Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (ARCA: RSPU)

Latest news for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (ARCA:RSPU)

Utilities

Other

The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Underlying Index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (S&P DJI or the Index Provider) compiles, maintains and calculates the Underlying Index, which is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500 Utilities Index (the Parent Index). The Parent Index is designed to measure the performance of common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500 Index that are classified as members of the utilities sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS), with a 22 company minimum count at each quarterly rebalance.

Ameren Corp.

Pinnacle West Capital Corp.

American Electric Power Co. Inc.

Alliant Energy Corp.

Eversource Energy

American Water Works Co. Inc.

Nisource Inc.

Atmos Energy Corp

Evergy Inc Sedol Bfmxgr0

Cms Energy Corp.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF

High,Voltage,Electricity,Towers,At,A,Substation,In,Central,California;

Sector ETFs

ETFs

GOOG

GOOGL

First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund

GRID

MSFT

RSPU

AI&#39;s impact on electricity demand is uncertain with the emergence of DeepSeek, causing confusion among investors and leading to a sell-off in power stocks. Less sensitive ETFs include XLU, RSPU, and GRID.

3 ETFs To Navigate Utility Stock Volatility As DeepSeek Challenges Power Demand Forecasts

News

Markets

Analyst Ratings

Trading Ideas

If you&#39;re interested in broad exposure to the Utilities - Broad segment of the equity market, look no further than the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (ARCA:RSPU), a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on 11/01/2006.

Should You Invest in the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF?

Newegg will release more inventory in real-time as stock becomes available.

NEGG

Newegg Commerce Says Experienced Overwhelming Response To The Launch Of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 Series GPUs, With Inventory Selling Out Within Minutes

Broadridge Financial Soln (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BR#NYSE">BR</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $1.56 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.47 by 6.12 percent. This is a 69.57 percent increase over earnings of $0.92 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $1.589 billion which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.556 billion by 2.10 percent. This is a 13.10 percent increase over sales of $1.405 billion the same period last year.

Earnings

Earnings Beats

Broadridge Financial Soln Q2 2025 Adj. EPS $1.56 Beats $1.47 Estimate, Sales $1.589B Beat $1.556B Estimate

Brookfield Renewable (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BEP#NYSE">BEP</a>) reported quarterly sales of $1.43 billion which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $1.45 billion by 0.90 percent. This is a 8.24 percent increase over sales of $1.32 billion the same period last year.

Earnings Misses

Brookfield Renewable Q4 Sales $1.43B Miss $1.45B Estimate

"The contracts associated with HPC/AI customers provide long-term, steady cash flows and earnings streams while our Bitcoin mining operations will continue to monetize Bitcoin's flexible upside potential, creating a powerful and resilient portfolio that will generate long-term value for our shareholders," the company said.

BITF

Bitfarms Says Its North American Portfolio Pipeline, Particularly Sites Located On PJM Grid, Is Strongly Suited For HPC/AI

CHTR

Charter Communications Q4 2024 GAAP EPS $10.10 Beats $9.22 Estimate, Sales $13.926B Beat $13.881B Estimate

BEPC

Brookfield Renewable Q4 2024 GAAP EPS $(0.06) Beats $(0.32) Estimate, Sales $1.432B Miss $1.445B Estimate

In parallel, ASG and WWT will help build accelerated sales and development strategies and market the sites on behalf of Bitfarms to potential customers.

Bitfarms Engages Engaged Two Expert Consultants To Develop HPC/AI Business

Needham analyst Matt Dezort reiterates Check Point Software (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CHKP#NASDAQ">CHKP</a>) from Hold to Hold.

Reiteration

CHKP

Needham Reiterates Hold on Check Point Softwareto Hold

Guidance

Church & Dwight Sees FY25 Sales Growth Of 2.5% - 3.5%; Q1 Growth Of About 1%

Hershey (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HSY#NYSE">HSY</a>) underwent analysis by 20 analysts in the last quarter, revealing a spectrum of viewpoints from bullish to bearish.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">14</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $162.95, a high estimate of $195.00, and a low estimate of $120.00. A decline of 7.58% from the prior average price target is evident in the current average. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738324851_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
The standing of Hershey among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$153.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Smith</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steve Powers</td>
<td>Deutsche Bank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$148.00</td>
<td>$184.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rob Dickerson</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$134.00</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Lazar</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Carey</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Grom</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$163.00</td>
<td>$189.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$153.00</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ken Goldman</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$151.00</td>
<td>$171.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Robert Moskow</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$172.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thomas Palmer</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sell</td>
<td>$159.00</td>
<td>$165.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Carey</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Carey</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Galbo</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nik Modi</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$183.00</td>
<td>$183.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Baumgartner</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Baumgartner</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Lazar</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>$202.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nik Modi</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$183.00</td>
<td>$205.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
<td>$165.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Hershey. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Hershey compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts gauge the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Hershey's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Hershey's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/HSY/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Hershey analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Hershey</h2>
Hershey is a leading us confectionery manufacturer (around a $25 billion market), controlling around 36% of the domestic chocolate space (per Euromonitor). Beyond its namesake label, the firm's mix has expanded over the last 85 years and now consists of 100 brands, including Reese's, Kit Kat, Kisses, and Ice Breakers. Hershey's products are sold in about 80 countries, albeit with just a high-single-digit percentage of sales coming from markets outside the us, including Brazil, India, and Mexico. The firm has sought inorganic opportunities to extend its reach beyond its core confection business, adding Amplify Snack Brands and its Skinny Pop ready-to-eat popcorn to its mix, Pirate Brands, and Dot's Pretzels over the past few years.
<h3>Hershey: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization: Positioned above industry average, the company's market capitalization underscores its superiority in size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Revenue Challenges: Hershey's revenue growth over 3 months faced difficulties. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -1.4%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Consumer Staples sector.
Net Margin: Hershey's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of 14.94%, the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Hershey's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of 10.87%, the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.
Return on Assets (ROA): Hershey's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 3.57%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 1.34, Hershey faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

A Glimpse Into The Expert Outlook On Hershey Through 20 Analysts

Across the recent three months, 12 analysts have shared their insights on Mondelez International (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MDLZ#NASDAQ">MDLZ</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Mondelez International, presenting an average target of $67.17, a high estimate of $75.00, and a low estimate of $61.00. Experiencing a 12.0% decline, the current average is now lower than the previous average price target of $76.33. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738324843_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
The standing of Mondelez International among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nik Modi</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Smith</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Powers</td>
<td>Deutsche Bank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rob Dickerson</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Ross</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
<td>$76.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lavery</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$84.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Leah Jordan</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$79.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thomas Palmer</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$71.00</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Carey</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$61.00</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Powers</td>
<td>Deutsche Bank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris Carey</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Mondelez International. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Mondelez International compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Mondelez International's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Mondelez International's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MDLZ/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Mondelez International analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About Mondelez International</h2>
Mondelez has operated as an independent organization since its split from the former Kraft Foods North American grocery business in October 2012. The firm is a leading player in the global snack enclave with a presence in the biscuit (49% of sales), chocolate (30%), gum/candy (12%), beverage (3%), and cheese and grocery (6%) aisles, as of the end of fiscal 2023. Mondelez's portfolio includes well-known brands like Oreo, Chips Ahoy, Halls, and Cadbury, among others. The firm derives around one third of revenue from developing markets, just more than one third from Europe, and the remainder from North America.
<h3>Breaking Down Mondelez International's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: Boasting an elevated market capitalization, the company surpasses industry averages. This signals substantial size and strong market recognition.
Revenue Growth: Mondelez International displayed positive results in 3 months. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 1.94%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Staples sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 9.27%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Mondelez International's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 3.07%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Mondelez International's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 1.17%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Mondelez International's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average at 0.73, reflecting a lower dependency on debt financing and a more conservative financial approach.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MDLZ

Assessing Mondelez International: Insights From 12 Financial Analysts

5 analysts have shared their evaluations of Pegasystems (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PEGA#NASDAQ">PEGA</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated Pegasystems and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $116.8, accompanied by a high estimate of $125.00 and a low estimate of $103.00. This upward trend is evident, with the current average reflecting a 25.93% increase from the previous average price target of $92.75.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738324835_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
A clear picture of Pegasystems's perception among financial experts is painted with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Raimo Lenschow</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$103.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Ives</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Celino</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$118.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rishi Jaluria</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steven Enders</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$123.00</td>
<td>$99.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Pegasystems. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Pegasystems compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Pegasystems's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PEGA/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Pegasystems analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know Pegasystems Better</h2>
Founded in 1983, Pegasystems provides a suite of solutions for customer engagement and business process management. The company's key offering is the Pega Infinity platform, which combines business process management, or BPM, with customer relationship management, or CRM, applications. The company focuses on enterprise-size customers, specifically within the financial, insurance, and healthcare fields.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Pegasystems's Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining Pegasystems's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -2.87% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Pegasystems's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of -4.43%, the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Pegasystems's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -3.17%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -0.92%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Pegasystems's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 1.23, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PEGA

Assessing Pegasystems: Insights From 5 Financial Analysts

Excelerate Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EE#NYSE">EE</a>) underwent analysis by 8 analysts in the last quarter, revealing a spectrum of viewpoints from bullish to bearish.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $30.0, a high estimate of $37.00, and a low estimate of $22.00. Surpassing the previous average price target of $24.62, the current average has increased by 21.85%.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738324827_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
A clear picture of Excelerate Energy's perception among financial experts is painted with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Devin McDermott</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marc Solecitto</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dan Walk</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bobby Brooks</td>
<td>Northland Capital Markets</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Scialla</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Devin McDermott</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Blum</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bobby Brooks</td>
<td>Northland Capital Markets</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Excelerate Energy. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Excelerate Energy compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Excelerate Energy's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Excelerate Energy's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/EE/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Excelerate Energy analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Discovering Excelerate Energy: A Closer Look</h2>
Excelerate Energy Inc is engaged in flexible LNG solutions, providing integrated services along the LNG value chain. The company offers a full range of flexible regasification services from FSRUs to infrastructure development, to LNG and natural gas supply.
<h3>Excelerate Energy: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Falling below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a reduced size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining Excelerate Energy's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -29.79% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Net Margin: Excelerate Energy's net margin is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 4.63%, the company may encounter challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Excelerate Energy's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 1.79%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Excelerate Energy's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.31%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: Excelerate Energy's debt-to-equity ratio stands notably higher than the industry average, reaching 1.43. This indicates a heavier reliance on borrowed funds, raising concerns about financial leverage.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

What 8 Analyst Ratings Have To Say About Excelerate Energy

Roper Techs (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ROP#NASDAQ">ROP</a>) underwent analysis by 4 analysts in the last quarter, revealing a spectrum of viewpoints from bullish to bearish.
In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $576.0, a high estimate of $615.00, and a low estimate of $558.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 1.59% from the previous average price target of $567.00.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738324819_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Roper Techs. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Tusa</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$558.00</td>
<td>$539.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Giordano</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$615.00</td>
<td>$535.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Julian Mitchell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$562.00</td>
<td>$569.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Julian Mitchell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$569.00</td>
<td>$625.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Roper Techs. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Roper Techs compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Roper Techs's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Roper Techs's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ROP/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Roper Techs analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know Roper Techs Better</h2>
Roper Technologies is a diversified technology company that operates three segments: application software, network software, and technology enabled products. Roper acquires asset light, cash generative businesses and deploys excess cash to acquire further portfolio companies. The firm operates a highly decentralized model with portfolio company management holding autonomy and accountability for key operational decisions, and a small, centralized team overseeing capital deployment and providing executive coaching and reviewing strategic goals.
<h3>Roper Techs: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Roper Techs's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 12.87%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Roper Techs's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 20.85%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 2.01%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Roper Techs's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 1.2%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 0.45, Roper Techs adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

A Glimpse Into The Expert Outlook On Roper Techs Through 4 Analysts

Across the recent three months, 10 analysts have shared their insights on Paylocity Holding (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PCTY#NASDAQ">PCTY</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $222.9, a high estimate of $240.00, and a low estimate of $180.00. Observing a 7.68% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $207.00. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738324812_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Paylocity Holding is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Siti Panigrahi</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steven Enders</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$231.00</td>
<td>$214.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Berg</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Levine</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$228.00</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Siti Panigrahi</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Jester</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
<td>$203.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Samad Samana</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
<td>$215.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Levine</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
<td>$208.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Siti Panigrahi</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Berg</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Paylocity Holding. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Providing a comprehensive analysis, analysts offer qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Paylocity Holding compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts gauge the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Paylocity Holding's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Paylocity Holding's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PCTY/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Paylocity Holding analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Paylocity Holding's Background</h2>
Paylocity is a provider of payroll and human capital management solutions servicing small- to midsize clients in the United States. The company was founded in 1997 and targets businesses with 10-5,000 employees and services about 39,000 clients as of fiscal 2024. Alongside core payroll services, Paylocity offers HCM solutions such as time and attendance and recruiting software as well as workplace collaboration and communication tools.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Paylocity Holding's Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization: Boasting an elevated market capitalization, the company surpasses industry averages. This signals substantial size and strong market recognition.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining Paylocity Holding's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 30 September, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -12.5% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 10.87%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Paylocity Holding's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 3.23%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 0.83%, the company showcases effective utilization of assets.
Debt Management: Paylocity Holding's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average at 0.34, reflecting a lower dependency on debt financing and a more conservative financial approach.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PCTY

Demystifying Paylocity Holding: Insights From 10 Analyst Reviews

Dividends

Church & Dwight Board Declares A 4% Increase In The Quarterly Dividend From $0.28375 To $0.295 Per Share

Truist Securities analyst Neal Dingmann downgrades Murphy Oil (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MUR#NYSE">MUR</a>) from Buy to Hold and lowers the price target from $42 to $31.

Downgrades

Price Target

Truist Securities Downgrades Murphy Oil to Hold, Lowers Price Target to $31

The Company expects organic sales growth to be within its long-term targeted range of 3% to 5%, including the impact of the planned exit from private label pet nutrition over the course of 2025.
On a GAAP basis, the Company expects gross profit margin expansion with advertising investment flat to up slightly on both a dollar basis and as a percent to sales and mid-single-digit earnings-per-share growth.
On a non-GAAP (Base Business) basis, the Company expects gross profit margin expansion with advertising investment flat to up slightly on both a dollar basis and as a percent to sales and low to mid-single-digit earnings-per-share growth.

Based On Current Spot Rates, Colgate-Palmolive Expects FY25 Net Sales To Be Roughly Flat, Including Mid-Single-Digit Negative Impact From Foreign Exchange

Church &amp; Dwight Co (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CHD#NYSE">CHD</a>) reported quarterly adjusted earnings of $0.77 per share which met the analyst consensus estimate. This is a 18.46 percent increase over earnings of $0.65 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $1.58 billion which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.56 billion by 1.12 percent. This is a 3.53 percent increase over sales of $1.53 billion the same period last year.

Church & Dwight Co Q4 Adj $0.77, Inline, Sales $1.58B Beat $1.56B Estimate

Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CL#NYSE">CL</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.91 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.89 by 2.25 percent. This is a 4.6 percent increase over earnings of $0.87 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $4.94 billion which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $4.98 billion by 0.71 percent. This is a 0.12 percent decrease over sales of $4.95 billion the same period last year.

Colgate-Palmolive Q4 2024 Adj EPS $0.91 Beats $0.89 Estimate, Sales $4.94B Miss $4.98B Estimate

As AI develops, a shift in expectations for electricity demand is becoming more evident. The emergence of Chinese artificial intelligence company DeepSeek has led to uncertainty about future electricity consumption, impacting <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/utilities">utility and power stocks. </a>



Investors in the traditional power and utilities sector are facing uncertainty after riding last year's wave of soaring demand projections. The rapid expansion of energy-intensive data centers—critical to AI and other tech innovations—had fueled a surge in power stocks. However, the question mark on this forecast has brought <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs">power-focused ETFs</a> back into the limelight for the wrong reasons. Although experts believe this is most likely a temporary panic, here are 3 ETFs that may be less sensitive to short-term chaos:



Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XLU#NYSE">XLU</a>) 



XLU provides exposure to major U.S. utility companies, including American Electric Power Co. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AEP#NASDAQ">AEP</a>) and Southern Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SO#NYSE">SO</a>). The ETF is a popular choice for investors seeking stable returns and dividend income from regulated utilities, which are less sensitive to short-term market disruptions. The expense ratio is 0.09%.



Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RSPU#NYSE">RSPU</a>)



Traditional utility ETFs are market-cap weighted. On the contrary, this ETF assigns equal weight to its holdings, which allows the investor to spread out risks. It includes companies involved in electricity production, transmission, and renewable energy, making it a potential hedge against volatility in the energy sector. The expense ratio is 0.4%.



First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GRID#NASDAQ">GRID</a>)



GRID focuses on companies engaged in smart grid technology, electrification infrastructure, and power transmission. As the U.S. accelerates its shift to renewable energy, investments in smart grids and electricity storage could benefit from long-term demand growth, regardless of AI-related fluctuations.



Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/sector-etfs/25/01/43350500/deepseek-shakes-up-ai-stocks-3-healthcare-tech-etfs-offer-stability-innovation">DeepSeek Shakes Up AI Stocks: 3 Healthcare Tech ETFs Offer Stability, Innovation</a>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The AI Revolution and Its Impact on Power Demand</h3>



The DeepSeek issue challenges long-standing projections about electricity demand driven by AI data centers. DeepSeek&#8217;s AI model, reportedly uses &#8220;10 to 40 times less energy&#8221; than similar U.S. models, according to a <a href="https://www.eenews.net/articles/game-changer-what-deepseek-ai-means-for-electricity/">report </a>by E&amp;E News. 



Utilities and natural gas companies, which had been soaring on expectations of rising AI-driven electricity demand, suffered steep losses. According to Reuters, independent power provider Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CEG#NASDAQ">CEG</a>) plunged by about 20%, Vistra (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VST#NYSE">VST</a>) dropped 30%, and Talen Energy (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TLN#NASDAQ">TLN</a>) fell 22% after news of DeepSeek&#8217;s advancements hit.



While some experts believe this could reset expectations for power growth, others argue that broader electrification trends, including U.S. manufacturing expansion and cryptocurrency mining, will keep electricity demand high. 



&#8220;Overall electricity demand is still going to surge because other major drivers — particularly U.S. manufacturing and cryptocurrency — are not going to be affected by DeepSeek,&#8221; said Betsy Soehren Jones, managing director at West Monroe, as reported by E&amp;E News.



DeepSeek&#8217;s accomplishment could even cast doubt on nuclear power demand, which tech companies see as a key source of clean energy for AI development. Investors have expected high premiums for nuclear power, over $100/MWh, but new efficiency gains may change that, Jefferies said in a client note, <a href="https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2652323-deepseek-undermines-ai-power-demand-forecasts">according </a>to Argus Media. 



Lower AI data center power demand could also weaken support for next-generation small modular reactors (SMRs), backed by companies like Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>) (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>) and Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>).



Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/25/01/43267966/deepseeks-low-cost-model-reshapes-ai-landscape-experts-predict-shift-to-application-layer">DeepSeek&#8217;s Low-Cost Model Reshapes AI Landscape: Experts Predict Shift To &#8216;Application Layer&#8217;</a>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What BofA Says About the Power and Utility Sector</h3>



A recent Bank of America (BofA) report suggests that the power and utility sector remains resilient despite the short-term market reaction to DeepSeek&#8217;s AI model. The report maintains a Buy rating on Constellation Energy with a revised price target of $366 and a Neutral rating on Vistra with a target of $183.



BofA analysts see the sell-off as an overreaction and expect data center demand to stay strong once the turbulence subsides.



The report describes DeepSeek as "more evolutionary than revolutionary" and that AI-driven data centers will continue to drive power consumption.



Additionally, BofA notes that supply and demand pressures in the energy market remain tight due to industrial expansion and electrification. The need for stable energy sources like nuclear power remains essential.



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Will DeepSeek Really Change The Power Scenario?</h3>



While DeepSeek's AI model has introduced uncertainty in the short term, some analysts believe the sell-off in power stocks may be &#8220;short-sighted and short-lived,&#8221; as energy economist Ed Hirs noted, per a Reuters report. Even with more efficient AI models, demand for electricity is likely to rise due to continued digitalization and electrification.



All said, despite the sharp reaction in the market, broader trends in electrification and technology-driven growth suggest that electricity consumption will keep rising.



Read Next: 



<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/global/25/01/43315374/ai-etfs-in-focus-as-alibaba-challenges-deepseek-with-new-model">AI ETFs In Focus As Alibaba Challenges DeepSeek With New Model</a></li>
</ul>



Photo: Sundry Photography/ Shutterstock.com

If you&#39;re interested in broad exposure to the Utilities - Broad segment of the equity market, look no further than the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RSPU#NYSE">RSPU</a>), a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on 11/01/2006.

Retail and institutional investors increasingly turn to passively managed ETFs because they offer low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency; these kind of funds are also excellent vehicles for long term investors.

Sector ETFs are also funds of convenience, offering many ways to gain low risk and diversified exposure to a broad group of companies in particular sectors. Utilities - Broad is one of the 16 broad Zacks sectors within the Zacks Industry classification. It is currently ranked 2, placing it in top 13%.

Index Details

The fund is sponsored by Invesco. It has amassed assets over $266.75 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the performance of the Utilities - Broad segment of the equity market. RSPU seeks to match the performance of the SP 500 EQUAL WEIGHT TELECM-UTILITY INDEX before fees and expenses.

The S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Telecommunication Services &amp; Utilities Index equally weights stocks found in the utilities and telecommunication services sectors of the S&amp;P 500 Index.

Costs

When considering an ETF&#39;s total return, expense ratios are an important factor, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive counterparts in the long term if all other factors remain equal.

Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.40%, making it one of the cheaper products in the space.

It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.79%.

Sector Exposure and Top Holdings

ETFs offer a diversified exposure and thus minimize single stock risk but it is still important to delve into a fund&#39;s holdings before investing. Most ETFs are very transparent products and many disclose their holdings on a daily basis.

This ETF has heaviest allocation in the Utilities sector--about 100% of the portfolio.

Looking at individual holdings, NRG Energy Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NRG#NYSE">NRG</a>) accounts for about 4% of total assets, followed by Constellation Energy Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CEG#NASDAQ">CEG</a>)&nbsp;and NextEra Energy Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NEE#NYSE">NEE</a>).

The top 10 holdings account for about 35.48% of total assets under management.

Performance and Risk

So far this year, RSPU return is roughly 7.80%, and is up about 6.02% in the last one year (as of 07/08/2024). During this past 52-week period, the fund has traded between $48.19 and $61.82.

The ETF has a beta of 0.62 and standard deviation of 17.67% for the trailing three-year period. With about 33 holdings, it has more concentrated exposure than peers.

Alternatives

Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, RSPU is a sufficient option for those seeking exposure to the Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.

Vanguard Utilities ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VPU#NYSE">VPU</a>) tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index and the Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XLU#NYSE">XLU</a>) tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Vanguard Utilities ETF has $5.49 billion in assets, Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF has $13.91 billion. VPU has an expense ratio of 0.10% and XLU charges 0.09%.

<a href="https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/2297702/should-you-invest-in-the-invesco-s-p-500-equal-weight-utilities-etf-rspu?cid=CS-BENZ-FT-sector_etf-2297702">To read this article on Zacks.com click here.</a>

Comments

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF

News

Latest news for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (ARCA:RSPU)

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Monday, July 08, 2024

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga