FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (ARCA: IQDY)

Latest news for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (ARCA:IQDY)

FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund

Financial Services

Industrials

Consumer Cyclical

Basic Materials

Technology

Energy

Healthcare

Consumer Defensive

Communication Services

Real Estate

Other

Utilities

The index is designed to reflect the performance of a selection of companies that, in aggregate, possess greater financial strength and stability characteristics relative to the Northern Trust International Large Cap Index. The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the securities in the index.

BHP Billiton Ltd

Asml Holding Nv

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Hitachi Ltd

Tokyo Electron

L'Oreal Sa

Royal Bank Of Canada

Cie Financiere Richemont Sa Cl A

Long Ideas

News

Short Ideas

Dividends

Specialty ETFs

New ETFs

Emerging Market ETFs

Global

Intraday Update

Markets

Trading Ideas

ETFs

DVYA

DVYE

IQDY

NTRS

Three Attractive International Dividend ETFs

iShares Dow Jones International Select Dividend Income Fund

IQDE

IQDF

QDYN

Under The Hood: An ETF For International Income

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>46.88</td>
<td>8.90</td>
<td>3.78</td>
<td>6.19%</td>
<td>$32.08</td>
<td>$31.0</td>
<td>11.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>17.58</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>1.59</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
<td>$54.02</td>
<td>$92.47</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>9.63</td>
<td>3.53</td>
<td>2.80</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>60.32</td>
<td>21.54</td>
<td>4.71</td>
<td>10.37%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>35.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>11.24</td>
<td>1.60</td>
<td>0.35</td>
<td>5.22%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>38.64</td>
<td>9.44</td>
<td>1.37</td>
<td>1.74%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>15.60</td>
<td>5.47</td>
<td>3.08</td>
<td>11.59%</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>24.22</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>3.95</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>6.47</td>
<td>1.34</td>
<td>0.49</td>
<td>2.76%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>-9.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>11.14</td>
<td>3.50</td>
<td>1.04</td>
<td>6.37%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>-3.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>32.66</td>
<td>4.16</td>
<td>3.01</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>27.75</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.20</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>-3.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>15.28</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>22.28</td>
<td>3.79</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>5.09%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>6.32</td>
<td>0.41</td>
<td>0.09</td>
<td>0.58%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>-8.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groupon Inc</td>
<td>17.61</td>
<td>12.08</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>34.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-9.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>21.12</td>
<td>5.29</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>7.12%</td>
<td>$6.98</td>
<td>$14.45</td>
<td>7.84%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After a detailed analysis of Amazon.com, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
At 46.88, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio significantly exceeds the industry average by 2.22x, suggesting a premium valuation relative to industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 8.9 relative to the industry average by 1.68x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.78, surpassing the industry average by 2.26x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.19% that is 0.93% below the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.08 Billion, which is 4.6x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $31.0 Billion, which indicates 2.15x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 11.04% exceeds the industry average of 7.84%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830042_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Amazon.com in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Amazon.com has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. The low ROE suggests that Amazon.com is not generating significant returns on shareholder equity. However, the high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth show strong operational performance and potential for future growth within the industry sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Insights Into Amazon.com's Performance Versus Peers In Broadline Retail Sector

Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bearish stance on Unity Software.
Looking at options history for Unity Software (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/U#NYSE">U</a>) we detected 8 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 25% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 75% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 3 are puts, for a total amount of $96,191 and 5, calls, for a total amount of $218,699.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Taking into account the Volume and Open Interest on these contracts, it appears that whales have been targeting a price range from $25.0 to $40.0 for Unity Software over the last 3 months. 
<h3>Analyzing Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Assessing the volume and open interest is a strategic step in options trading. These metrics shed light on the liquidity and investor interest in Unity Software's options at specified strike prices. The forthcoming data visualizes the fluctuation in volume and open interest for both calls and puts, linked to Unity Software's substantial trades, within a strike price spectrum from $25.0 to $40.0 over the preceding 30 days.
<h3>Unity Software Call and Put Volume: 30-Day Overview</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830040_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Significant Options Trades Detected:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>U</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$92.5K</td>
<td>12.9K</td>
<td align="right">663</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>U</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$4.8</td>
<td>$4.75</td>
<td>$4.75</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$37.8K</td>
<td>2.4K</td>
<td align="right">263</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>U</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$4.0</td>
<td>$3.75</td>
<td>$3.75</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$37.5K</td>
<td>4.9K</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>U</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$3.55</td>
<td>$3.2</td>
<td>$3.55</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$36.0K</td>
<td>9.9K</td>
<td align="right">152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>U</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$7.0</td>
<td>$6.05</td>
<td>$6.9</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$32.4K</td>
<td>3.4K</td>
<td align="right">382</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Unity Software</h3>
Unity Software Inc provides a software platform for creating and operating interactive, real-time 3D content. The platform can be used to create, run, and monetize interactive, real-time 2D and 3D content for mobile phones, tablets, PCs, consoles, and augmented and virtual reality devices. The business is spread across the United States, Greater China, EMEA, APAC, and Other Americas, of which key revenue is derived from the EMEA region. The products are used in the gaming industry, architecture and construction sector, animation industry, and designing sector.
In light of the recent options history for Unity Software, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>Where Is Unity Software Standing Right Now?</h3>
<ul>
<li>Trading volume stands at 8,606,965, with U's price up by 13.48%, positioned at $25.5.</li>
<li>RSI indicators show the stock to be is currently neutral between overbought and oversold.</li>
<li>Earnings announcement expected in 53 days.</li>
</ul>
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
Trading options involves greater risks but also offers the potential for higher profits. Savvy traders mitigate these risks through ongoing education, strategic trade adjustments, utilizing various indicators, and staying attuned to market dynamics. Keep up with the latest options trades for Unity Software with <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a> for real-time alerts.

Options

Looking At Unity Software's Recent Unusual Options Activity

High-rolling investors have positioned themselves bullish on First Solar (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FSLR#NASDAQ">FSLR</a>), and it's important for retail traders to take note. 
\This activity came to our attention today through Benzinga's tracking of publicly available options data. The identities of these investors are uncertain, but such a significant move in FSLR often signals that someone has privileged information.
Today, Benzinga's options scanner spotted 16 options trades for First Solar. This is not a typical pattern.
The sentiment among these major traders is split, with 43% bullish and 37% bearish. Among all the options we identified, there was one put, amounting to $28,435, and 15 calls, totaling $1,094,121.
<h3>What's The Price Target?</h3>
Analyzing the Volume and Open Interest in these contracts, it seems that the big players have been eyeing a price window from $85.0 to $250.0 for First Solar during the past quarter. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Development</h3>
Examining the volume and open interest provides crucial insights into stock research. This information is key in gauging liquidity and interest levels for First Solar's options at certain strike prices. Below, we present a snapshot of the trends in volume and open interest for calls and puts across First Solar's significant trades, within a strike price range of $85.0 to $250.0, over the past month.
<h3>First Solar Option Volume And Open Interest Over Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830035_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Noteworthy Options Activity:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>FSLR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$7.5</td>
<td>$7.0</td>
<td>$7.5</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$375.7K</td>
<td>2.1K</td>
<td align="right">543</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FSLR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$10.7</td>
<td>$10.45</td>
<td>$10.45</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
<td>$91.9K</td>
<td>402</td>
<td align="right">77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FSLR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$9.15</td>
<td>$8.1</td>
<td>$8.1</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$71.2K</td>
<td>2.1K</td>
<td align="right">660</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FSLR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$9.1</td>
<td>$8.0</td>
<td>$8.0</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$70.4K</td>
<td>2.1K</td>
<td align="right">748</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FSLR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$2.85</td>
<td>$3.45</td>
<td>$250.00</td>
<td>$69.6K</td>
<td>1.5K</td>
<td align="right">253</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About First Solar</h3>
First Solar designs and manufactures solar photovoltaic panels, modules, and systems for use in utility-scale development projects. The company's solar modules use cadmium telluride to convert sunlight into electricity. This is commonly called thin-film technology. First Solar is the world's largest thin-film solar module manufacturer. It has production lines in Vietnam, Malaysia, the United States, and India.
In light of the recent options history for First Solar, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>Current Position of First Solar</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 183,534, the FSLR's price is up by 4.72%, now at $184.56. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently is currently neutral between overbought and oversold.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 54 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Professional Analyst Ratings for First Solar</h3>
A total of 2 professional analysts have given their take on this stock in the last 30 days, setting an average price target of $257.5.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Jefferies continues to hold a Buy rating for First Solar, targeting a price of $248. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Baird persists with their Outperform rating on First Solar, maintaining a target price of $267. 
Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest First Solar options trades with real-time alerts from <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.

FSLR

First Solar Unusual Options Activity

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>27.63</td>
<td>8.98</td>
<td>9.83</td>
<td>9.77%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>18.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>25.11</td>
<td>7.38</td>
<td>6.97</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>11.20</td>
<td>0.83</td>
<td>1.61</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>90.62</td>
<td>6.77</td>
<td>5.80</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>31.29</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td>6.45</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>350.33</td>
<td>2.16</td>
<td>3.21</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>23.60</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>2.01</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>12.92</td>
<td>0.44</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.54</td>
<td>0.65</td>
<td>1.41</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>40.55</td>
<td>1.33</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>56.81</td>
<td>2.18</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>8.23</td>
<td>0.87</td>
<td>0.98</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>59.75</td>
<td>2.64</td>
<td>2.97</td>
<td>2.99%</td>
<td>$4.21</td>
<td>$6.75</td>
<td>4.12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 27.63 is lower than the industry average by 0.46x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 8.98 which exceeds the industry average by 3.4x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.83, which is 3.31x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.77% that is 6.78% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion is 5.24x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 4.92x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 18.87%, outperforming the industry average of 4.12%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830033_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Meta Platforms in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
Meta Platforms demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.
</li>
<li>
With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. On the other hand, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest that Meta Platforms is performing exceptionally well and outpacing its industry competitors in terms of profitability and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comparative Study: Meta Platforms And Industry Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

Investors with a lot of money to spend have taken a bullish stance on UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UNH#NYSE">UNH</a>).
And retail traders should know.
We noticed this today when the trades showed up on publicly available options history that we track here at Benzinga.
Whether these are institutions or just wealthy individuals, we don't know. But when something this big happens with UNH, it often means somebody knows something is about to happen.
So how do we know what these investors just did? 
Today, <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/?utm_source=insights">Benzinga</a>'s options scanner spotted 9 uncommon options trades for UnitedHealth Group.
This isn't normal.
The overall sentiment of these big-money traders is split between 55% bullish and 22%, bearish.
Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 3 are puts, for a total amount of $102,819, and 6 are calls, for a total amount of $351,286.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $450.0 to $620.0 for UnitedHealth Group over the recent three months. 
<h3>Insights into Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Assessing the volume and open interest is a strategic step in options trading. These metrics shed light on the liquidity and investor interest in UnitedHealth Group's options at specified strike prices. The forthcoming data visualizes the fluctuation in volume and open interest for both calls and puts, linked to UnitedHealth Group's substantial trades, within a strike price spectrum from $450.0 to $620.0 over the preceding 30 days.
<h3>UnitedHealth Group Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830027_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Biggest Options Spotted:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>UNH</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$104.9</td>
<td>$100.8</td>
<td>$101.98</td>
<td>$500.00</td>
<td>$173.3K</td>
<td>75</td>
<td align="right">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UNH</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$19.0</td>
<td>$18.4</td>
<td>$18.8</td>
<td>$580.00</td>
<td>$48.8K</td>
<td>1.2K</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UNH</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$45.2</td>
<td>$43.55</td>
<td>$44.95</td>
<td>$480.00</td>
<td>$44.9K</td>
<td>404</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UNH</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/17/25</td>
<td>$44.0</td>
<td>$42.0</td>
<td>$42.0</td>
<td>$550.00</td>
<td>$42.0K</td>
<td>2.0K</td>
<td align="right">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UNH</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$29.8</td>
<td>$28.7</td>
<td>$28.79</td>
<td>$450.00</td>
<td>$34.5K</td>
<td>771</td>
<td align="right">21</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About UnitedHealth Group</h3>
UnitedHealth Group is one of the largest private health insurers, providing medical benefits to about 50 million members globally, including 1 million outside the us as June 2024. As a leader in employer-sponsored, self-directed, and government-backed insurance plans, UnitedHealth has obtained massive scale in managed care. Along with its insurance assets, UnitedHealth's continued investments in its Optum franchises have created a healthcare services colossus that spans everything from medical and pharmaceutical benefits to providing outpatient care and analytics to both affiliated and third-party customers.
Having examined the options trading patterns of UnitedHealth Group, our attention now turns directly to the company. This shift allows us to delve into its present market position and performance
<h3>Present Market Standing of UnitedHealth Group</h3>
<ul>
<li>With a volume of 257,536, the price of UNH is up 0.54% at $508.58. </li>
<li>RSI indicators hint that the underlying stock may be approaching oversold.</li>
<li>Next earnings are expected to be released in 14 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Professional Analyst Ratings for UnitedHealth Group</h3>
3 market experts have recently issued ratings for this stock, with a consensus target price of $638.3333333333334.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Oppenheimer keeps a Outperform rating on UnitedHealth Group with a target price of $640. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Piper Sandler continues to hold a Overweight rating for UnitedHealth Group, targeting a price of $600. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Stephens &amp; Co. has decided to maintain their Overweight rating on UnitedHealth Group, which currently sits at a price target of $675. 
Trading options involves greater risks but also offers the potential for higher profits. Savvy traders mitigate these risks through ongoing education, strategic trade adjustments, utilizing various indicators, and staying attuned to market dynamics. Keep up with the latest options trades for UnitedHealth Group with <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a> for real-time alerts.

Smart Money Is Betting Big In UNH Options

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) against its key competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>41.19</td>
<td>66.47</td>
<td>9.87</td>
<td>23.83%</td>
<td>$32.5</td>
<td>$43.88</td>
<td>6.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>11.06</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>$2.61</td>
<td>15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>21.38</td>
<td>26.46</td>
<td>3.79</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>65.53</td>
<td>1.77</td>
<td>1.39</td>
<td>4.28%</td>
<td>$0.86</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>48.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>157.51</td>
<td>14.21</td>
<td>7.11</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.54</td>
<td>8.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>15.17</td>
<td>3.26</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>9.39</td>
<td>0.54</td>
<td>0.57</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>55.84</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>1.03</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>23.55</td>
<td>0.98</td>
<td>0.59</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>6.47</td>
<td>2.08</td>
<td>7.36%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>22.62%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After thoroughly examining Apple, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
At 41.19, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.92x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 66.47 which exceeds the industry average by 10.27x.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 9.87, which is 4.75x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.83% is 16.47% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.5 Billion, which is 79.27x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $43.88 Billion, which indicates 53.51x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 6.07% is significantly below the industry average of 22.62%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830025_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When evaluating Apple alongside its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights arise:
<ul>
<li>
As Apple is in the middle of the list in terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, it suggests that the company has a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 1.87 compared to the other companies.
</li>
<li>
This position indicates a relatively balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a reasonable level of debt while also leveraging equity for financing its operations.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, despite slower revenue growth. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, with room for potential growth in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Assessing Apple's Performance Against Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is imperative for investors and industry observers to carefully assess companies before making investment choices. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) vis-à-vis its key competitors in the Software industry. Through a detailed analysis of important financial indicators, market standing, and growth potential, our goal is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>34.81</td>
<td>10.89</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>8.87%</td>
<td>$38.23</td>
<td>$45.49</td>
<td>16.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>40.74</td>
<td>33.91</td>
<td>8.62</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>165.13</td>
<td>23.54</td>
<td>21.04</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>22.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>47.20</td>
<td>20.20</td>
<td>15.60</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>670.90</td>
<td>27.56</td>
<td>22.87</td>
<td>-0.57%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>28.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>47.48</td>
<td>79.74</td>
<td>12.76</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>27.66</td>
<td>8.04</td>
<td>4.48</td>
<td>7.92%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>3.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>547.53</td>
<td>12.09</td>
<td>13.35</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>29.03</td>
<td>3.01</td>
<td>5.97</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>38.30</td>
<td>23.75</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>5.56%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>16.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>27.89</td>
<td>1.43</td>
<td>25.42</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>30.95</td>
<td>11.41</td>
<td>8.88</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>36.65</td>
<td>23.85</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>35.03</td>
<td>6.57</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>6.88%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>64.77</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>129.23</td>
<td>19.78</td>
<td>11.1</td>
<td>13.66%</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>$1.28</td>
<td>11.24%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After a detailed analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
At 34.81, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.27x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 10.89, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.55x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 12.39, which is 1.12x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.87%, which is 4.79% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.23 Billion is 63.72x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $45.49 Billion, which indicates 35.54x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 16.04%, outperforming the industry average of 11.24%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830017_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Microsoft can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest that the stock is undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high PS ratio indicates that the stock may be overvalued based on revenue. In terms of ROE, Microsoft's performance is lower than its peers, while its high EBITDA and gross profit margins indicate strong operational efficiency. Additionally, the high revenue growth rate suggests potential for future expansion and market dominance.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Comparing Microsoft With Industry Competitors In Software Industry

Over the past 24 hours, Cardano's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ada/usd">ADA</a>) price has risen 11.72% to $0.96. This continues its positive trend over the past week where it has experienced a 11.0% gain, moving from $0.87 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $3.09. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Cardano over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830009_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
Cardano's trading volume has climbed 109.0% over the past week, moving in tandem, directionally, with the overall circulating supply of the coin, which has increased 0.1%. This brings the circulating supply to 35.85 billion, which makes up an estimated 79.66% of its max supply of 45.00 billion. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for ADA is #9 at $34.57 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830009_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$ADA

Cardano Rises More Than 11% In 24 hours

Veeva Systems (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VEEV#NYSE">VEEV</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 11.57% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 22.81%. Currently, Veeva Systems has a market capitalization of $34.44 billion. 
Buying $1000 In VEEV: If an investor had bought $1000 of VEEV stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $7,821.72 today based on a price of $212.12 for VEEV at the time of writing.
<h3>Veeva Systems's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830010_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

VEEV

$1000 Invested In Veeva Systems 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

GlobalFoundries Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GFS#NASDAQ">GFS</a>) and International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBM#NYSE">IBM</a>) have announced a settlement resolving all ongoing lawsuits between the two companies, including claims related to breach of contract, trade secrets, and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/01/g42762479/globalfoundries-and-ibm-announce-settlement-and-resolution-of-all-litigation-matters" rel="noreferrer noopener">intellectual property.</a>
The settlement, which ends a long-standing legal dispute, allows both companies to explore future collaboration in areas of mutual interest.
The specific terms of the settlement remain confidential, but both parties have expressed satisfaction with the outcome.
In April 2023, GlobalFoundries <a target="_blank" href="https://investors.gf.com/news-releases/news-release-details/globalfoundries-files-lawsuit-against-ibm-protect-its" rel="noreferrer noopener">sued</a> IBM for misappropriation of trade secrets.
GlobalFoundries accused IBM of unlawfully disclosing confidential intellectual property and trade secrets after IBM sold its microelectronics business to GlobalFoundries in 2015.
Also Read:<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/42761107/us-stocks-to-open-higher-in-the-first-trading-session-of-2025-analyst-says-history-favors-rebound-after-year-end-dip" rel="noreferrer noopener"> US Stocks To Open Higher In The First Trading Session Of 2025: Analyst Says History Favors Rebound After Year-End Dip</a>
The technology in question had been collaboratively developed by the companies in Albany, New York, with GlobalFoundries receiving the exclusive right to license and disclose the technology following the sale.
GlobalFoundries alleged that IBM shared this technology with its partners, including Intel and Japan's Rapidus, a newly formed advanced logic foundry.
These disclosures allegedly resulted in IBM receiving millions of dollars in licensing income and other benefits, which GlobalFoundries claimed were unjustly obtained.
IBM's executives previously described the Intel and Rapidus partnerships as based on technology developed at the Albany NanoTech Complex, technology that GlobalFoundries asserted IBM had no right to disclose.
Both companies have now moved past the dispute.
Arvind Krishna, CEO of IBM, stated that resolving the disputes is a significant step forward, allowing both companies to focus on future innovations.
Thomas Caulfield, CEO of GlobalFoundries, also welcomed the resolution, expressing eagerness to strengthen the semiconductor industry through renewed collaboration.
Price Action: GFS shares are trading higher by 2.61% to $44.03 at last check Thursday, while IBM shares are trading higher by 0.49% to $220.90.
Image via Shutterstock.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/01/42754939/sp-500-scaled-a-record-57-all-time-highs-in-2024-heres-what-analysts-think-is-in-store-in-2025" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">S&amp;P 500 Scaled A Record 57 All-Time Highs In 2024: Here's What Analysts Think Is In Store This Year</a></li>
</ul>

Equities

Legal

Tech

General

GlobalFoundries And IBM Settle All Litigation Matters, Ending Trade Secrets Battle

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>53.02</td>
<td>49.91</td>
<td>29.48</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>179.72</td>
<td>16.06</td>
<td>21.48</td>
<td>6.49%</td>
<td>$7.29</td>
<td>$9.0</td>
<td>51.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.05</td>
<td>8.44</td>
<td>12.70</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
<td>$555.05</td>
<td>$439.35</td>
<td>38.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>106.89</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>8.13</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>34.85</td>
<td>9.91</td>
<td>10.96</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-8.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>17.18</td>
<td>6.50</td>
<td>4.46</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>203.94</td>
<td>21.57</td>
<td>37.08</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>64.77</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>11.24</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>-10.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>24.11</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>39.83</td>
<td>4.91</td>
<td>5.68</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>66.71</td>
<td>12.27</td>
<td>14.20</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>15.65</td>
<td>3.13</td>
<td>3.72</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>10.28</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>-26.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>20.29</td>
<td>2.32</td>
<td>1.22</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>2.48</td>
<td>4.92</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.39</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>2.33</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>24.03</td>
<td>2.24</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>124.91</td>
<td>8.53</td>
<td>13.10</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>55.54</td>
<td>11.11</td>
<td>13.95</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.36</td>
<td>4.37</td>
<td>10.82</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>56.61</td>
<td>6.58</td>
<td>9.7</td>
<td>4.08%</td>
<td>$33.46</td>
<td>$27.2</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon analyzing NVIDIA, the following trends can be observed: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 53.02 is lower than the industry average by 0.94x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 49.91 relative to the industry average by 7.59x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 29.48, which is 3.04x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% that is 27.05% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.68x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.96x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 93.61%, outperforming the industry average of 8.01%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735830007_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing NVIDIA with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
Compared to its top 4 peers, NVIDIA has a stronger financial position indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive attribute by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests that NVIDIA may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the market values the company's assets and sales more highly. On the other hand, the high ROE, revenue growth, and low EBITDA and gross profit ratios suggest that NVIDIA is generating strong returns on equity and experiencing significant revenue growth, despite lower profitability margins.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Investigating NVIDIA's Standing In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry Compared To Competitors

Making a noteworthy insider sell on January 2, Mark Wallace, SVP at Keysight Techs (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KEYS#NYSE">KEYS</a>), is reported in the latest SEC filing.
What Happened: A Form 4 filing from the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001601046/000160104625000002//Archives/edgar/data/1601046/000160104625000002/0001601046-25-000002-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday showed that Wallace sold 6,000 shares of Keysight Techs. The total transaction amounted to $970,769. 
Monitoring the market, Keysight Techs's shares down by 0.08% at $160.5 during Thursday's morning.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Keysight Techs</h3>
Keysight Technologies is a leader in the field of testing and measurement, helping electronics OEMs and suppliers alike bring products to market to fit industry standards and specifications. Keysight specializes in the communications market, but also supplies into the government, automotive, industrial, and semiconductor manufacturing markets. Keysight's solutions include testing tools, analytical software, and services. The firm's stated objective is to reduce time to market and improve efficiency at its more than 30,000 customers.
<h3>Breaking Down Keysight Techs's Financial Performance</h3>
Revenue Growth: Keysight Techs's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 31 October, 2024, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -1.83%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Key Insights into Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company maintains a high gross margin of 62.32%, indicating strong cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Keysight Techs's EPS is below the industry average. The company faced challenges with a current EPS of -0.42. This suggests a potential decline in earnings.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Keysight Techs's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.4.
Insights into Valuation Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Keysight Techs's current Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio of 45.76 is higher than the industry average, indicating that the stock may be overvalued according to market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: A higher-than-average P/S ratio of 5.65 suggests overvaluation in the eyes of investors, considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Keysight Techs's EV/EBITDA ratio stands at 23.01, surpassing industry benchmarks. This places the company in a position with a higher-than-average market valuation.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization surpasses industry averages, showcasing a dominant size relative to peers and suggesting a strong market position.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Impact of Insider Transactions on Investments</h3>
It's important to note that insider transactions alone should not dictate investment decisions, but they can provide valuable insights.
Considering the legal perspective, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, according to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are mandated to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Pointing towards optimism, a company insider's new purchase signals their positive anticipation for the stock to rise.
Nevertheless, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be influenced by various factors.
<h3>The Insider's Guide to Important Transaction Codes</h3>
When it comes to transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> tend to focus on those in the open market, detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S indicates a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001601046">Check Out The Full List Of Keysight Techs's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

KEYS

Mark Wallace Implements A Sell Strategy: Offloads $970K In Keysight Techs Stock

Argus Research analyst Bill Selesky maintains AutoZone (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AZO#NYSE">AZO</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $3560 to $3678.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Argus Research Maintains Buy on AutoZone, Raises Price Target to $3678

WIIM

Kosmos Energy shares are trading higher after the company announced the start of its West Africa GTA LNG gas production project

Top Wall Street analysts changed their outlook on these top names. For a complete view of all analyst rating changes, including upgrades and downgrades, please see our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings">analyst ratings page</a>.
<ul>
<li>JMP Securities raised the price target for Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) from $660 to $750. JMP Securities analyst Matthew Condon maintained a Market Outperform rating. Meta shares closed at $585.51 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/META/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
<li>JP Morgan cut Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SLB#NYSE">SLB</a>) price target from $55 to $48. JP Morgan analyst Arun Jayaram maintained an Overweight rating. SLB shares closed at $38.34 on Tuesday. See how other analysts view this stock.</li>
<li>Deutsche Bank cut the price target for Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LMT#NYSE">LMT</a>) from $611 to $523. Deutsche Bank analyst Scott Deuschle downgraded the stock from Buy to Hold. Lockheed Martin shares closed at $485.94 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LMT/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
<li>Wells Fargo raised the price target for CyberArk Software Ltd. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CYBR#NASDAQ">CYBR</a>) from $350 to $410. Wells Fargo analyst Andrew Nowinski maintained an Overweight rating. CyberArk Software shares closed at $333.15 on Tuesday. See how other analysts view this stock.</li>
<li>Keybanc cut FMC Corporation (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FMC#NYSE">FMC</a>) price target from $79 to $69. Keybanc analyst Aleksey Yefremov maintained an Overweight rating. FMC shares settled at $48.61 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FMC/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock</a>.</li>
<li>Northland Capital Markets increased Astera Labs, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALAB#NASDAQ">ALAB</a>) price target from $100 to $120. Northland Capital Markets analyst Gus Richard downgraded the stock from Outperform to Market Perform. Astera Labs shares closed at $132.45 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ALAB/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock.</a></li>
<li>Deutsche Bank cut Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LMT#NYSE">LMT</a>) price target from $611 to $523. Deutsche Bank analyst Scott Deuschle downgraded the stock from Buy to Hold. Lockheed Martin shares closed at $485.94 on Tuesday.  <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LMT/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock</a>.</li>
<li>JP Morgan slashed the price target for Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SLB#NYSE">SLB</a>) from $55 to $48. JP Morgan analyst Arun Jayaram maintained an Overweight rating. SLB shares settled at $38.34 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/SLB/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock</a>.</li>
<li>Oppenheimer cut Universal Display Corporation (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OLED#NASDAQ">OLED</a>) price target from $220 to $200. Oppenheimer analyst Martin Yang maintained an Outperform rating. Universal Display shares closed at $146.20 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/OLED/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock</a>.</li>
<li>Deutsche Bank increased The Boeing Company (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BA#NYSE">BA</a>) price target from $184 to $215. Deutsche Bank analyst Scott Deuschle maintained a Buy rating. Boeing shares closed at $177.00 on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BA/analyst-ratings">See how other analysts view this stock</a>.</li>
</ul>
Read This Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/42763645/how-to-earn-500-a-month-from-acuity-brands-stock-ahead-of-q1-earnings">How To Earn $500 A Month From Acuity Brands Stock Ahead Of Q1 Earnings</a></li>
</ul>

ALAB

CYBR

OLED

Meta To Rally Around 28%? Here Are 10 Top Analyst Forecasts For Thursday

SYNA

Synaptics shares are trading higher after the company announced a collaboration with Google to boost AI innovation for wearables and smart devices.

Ladenburg Thalmann analyst Glenn Mattson maintains LightPath Technologies (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LPTH#NASDAQ">LPTH</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $3 to $5.

LPTH

Ladenburg Thalmann Maintains Buy on LightPath Technologies, Raises Price Target to $5

SOFI

SoFi Technologies shares are trading lower after Keefe, Bruyette & Woods downgraded the stock from Market Perform to Underperform.

Macro Economic Events

Econ #s

Economics

S&P Global US Manufacturing PMI For December 49.4 Vs 48.3 Est.; 49.7 Prior

Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bullish stance on NVIDIA.
Looking at options history for NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) we detected 55 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 49% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 41% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 13 are puts, for a total amount of $661,125 and 42, calls, for a total amount of $2,616,362.
<h3>What's The Price Target?</h3>
After evaluating the trading volumes and Open Interest, it's evident that the major market movers are focusing on a price band between $113.0 and $160.0 for NVIDIA, spanning the last three months.
<h3>Insights into Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Examining the volume and open interest provides crucial insights into stock research. This information is key in gauging liquidity and interest levels for NVIDIA's options at certain strike prices. Below, we present a snapshot of the trends in volume and open interest for calls and puts across NVIDIA's significant trades, within a strike price range of $113.0 to $160.0, over the past month.
<h3>NVIDIA Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1735829162_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Biggest Options Spotted:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/31/25</td>
<td>$11.85</td>
<td>$11.8</td>
<td>$11.85</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>$829.5K</td>
<td>4.9K</td>
<td>1.4K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/03/25</td>
<td>$2.92</td>
<td>$2.88</td>
<td>$2.91</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$254.8K</td>
<td>25.8K</td>
<td>5.3K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/24/25</td>
<td>$5.0</td>
<td>$4.9</td>
<td>$4.93</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$123.2K</td>
<td>82.0K</td>
<td>523</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/03/25</td>
<td>$0.98</td>
<td>$0.97</td>
<td>$0.97</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$97.0K</td>
<td>19.5K</td>
<td>1.7K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/17/25</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>$0.47</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
<td>$95.5K</td>
<td>71.7K</td>
<td>2.0K</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About NVIDIA</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
Following our analysis of the options activities associated with NVIDIA, we pivot to a closer look at the company's own performance.
<h3>Present Market Standing of NVIDIA</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 8,704,875, the NVDA's price is up by 1.35%, now at $136.1. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently is currently neutral between overbought and oversold.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 55 days.</li>
</ul>
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
Trading options involves greater risks but also offers the potential for higher profits. Savvy traders mitigate these risks through ongoing education, strategic trade adjustments, utilizing various indicators, and staying attuned to market dynamics. Keep up with the latest options trades for NVIDIA with <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a> for real-time alerts.

What the Options Market Tells Us About NVIDIA

PID: An International Dividend Growth ETF With Little To Show