Latest news for  (OTC:JPGLF) Stock

Wells Fargo analyst Neil Kalton maintains WEC Energy Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WEC#NYSE">WEC</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $112 to $115.

News

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Wells Fargo Maintains Overweight on WEC Energy Group, Raises Price Target to $115

RBC Capital analyst Michael Siperco upgrades SSR Mining (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SSRM#NASDAQ">SSRM</a>) from Underperform to Sector Perform and raises the price target from $5.5 to $8.

Upgrades

SSRM

RBC Capital Upgrades SSR Mining to Sector Perform, Raises Price Target to $8

WIIM

Mueller Water Products shares are trading higher following better-than-expected Q1 reported financial results. Additionally, the company raised its FY25 adjusted EBITDA guidance and issued FY25 revenue guidance above estimates.

Trading Ideas

RNAZ

TransCode Therapeutics Shares Resumed Trade

ATS shares are trading higher. The company reported Q3 financial results,

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>51.72</td>
<td>9.82</td>
<td>4.17</td>
<td>6.19%</td>
<td>$32.08</td>
<td>$31.0</td>
<td>11.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>20.93</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>1.90</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
<td>$54.02</td>
<td>$92.47</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>11.16</td>
<td>4.09</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>69.76</td>
<td>24.91</td>
<td>5.45</td>
<td>10.37%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>35.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>13.15</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>0.41</td>
<td>5.22%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>41.68</td>
<td>10.18</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>1.74%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>16.86</td>
<td>5.92</td>
<td>3.33</td>
<td>11.59%</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.03</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>0.53</td>
<td>2.76%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>-9.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>23.94</td>
<td>5.65</td>
<td>3.91</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>12.06</td>
<td>3.79</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>6.37%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>-3.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>31.39</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2.89</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>24.72</td>
<td>1.01</td>
<td>0.18</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>15.35</td>
<td>4.06</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>23.91</td>
<td>4.06</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>5.09%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>5.95</td>
<td>0.39</td>
<td>0.09</td>
<td>0.58%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>-8.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groupon Inc</td>
<td>16.41</td>
<td>11.26</td>
<td>0.84</td>
<td>34.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-9.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>46.40</td>
<td>12.19</td>
<td>0.57</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>23.79</td>
<td>6.04</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>7.13%</td>
<td>$6.54</td>
<td>$13.55</td>
<td>7.83%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By carefully studying Amazon.com, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
Notably, the current Price to Earnings ratio for this stock, 51.72, is 2.17x above the industry norm, reflecting a higher valuation relative to the industry.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 9.82 which exceeds the industry average by 1.63x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 4.17, which is 2.42x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.19%, which is 0.94% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.08 Billion, which is 4.91x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $31.0 Billion, which indicates 2.29x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 11.04%, which surpasses the industry average of 7.83%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738767661_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio provides insights into the proportion of debt a company has in relation to its equity and asset value.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Amazon.com in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
Amazon.com is in a relatively stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. The low ROE suggests that Amazon.com is not generating significant returns on shareholder equity. However, the high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth show that the company is performing well in terms of operational efficiency and revenue generation compared to its industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

AMZN

Investigating Amazon.com's Standing In Broadline Retail Industry Compared To Competitors

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>29.51</td>
<td>9.77</td>
<td>11.19</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>$28.26</td>
<td>$39.55</td>
<td>20.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>25.67</td>
<td>7.75</td>
<td>7.34</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>12.16</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>1.75</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>104.34</td>
<td>7.80</td>
<td>6.68</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>34.09</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>7.03</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>347.83</td>
<td>2.15</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>24.49</td>
<td>3.58</td>
<td>2.08</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.96</td>
<td>0.69</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>67.04</td>
<td>2.57</td>
<td>1.43</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>13.89</td>
<td>0.47</td>
<td>1.27</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>39.34</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>67.58</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.4</td>
<td>2.89%</td>
<td>$4.58</td>
<td>$7.32</td>
<td>5.74%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When closely examining Meta Platforms, the following trends emerge: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 29.51 is 0.44x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 9.77 relative to the industry average by 3.21x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.19, surpassing the industry average by 3.29x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.0%, which is 9.11% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $28.26 Billion, which is 6.17x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $39.55 Billion, which indicates 5.4x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 20.63%, outperforming the industry average of 5.74%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738767650_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Meta Platforms with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
Meta Platforms has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The PE, PB, and PS ratios for Meta Platforms indicate that it may be overvalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. However, its high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest that the company is performing well and has strong financial health relative to its competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Performance Comparison: Meta Platforms And Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

On February 5, Matt Brandwein, EVP &amp; Chief Accounting Officer at Postal Realty Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PSTL#NYSE">PSTL</a>) executed a significant insider buy, as disclosed in the latest SEC filing.
What Happened: Brandwein's recent move, as outlined in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001759774/000162828025003889//Archives/edgar/data/1759774/000162828025003889/0001628280-25-003889-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday, involves purchasing 7,675 shares of Postal Realty Trust. The total transaction value is $99,992.
At Wednesday morning, Postal Realty Trust shares are down by 0.0%, trading at $13.38.
<h3>Discovering Postal Realty Trust: A Closer Look</h3>
Postal Realty Trust Inc is an internally managed real estate corporation that owns and manages properties leased to the United States Postal Service, or the USPS. Its objective is to create stockholder value by generating risk-adjusted returns through expanding its portfolio of owned and managed postal properties leased to the USPS. The majority of the revenue is generated from the rental income received.
<h3>Postal Realty Trust's Financial Performance</h3>
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Postal Realty Trust's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 22.11% as of 30 September, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Real Estate sector, the company excelled with a growth rate higher than the average among peers.
Interpreting Earnings Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: With a high gross margin of 74.46%, the company demonstrates effective cost control and strong profitability relative to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Postal Realty Trust's EPS lags behind the industry average, indicating concerns and potential challenges with a current EPS of 0.03.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Postal Realty Trust's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 1.13.
Market Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Postal Realty Trust's stock is currently priced at a premium level, as reflected in the higher-than-average P/E ratio of 167.25.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 4.11 is below industry norms, suggesting potential undervaluation and presenting an investment opportunity for those considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Postal Realty Trust's EV/EBITDA ratio stands at 15.85, surpassing industry benchmarks. This places the company in a position with a higher-than-average market valuation.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Why Insider Transactions Are Key in Investment Decisions</h3>
Emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach, considering insider transactions is valuable, but it's crucial to evaluate them in conjunction with other investment factors.
In the realm of legality, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are required to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Notably, when a company insider makes a new purchase, it is considered an indicator of their positive expectations for the stock.
Conversely, insider sells may not necessarily signal a bearish stance on the stock and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>Navigating the World of Insider Transaction Codes</h3>
In the domain of transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> frequently turn their focus to those taking place in the open market, as meticulously outlined in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 indicates a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001759774">Check Out The Full List Of Postal Realty Trust's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

PSTL

Bullish Move: Matt Brandwein Shows Confidence, Acquires $99K In Postal Realty Trust Stock

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>36.95</td>
<td>52.39</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>58.74%</td>
<td>$45.91</td>
<td>$58.27</td>
<td>3.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>10.79</td>
<td>1.10</td>
<td>0.92</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>$2.61</td>
<td>15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>22.36</td>
<td>27.67</td>
<td>3.97</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>175.26</td>
<td>15.81</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>8.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>18.44</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>1.40</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>41.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>14.51</td>
<td>3.12</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>10.99</td>
<td>0.63</td>
<td>0.67</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>55.74</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>1.03</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>21.88</td>
<td>0.91</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>41.25</td>
<td>6.81</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>7.43%</td>
<td>$0.42</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>21.69%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting a comprehensive analysis of Apple, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 36.95, which is 0.9x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 52.39 relative to the industry average by 7.69x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 9.0, which is 4.09x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 58.74% that is 51.31% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $45.91 Billion, which is 109.31x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $58.27 Billion is 71.06x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 3.95% compared to the industry average of 21.69%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738767640_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Apple can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When compared to its top 4 peers, Apple has a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 1.45.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company maintains a balanced financial structure with a reasonable level of debt and an appropriate reliance on equity financing.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, but may be facing challenges in revenue expansion. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, but there may be room for improvement in revenue growth to align with industry trends.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Inquiry Into Apple's Competitor Dynamics In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

Making a noteworthy insider sell on February 5, Christopher Harborne, 10% Owner at Innovative Solns (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ISSC#NASDAQ">ISSC</a>), is reported in the latest SEC filing.
What Happened: Harborne's decision to sell 63,368 shares of Innovative Solns was revealed in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000836690/000194647925000007//Archives/edgar/data/836690/000194647925000007/0001946479-25-000007-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday. The total value of the sale is $710,494.
The latest market snapshot at Wednesday morning reveals Innovative Solns shares down by 2.02%, trading at $11.14.
<h3>Unveiling the Story Behind Innovative Solns</h3>
Innovative Solutions and Support Inc is a systems integrator that designs, manufactures, sells, and services air data equipment, engine display systems, standby equipment, primary flight guidance, and cockpit display systems for retrofit applications and original equipment manufacturers. The company supplies integrated Flight Management Systems, Flat Panel Display Systems, Integrated Standby Units, Positioning System receivers that enable reduced carbon footprint navigation, and an Autothrottle, which allows a pilot to automatically control the power setting of the engine and is designed to reduce pilot workload and enhance safety. It sells its products to both the OEM and the retrofit markets.
<h3>Innovative Solns's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Revenue Growth: Innovative Solns's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 18.41%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Industrials sector.
Analyzing Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company maintains a high gross margin of 55.43%, indicating strong cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Innovative Solns's EPS is below the industry average, signaling challenges in bottom-line performance with a current EPS of 0.18.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Innovative Solns's debt-to-equity ratio surpasses industry norms, standing at 0.6. This suggests the company carries a substantial amount of debt, posing potential financial challenges.
Navigating Market Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Innovative Solns's P/E ratio of 28.43 is below the industry average, suggesting the stock may be undervalued.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: A higher-than-average P/S ratio of 4.21 suggests overvaluation in the eyes of investors, considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): With a lower-than-industry-average EV/EBITDA ratio of 19.09, Innovative Solns presents a potential value opportunity, as investors are paying less for each unit of EBITDA.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Relevance of Insider Transactions</h3>
Emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach, considering insider transactions is valuable, but it's crucial to evaluate them in conjunction with other investment factors.
In the realm of legality, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are required to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Notably, when a company insider makes a new purchase, it is considered an indicator of their positive expectations for the stock.
Conversely, insider sells may not necessarily signal a bearish stance on the stock and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>Essential Transaction Codes Unveiled</h3>
When dissecting transactions, the focal point for <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> is often those occurring in the open market, meticulously detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C indicates the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0000836690">Check Out The Full List Of Innovative Solns's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

ISSC

Christopher Harborne Executes Sell Order: Offloads $710K In Innovative Solns Stock

Macro Economic Events

Econ #s

Economics

ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI For January 52.8 vs 54.2Est ; 54 Prior

Hilary Spann, Executive Vice President at BXP (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BXP#NYSE">BXP</a>), disclosed an insider sell on February 5, according to a recent SEC filing.
What Happened: A Form 4 filing from the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001037540/000124699125000066//Archives/edgar/data/1037540/000124699125000066/0001246991-25-000066-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday showed that Spann sold 12,379 shares of BXP. The total transaction amounted to $891,535. 
BXP's shares are actively trading at $70.0, experiencing a down of 3.14% during Wednesday's morning session.
<h3>Discovering BXP: A Closer Look</h3>
BXP Inc. owns over 180 properties consisting of approximately 53 million rentable square feet of space. The portfolio is dominated by office buildings and is spread across major cities such as New York, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, and the Washington, D.C., region. The real estate investment trust also owns limited retail, hotel, and residential properties.
<h3>BXP's Financial Performance</h3>
Revenue Growth: BXP's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 4.24%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Real Estate sector.
Key Profitability Indicators:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company issues a cost efficiency warning with a low gross margin of 60.69%, indicating potential difficulties in maintaining profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): BXP's EPS is a standout, portraying a positive bottom-line trend that exceeds the industry average with a current EPS of 0.53.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: BXP's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 2.95, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
Valuation Analysis:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The P/E ratio of 31.42 is lower than the industry average, implying a discounted valuation for BXP's stock.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The Price to Sales ratio is 3.37, which is lower than the industry average. This suggests a possible undervaluation based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): With an EV/EBITDA ratio lower than industry benchmarks at 13.64, BXP presents an attractive value opportunity.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Relevance of Insider Transactions</h3>
Insider transactions, although significant, should be considered within the larger context of market analysis and trends.
In legal terms, an "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of a company's equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This can include executives in the c-suite and large hedge funds. These insiders are required to let the public know of their transactions via a Form 4 filing, which must be filed within two business days of the transaction.
When a company insider makes a new purchase, that is an indication that they expect the stock to rise.
Insider sells, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean that the seller thinks the stock will go down. 
<h3>Transaction Codes To Focus On</h3>
Delving into transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> typically prioritize those unfolding in the open market, as precisely outlined in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 indicates a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001037540">Check Out The Full List Of BXP's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Hilary Spann Takes Money Off The Table, Sells $891K In BXP Stock

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) against its key competitors in the Software industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>33.23</td>
<td>10.13</td>
<td>11.77</td>
<td>8.17%</td>
<td>$36.79</td>
<td>$47.83</td>
<td>12.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>41.05</td>
<td>34.16</td>
<td>8.69</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>147.68</td>
<td>21.71</td>
<td>19.17</td>
<td>4.06%</td>
<td>$0.62</td>
<td>$2.33</td>
<td>21.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>47.57</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>15.72</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>799.06</td>
<td>32.83</td>
<td>27.24</td>
<td>-0.57%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>28.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>51.65</td>
<td>86.75</td>
<td>13.88</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>26.51</td>
<td>7.75</td>
<td>4.35</td>
<td>7.48%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>4.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>591.12</td>
<td>13.05</td>
<td>14.41</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>31.24</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>6.24</td>
<td>2.72%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>13.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>44.02</td>
<td>25.57</td>
<td>8.01</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>21.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>24.89</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>22.68</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>31.66</td>
<td>11.67</td>
<td>9.08</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>37.55</td>
<td>24.44</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>68.14</td>
<td>1.87</td>
<td>3.27</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>37.23</td>
<td>5.67</td>
<td>3.38</td>
<td>0.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>21.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>141.38</td>
<td>20.74</td>
<td>11.28</td>
<td>13.01%</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>$1.3</td>
<td>13.58%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After examining Microsoft, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 33.23 significantly below the industry average by 0.24x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 10.13, which is well below the industry average by 0.49x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.77, which is 1.04x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.17% that is 4.84% below the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.79 Billion, which is 62.36x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $47.83 Billion, which indicates 36.79x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 12.27% compared to the industry average of 13.58%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738767630_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Microsoft can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector, as indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive aspect for investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest that the stock is undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high PS ratio indicates that the stock may be overvalued based on revenue. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit, Microsoft shows strong performance compared to its peers, indicating efficient operations and profitability. The low revenue growth suggests that Microsoft may be facing challenges in expanding its top line compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry

ISM Non-Manufacturing Prices For Jan 60.4 Vs 64.4 Prior

Wells Fargo initiates coverage on CoStar Gr (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CSGP#NASDAQ">CSGP</a>) with a Underweight rating and announces Price Target of $65.

Initiation

CSGP

Wells Fargo Initiates Coverage On CoStar Gr with Underweight Rating, Announces Price Target of $65

When Elon Musk speaks, people listen – especially when the topic turns to other billionaires. Back in 2020, during a New York Times interview with Maureen Dowd, Musk was put on the spot in a game of "Confirm or Deny." The statement? "<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/25/01/43341020/warren-buffett-would-give-up-a-year-of-his-life-to-eat-whatever-he-wants-his-daughter-confirms-he-still-gets-daily-mcdonalds-breakfast-at-94">Warren Buffett</a> is overrated."
Musk's response wasn't a direct confirmation or denial. Instead, he chuckled and said, "Hahaha. Um, I think he has managed to create a great image for himself as a kindly grandfather, which is maybe overstating the case."
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/01/43306967/elon-musk-slams-work-from-home-as-messed-up-and-morally-wrong-meanwhile-remote-workers-quietly-sneak-in-three-day-weekends-every-week">That's classic Musk</a>: candid, off-the-cuff and impossible to ignore.
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mark-cubans-advice-for-lotto-winners">Many are surprised by Mark Cuban's advice for lotto winners: Cash or annuity?</a></li>
<li>Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/elf-labs-nancy-pelosi">Here's How You Can Invest In Multiple Pre-IPO AI Startups With Just $1,000</a></li>
</ul>
A Not-So-Warm History
While Musk didn't outright call Buffett overrated, it's clear the two aren't exactly kindred spirits. Their differences go beyond business philosophies – they've made their feelings about each other known, albeit with a mix of sharp remarks and occasional respect.
On The Joe Rogan Experience in 2020, as reported by CNBC, Musk didn't hold back, saying, "To be totally frank, I'm not his biggest fan." He added, "He does a lot of capital allocation. He reads a lot of sort of annual reports of companies and all the accounting, and it's pretty boring really."
Musk's skepticism toward Buffett's strategies isn't new. In a 2018 Tesla earnings call, he dismissed Buffett's famous concept of economic moats – companies' competitive advantages that protect them from rivals. "First of all, I think moats are lame," Musk said. "They're like nice in a sort of quaint, vestigial way. But if your only defense against invading armies is a moat, you will not last long. What matters is the pace of innovation. That is the fundamental determinant of competitiveness."
Trending: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/are-you-rich">Are you rich?</a> Here&#8217;s what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.
Buffett, the cool-headed investor, responded with trademark wit during the 2018 Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting: "Certainly you should be working on improving your own moat and defending your own moat all the time. And Elon may turn things upside down in some areas. I don't think he'd want to take us on in candy."
Respect Beneath the Rivalry?
Despite these jabs, there's no real evidence of bad blood. In fact, Buffett has acknowledged Musk's genius. At Berkshire Hathaway's 2023 shareholder meeting, Buffett called Musk a "brilliant, brilliant guy" and praised his "dedication to solving the impossible." <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/11/41810582/charlie-munger-warned-its-a-b-tch-but-you-gotta-do-it-your-100-000-is-the-hardest-but-the-most-i">Charlie Munger</a>, Buffett's longtime business partner, echoed the sentiment, saying Musk "would not have achieved what he has in life if he hadn't tried for unreasonably extreme objectives."
Musk responded graciously, posting on X, "Appreciate the kind words from Warren and Charlie."
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter"> 
<div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">Appreciate the kind words from Warren &amp; Charlie
&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1654966903327055872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 6, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
</figure>
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/elon-musk-told-the-u-n-if-they-could-show-a-plan-for-ending-world-hunger-hed-donate-6-billion-i-will-sell-tesla-stock-right-now-and-do-it">Elon Musk Told The U.N. If They Could Show A Plan For Ending World Hunger He'd Donate $6 Billion – ‘I Will Sell Tesla Stock Right Now And Do It'</a>
Different Roads to he Top
At the core of their dynamic are fundamentally different worldviews:
• Risk Tolerance: Buffett is famously risk-averse while Musk thrives on high-stakes bets – think SpaceX rockets and Tesla's electric revolution.
• Innovation vs. Stability: Musk is all about disruption. Buffett prefers stable, time-tested businesses.
• Investment Philosophy: Buffett looks for "economic castles protected by unbreachable moats" while Musk bets on constant innovation as the key to survival.
Still, they share common ground. Both value long-term thinking and understand the power of focusing on what you do best.
So, is Warren Buffett overrated? Musk didn't say yes – but he didn't say no, either. What's clear is that even among billionaires, respect doesn't always mean agreement. And maybe that's the point.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li>Inspired by Uber and Airbnb &#8211; Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets &#8211; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.26/share!</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/gbr-savings-by-age">If You're Age 35, 50, or 60: Here&#8217;s How Much You Should Have Saved Vs. Invested By Now</a></li>
</ul>

Personal Finance

Elon Musk Said Warren Buffett 'Managed To Create A Great Image As A Kindly Grandfather' – But Thinks That's 'Maybe Overstating The Case'

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.84</td>
<td>44.09</td>
<td>26.04</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>29.78</td>
<td>8.15</td>
<td>12.07</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$596.09</td>
<td>$512.38</td>
<td>38.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>172.43</td>
<td>15.41</td>
<td>20.61</td>
<td>6.49%</td>
<td>$7.29</td>
<td>$9.0</td>
<td>51.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>105.75</td>
<td>3.40</td>
<td>8.04</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>19.36</td>
<td>7.28</td>
<td>5.02</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>268.15</td>
<td>28.36</td>
<td>48.75</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>34.72</td>
<td>9.74</td>
<td>10.61</td>
<td>7.05%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-3.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>62.81</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>10.90</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>-10.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>25.98</td>
<td>2.16</td>
<td>3.50</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>73.99</td>
<td>13.61</td>
<td>15.75</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>36.53</td>
<td>4.50</td>
<td>5.21</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>12.55</td>
<td>2.51</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>19.99</td>
<td>2.29</td>
<td>1.20</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>13.48</td>
<td>1.15</td>
<td>1.58</td>
<td>1.95%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>2.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>14.32</td>
<td>2.34</td>
<td>4.64</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>1.36</td>
<td>2.17</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>23.41</td>
<td>2.19</td>
<td>3.34</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>127.50</td>
<td>8.75</td>
<td>13.37</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>292.46</td>
<td>2.26</td>
<td>2.07</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-14.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>53.68</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>13.48</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.25</td>
<td>4.36</td>
<td>10.78</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>71.29</td>
<td>6.67</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$33.84</td>
<td>$29.51</td>
<td>8.56%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through an analysis of NVIDIA, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 46.84 significantly below the industry average by 0.66x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 44.09 relative to the industry average by 6.61x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 26.04, surpassing the industry average by 2.66x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% is 27.2% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.68x below the industry average. This potentially indicates lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.89x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 93.61%, outperforming the industry average of 8.56%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738767618_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When evaluating NVIDIA alongside its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights arise:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests NVIDIA is undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the market values the company's assets and sales more highly. On the other hand, the high ROE, revenue growth, and low EBITDA and gross profit ratios suggest that NVIDIA is performing well in terms of profitability and growth compared to its industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Understanding NVIDIA's Position In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry Compared To Competitors

ISM Non-Manufacturing Employment For Jan 52.3 vs 51.3 Prior

Janus Henderson Group PLC (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JHG#NYSE">JHG</a>) is a turnaround story in <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/asset-management">traditional asset management</a>.
The firm&#8217;s management is taking several steps to leverage its &#8220;strong balance sheet to acquire new capabilities and distribution," according to JPMorgan.
The Janus Henderson Group Analyst: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings/analyst/5df3760ebffdfc0001d7368c/kenneth-worthington">Analyst Kenneth Worthington</a> upgraded the rating for Janus Henderson Group from Neutral to Overweight, while raising the price target from $44 to $53.
The Janus Henderson Group Thesis: The company reported fourth-quarter adjusted revenue of $568 million, up 16% sequentially and 25% year-on-year, "driven by higher AUM, improving net sales, and performance fees," Worthington said in the upgrade note.
Check out <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings">other analyst stock ratings</a>.
Here&#8217;s a breakdown of Janus Henderson's report:
<ul>
<li>Solid net sales of $3.3 billion were driven by fixed-income strategies, Worthington stated, praising the "growing suite of fixed-income ETF products.&#8221;</li>
<li>Adjusted earnings came in at $1.07 per share, surpassing expectations</li>
<li>Operating margin expanded to 36.1%, from the previous quarter's 34.9% and the year-ago quarter's 34.3%</li>
<li>Other concerns are mitigated by accelerating ETF flows, improving institutional flows, a solid longer-term performance track record, and a build out of &#8220;new products," Worthington added.</li>
</ul>
Price Action: Shares of Janus had risen by 2.18% to $44.98 at the time of publication on Wednesday.
Read More: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/hedge-funds/24/11/41995340/nelson-peltzs-trian-fund-management-reshaped-portfolio-ahead-of-presidential-election">Nelson Peltz&#8217;s Trian Fund Management Reshaped Portfolio Ahead Of Presidential Election</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Earnings Beats

Long Ideas

Movers

Janus Henderson Group plc Ordinary Shares

Janus Henderson Is A 'Turnaround Story' With Growing Suite Of Fixed Income ETFs: Analyst

FBS Global Limited (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FBGL#NASDAQ">FBGL</a>) IPO will take place February, 06 on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker FBGL.
The company is offering shares at an expected price between $4.50 and $5.00 per share with an insider lock-up period of 180 days ending on August 05, 2025.
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/ipos">Benzinga IPO Calendar</a>
<h3>About FBS Global Limited</h3>
FBS Global Limited is a Singapore based green building contractor and an established interior fit-out specialist. with a track record of over 20 years in institutional, residential, commercial and industrial building projects
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">Benzinga's Most Shorted Stocks</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

IPOs

FBGL

Fbs Global Limited To Start Trading Tomorrow

JPMorgan ETFs IE ICAV Glb Eq Multi-Factor UCITS ETF EUR Acc

Comments

News

Latest news for (OTC:JPGLF) Stock

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga