Option chain shows key data for JVSPAC Acquisition's stock options at various strike prices and expiration dates. Traders use this information to analyze potential trades and assess market sentiment for JVSPAC Acquisition.

JVSPAC Acquisition (NASDAQ:JVSAU) Stock, Option Chain

JVSPAC Acquisition Corp is blank check company.

JVSPAC Acquisition Corp

Amidst the fast-paced and highly competitive business environment of today, conducting comprehensive company analysis is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Broadline Retail industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>47.12</td>
<td>8.95</td>
<td>3.80</td>
<td>6.19%</td>
<td>$32.08</td>
<td>$31.0</td>
<td>11.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>17.60</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>1.59</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
<td>$54.02</td>
<td>$92.47</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>10.04</td>
<td>3.68</td>
<td>2.92</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>60.89</td>
<td>21.74</td>
<td>4.76</td>
<td>10.37%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>35.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>11.79</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>0.37</td>
<td>5.22%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>39.66</td>
<td>9.69</td>
<td>1.40</td>
<td>1.74%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>16.15</td>
<td>5.67</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>11.59%</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>23.87</td>
<td>5.64</td>
<td>3.89</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>6.42</td>
<td>1.33</td>
<td>0.48</td>
<td>2.76%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>-9.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>34.07</td>
<td>4.34</td>
<td>3.14</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>11.21</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>1.05</td>
<td>6.37%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>-3.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>25.98</td>
<td>1.06</td>
<td>0.19</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>-3.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>14.49</td>
<td>3.82</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>22.41</td>
<td>3.81</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>5.09%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>6.25</td>
<td>0.41</td>
<td>0.09</td>
<td>0.58%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>-8.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groupon Inc</td>
<td>15.68</td>
<td>10.76</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>34.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-9.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>21.1</td>
<td>5.25</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>7.12%</td>
<td>$6.98</td>
<td>$14.45</td>
<td>7.84%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By closely examining Amazon.com, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 47.12, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio significantly exceeds the industry average by 2.23x, suggesting a premium valuation relative to industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 8.95, which is 1.7x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 3.8, which is 2.26x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.19%, which is 0.93% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.08 Billion, which is 4.6x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $31.0 Billion, which indicates 2.15x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 11.04% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 7.84%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620445_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Amazon.com can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, Amazon.com exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For PE, PB, and PS ratios, Amazon.com is considered overvalued compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This is indicated by the high PE, PB, and PS ratios. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Amazon.com's performance is below average within the industry sector. The low ROE and high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest potential areas for improvement in Amazon.com's financial performance compared to its industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

News

Markets

Trading Ideas

AMZN

Comparative Study: Amazon.com And Industry Competitors In Broadline Retail Industry

Brazilian soccer legend Neymar is equally known for his flashy lifestyle and dazzling skills on the field. His latest real estate purchase – a $54.45 million home in <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/dubai">Dubai</a>'s Bugatti Building – keeps that reputation intact.
Now at the tail end of his career and playing in the Saudi Pro League alongside Ronaldo and Karim Benzema, Neymar (whose full name is Neymar da Silva Santos Jr) has a net worth of $350 million. His current salary is around $4 million per week over two years. He has continually purchased lavish homes in the cities where he has played soccer or had a close affinity – Barcelona, Rio, Paris and Sao Paulo. He also recently purchased a Miami waterfront plot for $26 million, where he plans to build a 13,000-square-foot home using London-based design firm Elicyon. His latest purchase could top them all.&nbsp;
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li>Unlock the hidden potential of commercial real estate —<a href="https://equitymultiple.com/benzinga?invite=benzinga&amp;utm_campaign=product-promotion-earn&amp;utm_source=yahooFinance&amp;utm_medium=affiliate&amp;utm_content=unlockboost-yahoo"> This platform allows individuals to invest in commercial real estate offering a 12% target yield with a bonus 1% return boost today!</a></li>
<li>Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl-y2"> you can become an investor for $0.80 per share today.</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Dubai's French Riviera</h2>
Nestled in Dubai's exclusive Business Bay, the as-yet-unfinished home will feature a private car elevator capable of transporting vehicles directly to the penthouse and a private swimming pool with panoramic views of Downtown Dubai. Neymar has chosen one of the 11 Sky Mansion Penthouses. The building enjoys an exclusive beach, drawing inspiration from the French Riviera.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An Endorsement-Laden Career</h2>
Despite being lauded as one of the best soccer players of his generation, Neymar's career has been dogged with injuries, which, coupled with his playboy reputation, has left many people feeling that the icon never reached his full potential athletically. Despite this, he has enjoyed a lucrative endorsement-laden career, with Puma – whose sponsorship is worth $30 million per year – and Red Bull among the notable brands that have paid big bucks to have the Brazilian superstar tout their name.
See Also: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/go/arrived-private-credit-yf">7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it</a>?
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">254 Million Social Media Followers</h2>
He also has a rabid 226 million followers on Instagram (not including his Facebook following). Neymar is paid an incredible $500K (as of 2023) bonus for every Instagram post promoting Saudi Arabia. According to some online speculation, this doesn't include the branded posts he does for other companies, which are reportedly worth over $1 million per post.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Getting Paid To Game</h2>
Though only 32, due to his history of injuries, it's doubtful Neymar will continue playing into his late thirties like his contemporaries <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/cristiano-ronaldo">Ronaldo</a> and <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/lionel-messi">Messi</a>. That doesn't mean his financial net worth will diminish. In fact, as with David Beckham – a co-owner of MLS team Inter Miami CF who is worth $450 million – it could explode.
Trending: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/connect-invest-real-estate-notes-y2">These high-yield real estate notes that pay 7.5% &#8211; 9% make earning passive income easier than ever.</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Long-Term Commitment To Saudi Arabia</h2>
Neymar recently signed a deal with Facebook to stream gaming live. He has 254 million followers across Facebook and Instagram. He'll stream gameplay multiple times each month and play with a different creator once a month.
Neymar is also an ambassador of Saudi Arabia's bid to host the 2034 World Cup, a role that will extend far beyond his playing days.
However, before Neymar finally hung up his boots, a Brazilian news outlet stated that he was keen to return to his homeland and play for his first club, Santos. As speculation grew, Neymar, who has many lucrative Saudi endorsement deals to fulfill, shot the rumors down:
"The opportunity to play here and live in a country like this is very important for people. That is why I always say that I was very well received here. I am very happy and I am sure it will only get better. I am sure other stars will come here. I believe that many will have the opportunity to come here and I think that everyone should have the opportunity to experience what I have experienced here."&nbsp;
Read Next:
<ul>
<li>Commercial real estate has historically outperformed the stock market, and<a href="https://equitymultiple.com/benzinga?invite=benzinga&amp;utm_campaign=product-promotion-earn&amp;utm_source=yahooFinance&amp;utm_medium=affiliate&amp;utm_content=stockmarket-yahoo"> this platform allows individuals to invest in commercial real estate with as little as $5,000 offering a 12% target yield with a bonus 1% return boost today!</a></li>
<li>This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to <a href="https://arrivedhomes.go2cloud.org/aff_c?offer_id=15&amp;aff_id=1006&amp;aff_sub=yahoo&amp;aff_sub2=byerscta100">become a landlord in just 10 minutes, with minimum investments as low as $100 for properties like the Byer House from Stranger Things.</a></li>
</ul>

Soccer Star Neymar Spends $54 Million To Buy In Dubai's Bugatti Building. His Real Estate History Is As Flashy As His Foot Skills

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully assess companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) against its key competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>28.18</td>
<td>9.16</td>
<td>10.03</td>
<td>9.77%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>18.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>24.99</td>
<td>7.34</td>
<td>6.94</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>11.71</td>
<td>0.87</td>
<td>1.69</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>93.34</td>
<td>6.98</td>
<td>5.98</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>30.89</td>
<td>2.95</td>
<td>6.37</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>352</td>
<td>2.17</td>
<td>3.23</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>23.18</td>
<td>3.38</td>
<td>1.97</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.85</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>41.47</td>
<td>1.36</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>11.42</td>
<td>0.39</td>
<td>1.05</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>49.81</td>
<td>1.91</td>
<td>1.06</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>7.84</td>
<td>0.83</td>
<td>0.93</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>59.41</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>2.96</td>
<td>2.99%</td>
<td>$4.21</td>
<td>$6.75</td>
<td>4.12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When conducting a detailed analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends become clear: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 28.18 is 0.47x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 9.16, which is 3.5x the industry average, Meta Platforms might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 10.03, which is 3.39x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.77% is 6.78% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion, which is 5.24x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 4.92x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 18.87% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 4.12%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620435_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Meta Platforms against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest the market values its assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Industry Comparison: Evaluating Meta Platforms Against Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>40.80</td>
<td>65.84</td>
<td>9.77</td>
<td>23.83%</td>
<td>$32.5</td>
<td>$43.88</td>
<td>6.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>10.67</td>
<td>1.08</td>
<td>0.91</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>9.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>21.78</td>
<td>26.96</td>
<td>3.86</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>69.85</td>
<td>1.89</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>4.28%</td>
<td>$0.86</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>48.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>160.49</td>
<td>14.48</td>
<td>7.25</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.54</td>
<td>8.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>16.05</td>
<td>3.45</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>9.63</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>0.59</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>51.76</td>
<td>3.16</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>26.24</td>
<td>1.09</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>45.81</td>
<td>6.58</td>
<td>2.12</td>
<td>7.36%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>21.95%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By carefully studying Apple, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 40.8 significantly below the industry average by 0.89x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 65.84, which is 10.01x the industry average, Apple might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.77, surpassing the industry average by 4.61x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.83% is 16.47% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.5 Billion is 85.53x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $43.88 Billion, which indicates 54.85x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 6.07% is significantly below the industry average of 21.95%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620427_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When evaluating Apple alongside its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights arise:
<ul>
<li>
Apple falls in the middle of the list when considering the debt-to-equity ratio.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a moderate level of debt relative to its equity with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.87, suggesting a balanced financial structure with a reasonable debt-equitymix.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest that the market values Apple's assets and sales highly. Apple's high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit reflect strong profitability, while the low revenue growth may indicate a need for expansion strategies to align with industry trends.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

In-Depth Analysis: Apple Versus Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Software industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>36.12</td>
<td>11.30</td>
<td>12.86</td>
<td>8.87%</td>
<td>$38.23</td>
<td>$45.49</td>
<td>16.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>40.44</td>
<td>33.66</td>
<td>8.56</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>165.26</td>
<td>23.56</td>
<td>21.06</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>22.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>48.96</td>
<td>20.95</td>
<td>16.18</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>684.67</td>
<td>28.13</td>
<td>23.34</td>
<td>-0.57%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>28.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>46.91</td>
<td>78.80</td>
<td>12.61</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>27.99</td>
<td>8.14</td>
<td>4.53</td>
<td>7.92%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>3.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>539.16</td>
<td>11.90</td>
<td>13.14</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>28.69</td>
<td>2.97</td>
<td>5.90</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>40.33</td>
<td>25.01</td>
<td>7.99</td>
<td>5.56%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>16.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>28.05</td>
<td>1.44</td>
<td>25.56</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>31.19</td>
<td>11.50</td>
<td>8.95</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>37.21</td>
<td>24.22</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>35.56</td>
<td>6.67</td>
<td>4.10</td>
<td>6.88%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>63.14</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>3.03</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>129.83</td>
<td>19.91</td>
<td>11.19</td>
<td>13.66%</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>$1.28</td>
<td>11.24%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a meticulous analysis of Microsoft, we can observe the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 36.12, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.28x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 11.3, which is well below the industry average by 0.57x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 12.86, surpassing the industry average by 1.15x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.87%, which is 4.79% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.23 Billion, which is 63.72x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $45.49 Billion, which indicates 35.54x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 16.04% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 11.24%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620419_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Microsoft can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest that the stock is undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high PS ratio indicates that the stock may be overvalued based on revenue. In terms of ROE, Microsoft's performance is lower than its peers, while its high EBITDA and gross profit margins indicate strong operational efficiency. Additionally, the high revenue growth rate suggests potential for future expansion and market dominance.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Evaluating Microsoft Against Peers In Software Industry

TransMedics Gr (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TMDX#NASDAQ">TMDX</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 13.58% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 26.54%. Currently, TransMedics Gr has a market capitalization of $2.08 billion. 
Buying $100 In TMDX: If an investor had bought $100 of TMDX stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $323.15 today based on a price of $61.85 for TMDX at the time of writing.
<h3>TransMedics Gr's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620413_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

TMDX

$100 Invested In TransMedics Gr 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

In the current market session, WillScot Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WSC#NASDAQ">WSC</a>) price is at $34.36, after a 0.47% spike. However, over the past month, the stock fell by 2.98%, and in the past year, by 23.28%. Shareholders might be interested in knowing whether the stock is undervalued, even if the company is performing up to par in the current session. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620411_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>WillScot Holdings P/E Compared to Competitors</h3>
The P/E ratio measures the current share price to the company's EPS. It is used by long-term investors to analyze the company's current performance against it's past earnings, historical data and aggregate market data for the industry or the indices, such as S&amp;P 500. A higher P/E indicates that investors expect the company to perform better in the future, and the stock is probably overvalued, but not necessarily. It also could indicate that investors are willing to pay a higher share price currently, because they expect the company to perform better in the upcoming quarters. This leads investors to also remain optimistic about rising dividends in the future. 
Compared to the aggregate P/E ratio of 36.82 in the Construction &amp; Engineering industry, WillScot Holdings Inc. has a higher P/E ratio of 285.17. Shareholders might be inclined to think that WillScot Holdings Inc. might perform better than its industry group. It's also possible that the stock is overvalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620411_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Intraday Update

Price Over Earnings Overview: WillScot Holdings

Amidst today's fast-paced and highly competitive business environment, it is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>50.89</td>
<td>47.91</td>
<td>28.30</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>173.35</td>
<td>15.43</td>
<td>20.72</td>
<td>-2.77%</td>
<td>$6.39</td>
<td>$8.36</td>
<td>47.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>31.33</td>
<td>8.25</td>
<td>12.42</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
<td>$555.05</td>
<td>$439.35</td>
<td>38.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>107.44</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>8.17</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>17.12</td>
<td>6.47</td>
<td>4.44</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>34.39</td>
<td>9.77</td>
<td>10.81</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-8.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>225.76</td>
<td>23.87</td>
<td>41.05</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.77</td>
<td>2.47</td>
<td>4.01</td>
<td>1.99%</td>
<td>$3.63</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>93.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>63.34</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>10.99</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>-10.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>38.99</td>
<td>4.80</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>67.38</td>
<td>12.40</td>
<td>14.34</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>16.11</td>
<td>3.22</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>10.27</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>-26.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>19.59</td>
<td>2.24</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>15.87</td>
<td>2.60</td>
<td>5.14</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.39</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>2.33</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>24.01</td>
<td>2.24</td>
<td>3.42</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>127.39</td>
<td>8.52</td>
<td>13.36</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>57.40</td>
<td>11.48</td>
<td>14.42</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.90</td>
<td>4.45</td>
<td>11.02</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>57.88</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>9.94</td>
<td>3.48%</td>
<td>$33.38</td>
<td>$27.13</td>
<td>8.28%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a thorough examination of NVIDIA, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 50.89 is lower than the industry average by 0.88x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 47.91 relative to the industry average by 7.15x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 28.3, which is 2.85x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% is 27.65% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.68x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.96x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 93.61%, which surpasses the industry average of 8.28%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620410_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio provides insights into the proportion of debt a company has in relation to its equity and asset value.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For NVIDIA, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. A high ROE reflects efficient use of shareholder equity. The low EBITDA and gross profit may indicate room for improvement in operational efficiency. The high revenue growth rate signals strong sales performance relative to industry peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Performance Comparison: NVIDIA And Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Chainlink's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/link/usd">LINK</a>) price has decreased 8.53% over the past 24 hours to $24.59, continuing its downward trend over the past week of -13.0%, moving from $28.4 to its current price. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Chainlink over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620406_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has fallen 34.0% over the past week which is opposite, directionally, with the overall circulating supply of the coin, which has increased 0.08%. This brings the circulating supply to 626.85 million, which makes up an estimated 62.68% of its max supply of 1.00 billion. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for LINK is #13 at $15.42 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1734620406_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$LINK

Test0.9931786450199349: Chainlink Falls More Than 8% In 24 hours

APCX

AppTech Payments Shares Halted On Circuit Breaker To The Upside, Stock Now Up 236%

Intel Corp&#8216;s (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTC#NASDAQ">INTC</a>) stock plunged 59% over the past year, leaving investors to question whether the company is facing a long-term decline or gearing <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/intel">up for a rebound</a>.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://bzresearch.myclickfunnels.com/benzinga-pro-content-webinar-registration/?utm_source=BZprocontent121924&amp;t=be2bearmibe3na1"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="630" height="493" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/19072525/Screenshot-2024-12-19-at-5.55.12-PM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-699546" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/19072525/Screenshot-2024-12-19-at-5.55.12-PM.png 630w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/19072525/Screenshot-2024-12-19-at-5.55.12-PM-300x235.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 630px) 100vw, 630px" /></a></figure>
<a href="https://bzresearch.myclickfunnels.com/benzinga-pro-content-webinar-registration/?utm_source=BZprocontent121924&amp;t=be2bearmibe3na1">Chart created using Benzinga Pro</a>
Technically, the signals are stark. Intel stock is trading below its eight, 20, 50, and 200-day simple moving averages, implying deep bear territory. The company&#8217;s moving average convergence/divergence (MACD) indicator is at a negative 1.05, implying negative trading momentum towards Intel stock. Further, the relative strength index (RSI) of 31.35 suggests it's edging into oversold territory.
Overall, the charts paint a very bearish picture for the stock, with the nearly oversold RSI lending some hope of a reversal.
The fundamentals paint a more nuanced picture.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/24/12/42435733/taiwan-semi-founder-calls-for-new-strategy-after-intel-chiefs-departure">Taiwan Semi Founder Calls For New Strategy After Intel Chief&#8217;s Departure</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Intel Stock: Chips, Competition, Challenges</h2>
Intel stock trades 10-20% below its book value—a fact that might limit downside risk. 
Despite a flurry of bad press and declining stock performance, Intel generates $50 billion in annual revenue and maintains a healthy debt-to-equity ratio. While its profit margins have narrowed, even conservative estimates suggest profitability isn't off the table.
Intel's dominance in the CPU market is holding steady at 60-70%, primarily due to its grip on the OEM sector. 
Meanwhile, Advanced Micro Devices Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMD#NASDAQ">AMD</a>) is making gains, particularly in the DIY PC market. Stability issues with Raptor Lake CPUs and underwhelming Core Ultra chips have tarnished Intel's reputation, but its newer Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake chips aim to reclaim market share by 2025.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">18A Process, Foundry Prospects</h2>
The much-hyped 18A chip process could be a game-changer, with defect densities nearing industry benchmarks. 
Intel's foundry business has also shown potential, landing a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/09/40904754/amazons-leaner-structure-and-ai-chip-partnership-with-intel-could-boost-growth-bofa">deal to produce</a> Amazon.com Inc's (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) AI chips. However, execution risks loom large, and geopolitical factors like U.S.-Taiwan tariffs could shift the playing field dramatically.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Battlemage Surprise</h2>
Intel's <a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/shopping/intel-officially-reveals-battlemage-gpus/ar-AA1vfqzT">Battlemage</a> B580 graphics card is another wildcard. While not groundbreaking in specs, its affordability has made it a hit, showcasing the company's ability to innovate in niche areas.
Intel remains a battleground stock, balancing bearish trends with signs of resilience. Investors face a complex choice: wait for recovery or brace for more downside.
Read Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/media/24/12/42482813/intel-cfo-hints-at-possible-division-split-as-company-struggles-to-recapture-moat">Intel CFO Hints at Possible Division Split as Company Struggles To Recapture Moat</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Technicals

Tech

INTC

Intel Stock Charts Suggests Bearish Trend, Fundamentals Hint At Potential Rebound

Wells Fargo analyst Eva Fortea Verdejo maintains ITeos Therapeutics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ITOS#NASDAQ">ITOS</a>) with a Overweight and lowers the price target from $31 to $19.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

ITOS

Wells Fargo Maintains Overweight on ITeos Therapeutics, Lowers Price Target to $19

PRFX

PainReform Shares Halted On Circuit Breaker To The Upside, Stock Now Up 463.6%

NUKK

Nukkleus Shares Halted On Circuit Breaker To The Upside, Stock Now Up 27.6%

Wells Fargo analyst Derek Archila maintains argenx (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARGX#NASDAQ">ARGX</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $639 to $723.

ARGX

Wells Fargo Maintains Overweight on argenx, Raises Price Target to $723

Wells Fargo analyst Derek Archila maintains Zymeworks (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZYME#NASDAQ">ZYME</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $12 to $14.

ZYME

Wells Fargo Maintains Equal-Weight on Zymeworks, Raises Price Target to $14

VRAR

The Glimpse Group Shares Resume Trading

PainReform Shares Resume Trade

Wells Fargo analyst Derek Archila maintains Kezar Life Sciences (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KZR#NASDAQ">KZR</a>) with a Equal-Weight and lowers the price target from $11 to $9.

Wells Fargo Maintains Equal-Weight on Kezar Life Sciences, Lowers Price Target to $9

DEVS

DevvStream Shares Halted On Circuit Breaker To The Downside, Stock Now Up 18.5%

Hotel101 to go public via $2.3 bln SPAC deal

JVSAU

Offerings

Press Releases

JVSPAC Acquisition Corp. Announces Pricing of $50 Million Initial Public Offering

JVSPAC Acquisition Corp. Announces Closing of $57.5 Million Initial Public Offering, Including Full Exercise of Underwriter's Over-Allotment Option

Arcosa

AECOM

Argan

Ameresco

APi Gr

Cadeler A/S American Depositary Share (each representing four (4) Ordinary Shares)

Comments

JVSPAC Acquisition

JVSPAC Acquisition (JVSAU) Options

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga