 U.S. states and in British Columbia, Canada through its platform.
<h3>Summit Materials's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Revenue Growth: Over the 3 months period, Summit Materials showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of 47.35% as of 30 September, 2024. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Materials sector.
Net Margin: Summit Materials's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 8.98%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Summit Materials's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 2.4%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Summit Materials's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of 1.26%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: Summit Materials's debt-to-equity ratio surpasses industry norms, standing at 0.65. This suggests the company carries a substantial amount of debt, posing potential financial challenges.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

15 Analysts Have This To Say About Summit Materials

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JPM#NYSE">JPM</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 1.07% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 9.48%. Currently, JPMorgan Chase has a market capitalization of $674.67 billion. 
Buying $1000 In JPM: If an investor had bought $1000 of JPM stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $6,138.36 today based on a price of $239.64 for JPM at the time of writing.
<h3>JPMorgan Chase's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734386408_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

If You Invested $1000 In This Stock 20 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

Guidance

RICK

RCI Hospitality Sets FY29 Revenue Target Of $400M; Free Cash Flow Of $75M

&nbsp;
This increase brings the annual dividend rate to $3.30 per share, up from $3.00, and marks the company&#39;s twenty-second consecutive year of dividend increases. It is expected that the first increased dividend will be paid in March of 2025.

Waste Management Boosts Quarterly Dividend Rate For 2025 By 10% From $0.75 To $0.825 Per Share

On December 13, 2024, BlueOval SK, LLC ("BOSK" or the "Borrower"), a 50/50 joint venture company among Ford Motor Company ("Ford"), SK On Co., Ltd. ("SK On"), and SK Battery America, Inc. ("SKBA," a wholly owned subsidiary of SK On), entered into a Loan Arrangement and Reimbursement Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") pursuant to which the Department of Energy ("DOE") agreed to arrange for the Federal Financing Bank to purchase a note or notes from the Borrower and to make advances from time to time thereunder up to $9,633,040,000 (the "BOSK DOE Loan") to finance the construction of battery manufacturing plants in Tennessee and Kentucky. BOSK is a consolidated subsidiary of SK On.
 &nbsp;
In conjunction with the Loan Agreement, on December 13, 2024, each of Ford, SK On, SKBA, and SK Innovation Co., Ltd., entered into a Sponsor Support, Share Retention and Subordination Agreement (the "SSA") with BOSK and DOE. Under the SSA, Ford has agreed to guarantee 50% of BOSK's payment obligations under the BOSK DOE Loan.
 &nbsp;
The SSA contains affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Ford that are substantially similar to those in Ford's existing Credit Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006, as amended and restated as of November 24, 2009, as amended and restated as of April 30, 2014, as amended and restated as of April 30, 2015, and as further amended and restated as of September 29, 2021 (and as amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Existing Credit Agreement"). The affirmative covenants include delivery of Ford's financial statements, delivery of compliance certificates and notices of default, and maintenance of Ford's automotive business and corporate existence. The negative covenants, subject to certain exceptions, include limitations on Ford's ability to merge or consolidate with another person, a limitation on liens, a negative pledge, and a limitation on sale-leaseback transactions. The SSA also contains a negative covenant substantially similar to the liquidity covenant in the Existing Credit Agreement requiring that Ford not permit Available Liquidity (as defined in the SSA) to be less than $4,000,000,000.
 &nbsp;
The SSA includes certain events of default, defined as "Ford Sponsor Entity Defaults," the occurrence of which would constitute an event of default under the Loan Agreement. The Ford Sponsor Entity Defaults are substantially similar to those in Ford's Existing Credit Agreement, including:
 &nbsp;
•Any representation or warranty is materially incorrect;
•Breach of covenants in the SSA, subject to grace periods consistent with the Existing Credit Agreement;
•Cross-payment default with respect to debt for borrowed money of Ford or any significant guarantor in an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $1,000,000,000 or more;
•Cross-acceleration to indebtedness for borrowed money of Ford or any significant guarantor with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $1,000,000,000 or more;
•Bankruptcy of Ford, Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, Ford Canada, or any significant guarantor;
•Occurrence of certain ERISA events; and
•U.S. judgments against Ford or any significant guarantor not vacated, discharged, satisfied, stayed, or bonded pending appeal within 60 days, that involve a liability of either (a) $100,000,000 (or the foreign currency equivalent thereof) or more, in the case of any single judgment or decree or (b) $200,000,000 (or the foreign currency equivalent thereof) or more in the aggregate.
 &nbsp;
The final maturity date of the BOSK DOE Loan is expected to be in July 2040.

Contracts

BlueOval SK, A 50/50 Joint Venture Company Among Ford Motor, SK On Co. And SK Battery America Entered Into A Loan Arrangement And Reimbursement Agreement, Where The DOE Agreed To Arrange For The Federal Financing Bank To Purchase A Note Up To $9,633,040,000 To Finance The Construction Of Battery Manufacturing Plants In Tennessee And Kentucky; Ford Has Agreed To Guarantee 50% Of BOSK's Payment Obligations Under The Loan

Red Cat Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RCAT#NASDAQ">RCAT</a>) reported second-quarter financial results for fiscal year 2025 after the bell on Monday. Here&#8217;s a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/24/12/g42517778/red-cat-holdings-reports-financial-results-for-fiscal-second-quarter-2025-and-provides-corporate-u">rundown of the report</a>.
What Happened: Red Cat reported second-quarter revenue of $1.53 million, missing <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/earnings" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">analyst estimates</a> of $4.13 million. The drone technology company reported a second-quarter loss of 18 cents per share, missing analyst estimates for a loss of eight cents per share, according to <a href="http://pro.benzinga.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benzinga Pro</a>.
&#8220;In the second half of 2024, our company decided to focus on the Black Widow, anticipating its success in the SRR final production contract,&#8221; said&nbsp;Jeff Thompson, CEO of Red Cat.&nbsp;
&#8220;We halted production of the Teal 2 to retool for the Black Widow, prioritizing long-term growth over short-term revenue. This strategy has proven successful, enabling us to meet the demands of the new Army contract and all other Black Widow sales and programs of record while managing critical technology integration through our Red Cat Futures Initiative partners. We are now well-positioned to fulfill these demands.&#8221;
Red Cat ended the quarter with $5.7 million in cash and accounts receivable. The company noted that it has closed on an additional $6 million in financing since the end of the quarter. 
Check This Out: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/12/42507816/taiwan-semiconductor-ceo-highlights-ai-powered-drones-next-gen-robots-as-growth-drivers">Taiwan Semiconductor CEO Highlights AI-Powered Drones, Next-Gen Robots As Growth Drivers</a>
What&#8217;s Next: Red Cat expects full-year revenue for calendar year 2025 of $80 to $120 million. 
&#8220;We are also pleased to announce our partnership with Palantir. With Palantir&#8217;s Artificial Intelligence and visual navigation, we believe the Black Widow is one of the most capable drones ever fielded by the Department of Defense. This rucksack-portable drone, powered by Palantir&#8217;s software, will boost revenue per drone and increase gross margins,&#8221; Thompson said. 
Red Cat on Monday announced a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/12/42513150/palantir-expands-ai-battlefield-solutions-with-red-cats-black-widow-drones">partnership</a> with Palantir Technologies Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLTR#NASDAQ">PLTR</a>) to integrate navigation software into its Black Widow drones. The collaboration is expected to help transform autonomous small unmanned aircraft systems operations for modern warfare.
Red Cat&#8217;s management team will further discuss highlights from the quarter on a call with analysts and investors at 4:30 p.m. ET.
RCAT Price Action: <a href="http://benzinga.com/quote/rcat" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Red Cat Holdings shares</a> were down 13.88% in after-hours, trading at $9.04 at the time of publication Monday, according to <a href="http://pro.benzinga.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Photo: MAcroEcon via Shutterstock

After-Hours Center

Movers

PLTR

RCAT

Red Cat Holdings Q2 Earnings: Revenue, EPS Miss Estimates As Drone Company Prioritizes Long-Term Growth Over Short-Term Sales

Compass Minerals Sees Salt Sales Volumes For 2025 At The Midpoint Of Guidance Are Expected To Increase ~9% Over 2024, Assuming Average Sales-To-Commitment Ratios

The Securities and Exchange Commission approved spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, which was a groundbreaking move at the time. The Bitcoin ETFs continue to see huge inflows months<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/24/12/42393396/record-week-bitcoin-etfs-net-25-billion-in-inflows-ethereum-etfs-took-in-12-billion"> after their launch.</a>
Here's a look back at the multi-year battle to get Bitcoin ETFs approved and how much investors could have made buying Bitcoin (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/btc/usd">BTC</a>) when the first ETF was filed.
What Happened: Investors celebrated <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/24/01/36514679/wall-street-enters-the-crypto-age-sec-issues-historic-approval-of-spot-bitcoin-etfs" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the approval of </a>Bitcoin ETFs earlier this year, with the SEC approving the first applications for many ETFs.
The approval opened the door for more investors, including institutional investors and retirement accounts, to get exposure to the leading cryptocurrency through the launched ETFs.
Months after launch, Bitcoin ETFs are seeing strong inflows, which could be thanks in part to new optimism for the cryptocurrency sector after the 2024 election. Bitcoin hit new all-time highs<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/24/11/41778425/bitcoins-all-time-high-a-groundbreaking-milestone-and-strong-post-election-rally-coming-ex"> after the 2024 election</a> and recently surpassed the $100,000 milestone<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/24/12/42336184/exclusive-bitcoin-crossing-100000-is-a-defining-moment-experts-say"> for the first time.</a>
Last week, Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows of $2.5 billion, bringing the year-to-date total to more than $36 billion.
Here's a look at the top Bitcoin ETFs today by assets under management, as reported by <a href="https://etfdb.com/themes/bitcoin-etfs/">ETFdb</a>.
<ul>
<li>iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBIT#NASDAQ">IBIT</a>): $53.9 billion</li>
<li>Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GBTC#NYSE">GBTC</a>): $21.5 billion</li>
<li>Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FBTC#BATS">FBTC</a>): $21.0 billion</li>
<li>ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARKB#BATS">ARKB</a>): $4.9 billion</li>
<li>Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BITB#NYSE">BITB</a>): $4.1 billion</li>
<li>Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BTC#NYSE">BTC</a>): $4.0 billion</li>
<li>ProShares Bitcoin ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BITO#NYSE">BITO</a>): $2.6 billion</li>
<li>Volatility Shares Trust 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BITX#BATS">BITX</a>): $2.0 billion</li>
</ul>
Before the approved Bitcoin ETFs were filed, or the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust was launched in September 2013, there was an S-1 filed for a Bitcoin ETF with the SEC.
On July 1, 2013,&nbsp;Gemini&nbsp;founders&nbsp;Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss&nbsp;filed the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust as a planned Bitcoin ETF. The Winklevoss twins saw their initial filing and a second attempt rejected in 2018.
Cameron Winklevoss commented on the status of Bitcoin ETFs on the 10-year anniversary of the filing, which happened several months ago, <a href="https://twitter.com/cameron/status/1675302282915610624" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">saying</a>: "The SEC&#8217;s refusal to approve these products for a decade has been a complete and utter disaster for U.S. investors and demonstrates how the SEC is a failed regulator."
Winklevoss accused the SEC of helping to push investors into&nbsp;FTX, which&nbsp;<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/22/11/29681030/ftx-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">eventually went bankrupt</a>&nbsp;and was &#8220;one of the largest financial frauds in modern history.&#8221;
The Gemini co-founder wished luck to all the companies fighting to bring Bitcoin ETFs to market.
In January, ahead of the Bitcoin ETFs' approval, Cameron Winklevoss took to Twitter to share the optimism of Bitcoin ETFs.
&#8220;Today is 3,845 days in the making. Happy Bitcoin ETF Approval Day!&#8221; Winklevoss&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/cameron/status/1745122379594871057" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tweeted</a>.
Here&#8217;s a look back at investing in Bitcoin when the Winklevoss brothers filed for the first ETF launch.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/education/24/12/42345466/if-you-invested-1000-in-bitcoin-when-peter-schiff-said-btc-would-never-hit-100k-heres-how-much-youd-have-now">If You Invested $1,000 In Bitcoin When Peter Schiff Said BTC Would Never Hit $100K, Here&#8217;s How Much You&#8217;d Have Now</a>
Investing $1,000 in BTC: Bitcoin hit all-time highs of nearly $69,000 in November 2021 before breaking out to new highs this year, and has traded above $10,000 for many years. It may be surprising to some that Bitcoin traded below $100 during parts of 2012 and that year marked the first time the leading cryptocurrency hit the $1,000 level.
On July 1, 2013, Bitcoin traded for around $90.80. A $1,000 investment in Bitcoin could have purchased 11.0132 BTC at the time.
Based on a price of $106,478.56 at the time of publication, the $1,000 investment would be worth $1,172,669.68 today. This represents a hypothetical return of over 117,000% over the last 11 years.
Over the past decade, Bitcoin has delivered stronger returns than leading stocks and has outpaced the overall stock market.
For Comparison
<ul>
<li>A $1,000 investment in the&nbsp;SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPY#NYSE">SPY</a>), which tracks the S&amp;P 500, would be worth $3,736.80 today. This represents a gain of 273.7% over the last 11 years.</li>
<li>A $1,000 investment in&nbsp;Tesla Inc&nbsp;over the same time period would be worth $58,480.93 today. This represents a hypothetical return of 5,748.1% over the last 11 years.</li>
<li>A $1,000 investment in&nbsp;Apple Inc&nbsp;over the same time period would be worth $17,035.49 today. This represents a hypothetical return of 1,603.5% over the last 11 years.</li>
</ul>
While Bitcoin may not beat the market and leading stocks by the same amounts over the next decade, there is increased optimism that the new White House administration could continue to send the leading cryptocurrency higher.
Read Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/12/42399353/heres-how-much-100-in-bitcoin-could-be-worth-in-2030-if-cathie-woods-price-target-is-reached">Here&#8217;s How Much $100 In Bitcoin Could Be Worth In 2030 If Cathie Wood&#8217;s Price Target Is Reached</a></li>
</ul>
This article was previously published by Benzinga and has been updated.
Image created using artificial intelligence via Midjourney.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Education

$BTC

ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF

ARKB

Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

BITB

BITO

BITX

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund

FBTC

GBTC

IBIT

If You Invested $1,000 In Bitcoin When The First Bitcoin ETF Was Filed, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

Electrovaya Inc. ("Electrovaya" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ELVA#NASDAQ">ELVA</a>, TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ELVA#TSX">ELVA</a>), a leading lithium-ion battery technology and manufacturing company, is pleased to announce that the Company is commencing an underwritten public offering (the "Offering") of its common shares (the "Common Shares"). All of the shares are being offered by the Company.
The shares will be offered in the United States pursuant to a shelf registration statement (including a prospectus supplement thereto) previously filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on September 25, 2024 in accordance with the Multijurisdictional Disclosure System established between Canada and the United States, and will be qualified for distribution in the provinces and territories of Canada by way of a prospectus supplement to the Company's base shelf prospectus dated September 17, 2024, provided that no securities will be sold in the Province of Québec.
Roth Capital Partners, Raymond James Ltd. and Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC are acting as the co-lead book-running managers for the proposed Offering.

Offerings

ELVA

TSX:ELVA

Electrovaya Announces Proposed Public Offering Of Common Shares And Files Preliminary Prospectus Supplement; No Size Or Amount Disclosed

Insmed (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INSM#NASDAQ">INSM</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 5.78% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 17.1%. Currently, Insmed has a market capitalization of $13.19 billion. 
Buying $1000 In INSM: If an investor had bought $1000 of INSM stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $4,519.09 today based on a price of $73.75 for INSM at the time of writing.
<h3>Insmed's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734385511_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

INSM

If You Invested $1000 In This Stock 10 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

Netcapital (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NCPL#NASDAQ">NCPL</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(2.34) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(1.29) by 81.4 percent. This is a 192.86 percent decrease over earnings of $2.52 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $170.53 thousand which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $1.05 million by 83.84 percent. This is a 91.65 percent decrease over sales of $2.04 million the same period last year.

Comments

iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF

News

Latest news for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (ARCA:IBDV)

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga