iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (ARCA: LQDH)

Latest news for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (ARCA:LQDH)

iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF

The fund seeks to invest, at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds, in one or more underlying funds that principally invest in investment-grade bonds and in U.S. Treasury securities. It is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.

Ishares Iboxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Blackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares

Long Ideas

Bonds

Specialty ETFs

Trading Ideas

ETFs

LQDH

The Right Bond ETF For Fed Fun

News

Reconsidering High-Grade Corporate Bond ETFs

WIIM

SENS

Senseonics shares are trading higher after the company reported preliminary unaudited Q4 revenue of approximately $8.3M and full-year 2024 revenue of approximately $22.5M.

MIMI

Trading Halt: Halt status updated at 10:10:00 AM ET: Quotation Resumption: IPO Security - Released for Quotation

Scotiabank analyst Holly Stewart reinstates Cheniere Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LNG#NYSE">LNG</a>) with a Sector Outperform and announces $242 price target.

Price Target

Initiation

Analyst Ratings

Scotiabank Reinstates Sector Outperform on Cheniere Energy, Announces $242 Price Target

MVST

Microvast shares are trading higher after the company announced a developments in its True All-Solid-State Battery technology.

JMP Securities analyst Nicholas Jones reiterates Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) with a Market Outperform and maintains $285 price target.

Reiteration

AMZN

JMP Securities Reiterates Market Outperform on Amazon.com, Maintains $285 Price Target

CPRI

Capri shares are trading higher amid reports suggesting Prada may be a potential buyer for Capri's Versace.

Scotiabank analyst Holly Stewart reinstates Plains All American (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PAA#NASDAQ">PAA</a>) with a Sector Outperform and announces $23 price target.

Scotiabank Reinstates Sector Outperform on Plains All American, Announces $23 Price Target

JMP Securities analyst Roy Buchanan reiterates Abivax (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ABVX#NASDAQ">ABVX</a>) with a Market Outperform and maintains $33 price target.

ABVX

JMP Securities Reiterates Market Outperform on Abivax, Maintains $33 Price Target

Scotiabank analyst Brandon Bingham reinstates ONEOK (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OKE#NYSE">OKE</a>) with a Sector Outperform and announces $109 price target.

Scotiabank Reinstates Sector Outperform on ONEOK, Announces $109 Price Target

Kazia Therapeutics Limited (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KZIA#NASDAQ">KZIA</a>) ("Kazia" or the "Company"), an oncology-focused drug development company, today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement for the purchase and sale of up to an aggregate of 1,333,333 of the Company's American Depositary Shares ("ADSs") (or ADS equivalents in lieu thereof), each ADS representing 100 ordinary shares of the Company, at a purchase price of $1.50 per ADS (or ADS equivalent in lieu thereof), in a registered direct offering. The Company has also agreed to issue, in a concurrent private placement, unregistered warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,333,333 ADSs. The warrants will have an exercise price of $1.50 per ADS, will be immediately exercisable upon issuance, and will expire five and one-half years from the date of issuance. The closing of the offering is expected to occur on or about January 13, 2025, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.
Maxim Group LLC is acting as the exclusive placement agent for the registered direct offering and concurrent private placement.
The gross proceeds to the Company from the offering are expected to be approximately $2.0 million, before deducting the placement agent's fees and other offering expenses payable by the Company. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, which may include working capital, expenses related to research, clinical development and commercial efforts, and general and administrative expenses.

Offerings

KZIA

Kazia Therapeutics Announces $2M Registered Direct Offering Of 1,333,333 Of The Company's American Depositary Shares, Each Ads Representing 100 Ordinary Shares Of The Company, At A Purchase Price Of $1.50 Per ADS

Argus Research analyst Taylor Conrad maintains Bath &amp; Body Works (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BBWI#NYSE">BBWI</a>) from Hold to Hold.

BBWI

Argus Research Maintains Hold on Bath & Body Worksto Hold

Scotiabank analyst Brandon Bingham reinstates Kinetik Holdings (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KNTK#NYSE">KNTK</a>) with a Sector Outperform and announces $64 price target.

KNTK

Scotiabank Reinstates Sector Outperform on Kinetik Holdings, Announces $64 Price Target

TD SYNNEX Corp&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SNX#NYSE">SNX</a>)&nbsp;shares are trading higher on Friday after the company&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/01/b42910517/td-synnex-reports-fiscal-2024-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-results" rel="noreferrer noopener">reported its&nbsp;fourth-quarter results</a>.
Quarterly revenue of&nbsp;$15.85 billion, up&nbsp;10%&nbsp;Y/Y,&nbsp;exceeded the analyst view of&nbsp;$15.22 billion.
The Fremont, California-based company reported an adjusted EPS of&nbsp;$3.09,&nbsp;beating the&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/earnings" rel="noreferrer noopener">street view of&nbsp;$3.05</a>.
On a constant currency basis, revenue increased&nbsp;9.2%, led by growth in both the Advanced Solutions and Endpoint Solutions portfolios.
Adjusted gross billings were&nbsp;$21.2&nbsp;billion in the quarter under review, compared to&nbsp;$19.7&nbsp;billion in the prior-year quarter.
Gross profit rose to $1.04 billion from $1.02 billion in the prior year quarter, while margin declined to 6.6% from 7.1%.
Adjusted operating income stood at&nbsp;$422&nbsp;million&nbsp;versus&nbsp;$427&nbsp;million&nbsp;a year ago quarter, with an adjusted margin of&nbsp;2.7%&nbsp;versus&nbsp;3.0%&nbsp;in the same period last year.
TD SYNNEX returned&nbsp;$136&nbsp;million to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.
Dividend: TD SYNNEX&#8217;s Board of Directors raised a quarterly cash dividend by 10% to&nbsp;$0.44 per share, payable on January 31, to stockholders of record as of January 24.
Outlook: TD SYNNEX expects&nbsp;first-quarter&nbsp;adjusted EPS of&nbsp;$2.65&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;$3.15,&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/guidance" rel="noreferrer noopener">compared to the estimate of&nbsp;$2.95</a>.
The company projects revenue of&nbsp;$14.4 billion &#8211; $15.2 billion, vs. the estimated&nbsp;$14.769 billion.
Patrick Zammit, CEO of TD SYNNEX, said, &#8220;Gross billings in Q4 grew 7% year-over-year and we returned 72% of our free cash flow to shareholders in fiscal year 2024. Building on our momentum, we believe we&#8217;re well-positioned for the year ahead as we anticipate the IT spending environment will continue to improve.&#8221;
Investors can gain exposure to the stock via&nbsp;Tidal Trust III Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RSMC#NYSE">RSMC</a>) and Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco S&amp;P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RWK#NYSE">RWK</a>).
Price Action:&nbsp;SNX shares are up&nbsp;5.84%&nbsp;at&nbsp;$129.23 at the last check Friday.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/market-summary/25/01/42908495/us-stocks-to-open-on-a-tentative-note-as-traders-remain-cautious-ahead-of-fridays-crucial-jobs-data" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">US Stocks To Open On A Tentative Note As Traders Remain Cautious Ahead Of Friday&#8217;s Crucial Jobs Data</a></li>
</ul>

Earnings

Equities

Large Cap

Guidance

Dividends

Movers

Tidal Trust III Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF

RSMC

TD SYNNEX Delivers Strong Q4, Raises Dividend Amid IT Growth Momentum; Stock Gains

Macro Economic Events

Econ #s

Economics

Michigan Current Conditions For January 77.9 Vs 75.1 Prior

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully assess companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Netflix (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>) against its key competitors in the Entertainment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Netflix Background</h3>
Netflix's relatively simple business model involves only one business, its streaming service. It has the biggest television entertainment subscriber base in both the United States and the collective international market, with more than 280 million subscribers globally. Netflix has exposure to nearly the entire global population outside of China. The firm has traditionally avoided live programming or sports content, instead focusing on on-demand access to episodic television, movies, and documentaries. The firm recently began introducing ad-supported subscription plans, giving the firm exposure to the advertising market in addition to the subscription fees that have historically accounted for nearly all its revenue.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Netflix Inc</td>
<td>49.46</td>
<td>16.46</td>
<td>10.26</td>
<td>10.54%</td>
<td>$6.69</td>
<td>$4.7</td>
<td>15.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Live Nation Entertainment Inc</td>
<td>146.42</td>
<td>104.35</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>324.7%</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>$1.87</td>
<td>-6.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tencent Music Entertainment Group</td>
<td>20.94</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>4.51</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$2.17</td>
<td>$2.99</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Warner Music Group Corp</td>
<td>35.30</td>
<td>29.30</td>
<td>2.36</td>
<td>8.19%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>2.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scienjoy Holding Corp</td>
<td>5.71</td>
<td>0.22</td>
<td>0.18</td>
<td>0.06%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>-12.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>52.09</td>
<td>34.0</td>
<td>2.08</td>
<td>83.87%</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>$1.43</td>
<td>-2.38%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After thoroughly examining Netflix, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 49.46 significantly below the industry average by 0.95x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 16.46, which is 0.48x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 10.26, which is 4.93x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.54%, which is 73.33% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $6.69 Billion, which is 8.47x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $4.7 Billion, which indicates 3.29x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 15.02% is notably higher compared to the industry average of -2.38%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521251_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Netflix with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
In the context of the debt-to-equity ratio, Netflix holds a middle position among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates a moderate level of debt relative to its equity with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.7, which implies a relatively balanced financial structure with a reasonable debt-equity mix.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Netflix, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB ratio is also low, suggesting a possible bargain opportunity. However, the PS ratio is high, signaling overvaluation based on revenue. In terms of ROE, Netflix shows lower profitability compared to peers. EBITDA and gross profit margins are high, reflecting strong operational performance. Additionally, Netflix's revenue growth rate is high, outperforming industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

NFLX

Insights Into Netflix's Performance Versus Peers In Entertainment Sector

Michigan Consumer Expectations For January 70.2 Vs 73.3 Prior

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Tesla (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>) and its primary competitors in the Automobiles industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Tesla Background</h3>
Tesla is a vertically integrated battery electric vehicle automaker and developer of autonomous driving software. The company has multiple vehicles in its fleet, which include luxury and midsize sedans, crossover SUVs, a light truck, and a semi truck. Tesla also plans to begin selling more affordable vehicles, a sports car, and a robotaxi. Global deliveries in 2024 were a little below 1.8 million vehicles. The company sells batteries for stationary storage for residential and commercial properties including utilities and solar panels and solar roofs for energy generation. Tesla also owns a fast-charging network.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Tesla Inc</td>
<td>108.20</td>
<td>18.13</td>
<td>14.19</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$4.22</td>
<td>$5.0</td>
<td>7.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Toyota Motor Corp</td>
<td>9.62</td>
<td>1.16</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>1.64%</td>
<td>$1449.68</td>
<td>$2438.49</td>
<td>0.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thor Industries Inc</td>
<td>24.29</td>
<td>1.25</td>
<td>0.53</td>
<td>-0.05%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>-14.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>16.95</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>0.71</td>
<td>0.79%</td>
<td>$724.88</td>
<td>$1219.38</td>
<td>-7.11%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a thorough examination of Tesla, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 108.2, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio significantly exceeds the industry average by 6.38x, suggesting a premium valuation relative to industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 18.13, which is 14.98x the industry average, Tesla might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 14.19, which is 19.99x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 3.18% that is 2.39% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $4.22 Billion, which is 0.01x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $5.0 Billion, which indicates 0.0x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 7.85% is notably higher compared to the industry average of -7.11%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521237_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Tesla can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Tesla is positioned in the middle among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a relatively balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a moderate level of debt while also utilizing equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
In comparison to its peers in the Automobiles industry, Tesla's PE, PB, and PS ratios are all considered high, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. On the other hand, Tesla's high ROE and revenue growth suggest strong performance relative to its competitors. However, the low EBITDA and gross profit figures may raise concerns about the company's operational efficiency and profitability.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

TSLA

In-Depth Analysis: Tesla Versus Competitors In Automobiles Industry

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) against its key competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>28.82</td>
<td>9.37</td>
<td>10.25</td>
<td>9.77%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>18.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>96.47</td>
<td>7.21</td>
<td>6.18</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>320.33</td>
<td>1.98</td>
<td>2.94</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>23.79</td>
<td>3.47</td>
<td>2.02</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>11.90</td>
<td>0.40</td>
<td>1.09</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>39.08</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.25</td>
<td>0.62</td>
<td>1.35</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>58</td>
<td>2.23</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>7.39</td>
<td>0.78</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vtex</td>
<td>126.60</td>
<td>4.21</td>
<td>5.01</td>
<td>1.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shutterstock Inc</td>
<td>30.07</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>1.22</td>
<td>3.38%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>7.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZipRecruiter Inc</td>
<td>227</td>
<td>48.96</td>
<td>1.36</td>
<td>-13.52%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-24.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yalla Group Ltd</td>
<td>5.32</td>
<td>0.93</td>
<td>2.19</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-4.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>79.35</td>
<td>6.18</td>
<td>2.27</td>
<td>1.18%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 28.82 is 0.36x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 9.37, which is 1.52x the industry average, Meta Platforms might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 10.25, which is 4.52x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.77% that is 8.59% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion is 245.11x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 97.68x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 18.87%, outperforming the industry average of 0.2%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521227_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Meta Platforms with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
Meta Platforms has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest the market values the company's assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comparing Meta Platforms With Industry Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Software industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>35.06</td>
<td>10.97</td>
<td>12.48</td>
<td>8.87%</td>
<td>$38.23</td>
<td>$45.49</td>
<td>16.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>39.89</td>
<td>33.19</td>
<td>8.44</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>163.41</td>
<td>23.30</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>22.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>44.83</td>
<td>19.18</td>
<td>14.81</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>528.79</td>
<td>11.67</td>
<td>12.89</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>26.81</td>
<td>1.38</td>
<td>24.42</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>29.67</td>
<td>10.94</td>
<td>8.51</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>36.61</td>
<td>23.83</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>34.05</td>
<td>6.38</td>
<td>3.93</td>
<td>6.88%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>63.91</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N-able Inc</td>
<td>47.10</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>3.86</td>
<td>1.44%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>8.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OneSpan Inc</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>3.61</td>
<td>2.94</td>
<td>4.43%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>94.55</td>
<td>12.5</td>
<td>9.58</td>
<td>8.32%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>8.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When conducting a detailed analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become clear: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 35.06 is 0.37x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 10.97, which is well below the industry average by 0.88x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 12.48, which is 1.3x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.87% is 0.55% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.23 Billion is 58.82x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $45.49 Billion, which indicates 33.7x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 16.04%, outperforming the industry average of 8.7%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1736521217_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Microsoft with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Microsoft has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the company is undervalued compared to its peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies that the market values Microsoft's sales more than its earnings or assets. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth indicate strong financial performance and operational efficiency relative to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Performance Comparison: Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry

Michigan 1-Year Inflation Expectations For January 3.3% Vs 2.8% Prior

2025 Perspectives: Optimism Through The Obstacles