Option chain shows key data for RVL Pharmaceuticals's stock options at various strike prices and expiration dates. Traders use this information to analyze potential trades and assess market sentiment for RVL Pharmaceuticals.

RVL Pharmaceuticals (OTC:RVLPQ) Stock, Option Chain

RVL Pharmaceuticals PLC is a pharmaceutical company focused on the commercialization and development of products that target markets with underserved patient populations in the ocular medicine and medical aesthetics therapeutic areas. Its revenues consist of product sales, royalty revenues and licensing revenue.

RVL PHARMACEUTICALS PLC by RVL Pharmaceuticals plc

RVL Pharmaceuticals PLC

Wells Fargo analyst Roger Read maintains Valero Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VLO#NYSE">VLO</a>) with a Overweight and lowers the price target from $160 to $159.

News

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Wells Fargo Maintains Overweight on Valero Energy, Lowers Price Target to $159

AbbVie Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ABBV#NYSE">ABBV</a>) shares are trading higher on Friday. The company reported fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $2.16,<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/01/n43382026/abbvie-reports-full-year-and-fourth-quarter-2024-financial-results" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> beating the street view of $2.11.</a> 
Quarterly sales of $15.102 billion, outpacing the analyst consensus estimate of $14.827 billion. Revenues soared 5.6% on a reported basis, or 6.1% on an operational basis.
Global net revenues from the immunology portfolio were&nbsp;$7.294 billion, an increase of 5.3% on an operational basis.
Humira net revenues decreased 48.7% on an operational basis to $1.682 billion, Skyrizi net revenues rose 57.9% to $3.778 billion, and&nbsp;Rinvoq revenues gained 47.1% to $1.834 billion.
&#8220;We are entering 2025 with significant momentum and expect net revenues to exceed their previous peak in just the second full year following the U.S. Humira loss of exclusivity,&#8221; said&nbsp;Robert A. Michael, chief executive officer, AbbVie.
Also Read: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43382627/chevron-falls-as-q4-profits-decline-amid-lower-oil-output-dividend-hike-offers-silver-lining" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chevron Q4 Earnings: Profits Decline Amid Lower Oil Output, Dividend Hike Offers Silver Lining</a>
Global net revenues from the oncology portfolio were&nbsp;$1.691 billion, an increase of 12.9% on an operational basis.
Imbruvica net revenues were&nbsp;$848 million, a decrease of 6.2%, Venclexta net revenues were&nbsp;$655 million, an increase of 13% on an operational basis, and Global&nbsp;Elahere net revenues were&nbsp;$148 million.
Global net revenues from the neuroscience portfolio were&nbsp;$2.509 billion, an increase of 19.8% on a reported basis or 19.9% on an operational basis.
Botox Therapeutic net revenues were&nbsp;$873 million, an increase of 13% on an operational basis, Vraylar net revenues were&nbsp;$924 million, an increase of 17.1%, Ubrelvy net revenues were&nbsp;$303 million, an increase of 29.6%, and&nbsp;Qulipta net revenues were&nbsp;$201 million, an increase of 76.2% on an operational basis.
Outlook: AbbVie sees FY25 adjusted EPS of $12.12 &#8211; $12.32 <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/guidance">versus the street view of $12.18.</a>
AbbVie is reaffirming its expectations for a high single-digit compound annual revenue growth rate through 2029.&nbsp;
AbbVie is increasing its 2027 revenue forecast for Skyrizi and Rinvoq to over $31 billion, up $4 billion from the previous guidance. This includes over $20 billion for Skyrizi and over $11 billion for Rinvoq.
AbbVie is also updating its outlook for aesthetics revenues. The company now expects a high single-digit compound annual revenue growth rate for aesthetics through 2029.
Price Action: ABBV shares are trading higher by 7.87% to $189.47 at last check Friday.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43308041/chevron-ge-vernova-engine-no-1-bet-big-on-ai-power-but-is-it-too-late" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chevron, GE Vernova Bet Big On AI Power: Data Centers To Consume Enough Natural Gas To Power 3.5 Million Homes</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Formatoriginal/Shutterstock.com.

Earnings

Equities

Guidance

Markets

Movers

General

ABBV

AbbVie Jumps After Q4 Earnings Beat, Skyrizi And Rinvoq Boom Offsets Humira Decline

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>50.14</td>
<td>9.52</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>6.19%</td>
<td>$32.08</td>
<td>$31.0</td>
<td>11.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>21.17</td>
<td>1.86</td>
<td>1.92</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
<td>$54.02</td>
<td>$92.47</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>11.38</td>
<td>4.17</td>
<td>3.31</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>69.08</td>
<td>24.67</td>
<td>5.40</td>
<td>10.37%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>35.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>13.62</td>
<td>1.95</td>
<td>0.43</td>
<td>5.22%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>41.48</td>
<td>10.13</td>
<td>1.47</td>
<td>1.74%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>17.01</td>
<td>5.97</td>
<td>3.36</td>
<td>11.59%</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.14</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>0.54</td>
<td>2.76%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>-9.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>12.15</td>
<td>3.82</td>
<td>1.14</td>
<td>6.37%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>-3.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>23.83</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>3.89</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>33.60</td>
<td>4.28</td>
<td>3.10</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>25.85</td>
<td>1.06</td>
<td>0.19</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>15.34</td>
<td>4.05</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>24.52</td>
<td>4.17</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>5.09%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>6.05</td>
<td>0.39</td>
<td>0.09</td>
<td>0.58%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>-8.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groupon Inc</td>
<td>15.22</td>
<td>10.44</td>
<td>0.78</td>
<td>34.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-9.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>22.5</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>1.81</td>
<td>7.12%</td>
<td>$6.98</td>
<td>$14.45</td>
<td>7.92%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When closely examining Amazon.com, the following trends emerge: 
<ul>
<li>
The current Price to Earnings ratio of 50.14 is 2.23x higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 9.52, which is 1.7x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 4.04, surpassing the industry average by 2.23x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.19% that is 0.93% below the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.08 Billion, which is 4.6x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $31.0 Billion is 2.15x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 11.04%, which surpasses the industry average of 7.92%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335649_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Amazon.com in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
Amazon.com exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector, as indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive aspect for investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. The low ROE suggests that Amazon.com is not generating significant returns on shareholder equity. However, the high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth show that the company is performing well in terms of operational efficiency and revenue generation compared to its industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

AMZN

In-Depth Analysis: Amazon.com Versus Competitors In Broadline Retail Industry

Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bearish stance on SoFi Techs.
Looking at options history for SoFi Techs (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SOFI#NASDAQ">SOFI</a>) we detected 8 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 25% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 75% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 3 are puts, for a total amount of $100,190 and 5, calls, for a total amount of $218,771.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $5.0 to $20.0 for SoFi Techs over the recent three months. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Trends</h3>
Assessing the volume and open interest is a strategic step in options trading. These metrics shed light on the liquidity and investor interest in SoFi Techs's options at specified strike prices. The forthcoming data visualizes the fluctuation in volume and open interest for both calls and puts, linked to SoFi Techs's substantial trades, within a strike price spectrum from $5.0 to $20.0 over the preceding 30 days.
<h3>SoFi Techs 30-Day Option Volume &amp; Interest Snapshot</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335640_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Noteworthy Options Activity:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>SOFI</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$4.05</td>
<td>$3.7</td>
<td>$3.75</td>
<td>$13.00</td>
<td>$88.8K</td>
<td>9.9K</td>
<td>237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SOFI</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>02/07/25</td>
<td>$0.47</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$16.50</td>
<td>$47.4K</td>
<td>6.9K</td>
<td>3.3K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SOFI</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$2.59</td>
<td>$2.46</td>
<td>$2.59</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$44.0K</td>
<td>5.5K</td>
<td>170</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SOFI</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$1.91</td>
<td>$1.9</td>
<td>$1.91</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$30.5K</td>
<td>3.1K</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SOFI</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$3.1</td>
<td>$3.0</td>
<td>$3.0</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$30.0K</td>
<td>67.9K</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About SoFi Techs</h3>
SoFi is a financial-services company that was founded in 2011 and is based in San Francisco. Initially known for its student loan refinancing business, the company has expanded its product offerings to include personal loans, credit cards, mortgages, investment accounts, banking services, and financial planning. The company intends to be a one-stop shop for its clients' finances and operates solely through its mobile app and website. Through its acquisition of Galileo in 2020, the company also offers payment and account services for debit cards and digital banking.
In light of the recent options history for SoFi Techs, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>SoFi Techs's Current Market Status</h3>
<ul>
<li>Trading volume stands at 3,172,930, with SOFI's price down by -0.21%, positioned at $16.41.</li>
<li>RSI indicators show the stock to be may be approaching overbought.</li>
<li>Earnings announcement expected in 87 days.</li>
</ul>
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
Trading options involves greater risks but also offers the potential for higher profits. Savvy traders mitigate these risks through ongoing education, strategic trade adjustments, utilizing various indicators, and staying attuned to market dynamics. Keep up with the latest options trades for SoFi Techs with <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a> for real-time alerts.

Options

SOFI

Check Out What Whales Are Doing With SOFI

In the dynamic and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) and its primary competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>28.79</td>
<td>9.53</td>
<td>10.92</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>26.64</td>
<td>7.83</td>
<td>7.39</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>12.51</td>
<td>0.93</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>102.91</td>
<td>7.69</td>
<td>6.59</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>34.62</td>
<td>3.30</td>
<td>7.13</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>349</td>
<td>2.15</td>
<td>3.20</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>24.69</td>
<td>3.60</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>7.08</td>
<td>0.70</td>
<td>1.53</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>67.23</td>
<td>2.58</td>
<td>1.43</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>13.96</td>
<td>0.47</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>40.30</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>67.89</td>
<td>3.06</td>
<td>3.42</td>
<td>2.89%</td>
<td>$4.58</td>
<td>$7.32</td>
<td>5.74%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon closer analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 28.79 significantly below the industry average by 0.42x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 9.53, which is 3.11x the industry average, Meta Platforms might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 10.92, surpassing the industry average by 3.19x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.0% is 9.11% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion is 4.82x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 4.54x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 19.21% exceeds the industry average of 5.74%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335639_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Meta Platforms can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the company may be overvalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. However, its high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong financial performance relative to industry standards.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Industry Comparison: Evaluating Meta Platforms Against Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

Deep-pocketed investors have adopted a bearish approach towards Nu Holdings (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NU#NYSE">NU</a>), and it's something market players shouldn't ignore. Our tracking of public options records at Benzinga unveiled this significant move today. The identity of these investors remains unknown, but such a substantial move in NU usually suggests something big is about to happen.
We gleaned this information from our observations today when Benzinga's options scanner highlighted 8 extraordinary options activities for Nu Holdings. This level of activity is out of the ordinary.
The general mood among these heavyweight investors is divided, with 25% leaning bullish and 62% bearish. Among these notable options, 2 are puts, totaling $145,995, and 6 are calls, amounting to $246,960.
<h3>Expected Price Movements</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $6.0 to $17.0 for Nu Holdings over the recent three months. 
<h3>Insights into Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Assessing the volume and open interest is a strategic step in options trading. These metrics shed light on the liquidity and investor interest in Nu Holdings's options at specified strike prices. The forthcoming data visualizes the fluctuation in volume and open interest for both calls and puts, linked to Nu Holdings's substantial trades, within a strike price spectrum from $6.0 to $17.0 over the preceding 30 days.
<h3>Nu Holdings 30-Day Option Volume &amp; Interest Snapshot</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335634_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Significant Options Trades Detected:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>08/15/25</td>
<td>$4.1</td>
<td>$4.0</td>
<td>$4.1</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$118.5K</td>
<td>336</td>
<td>290</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$2.65</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>$2.5</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$50.0K</td>
<td>19.2K</td>
<td>200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$14.50</td>
<td>$47.2K</td>
<td>1.4K</td>
<td>1.8K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$4.5</td>
<td>$4.45</td>
<td>$4.5</td>
<td>$10.00</td>
<td>$45.0K</td>
<td>31.5K</td>
<td>130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$7.55</td>
<td>$7.5</td>
<td>$7.5</td>
<td>$6.00</td>
<td>$37.5K</td>
<td>258</td>
<td>50</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Nu Holdings</h3>
Nu Holdings Ltd is engaged in providing digital banking services. It offers several financial services such as Credit cards, Personal Account, Investments, Personal Loans, Insurance, Mobile payments, Business Accounts, and Rewards. The company earns the majority of its revenue in Brazil.
In light of the recent options history for Nu Holdings, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>Current Position of Nu Holdings</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 3,019,991, the NU's price is down by -0.89%, now at $13.32. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently may be overbought.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 20 days.</li>
</ul>
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>.
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for Nu Holdings, <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

Smart Money Is Betting Big In Nu Holdings Options

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is imperative for investors and industry observers to carefully assess companies before making investment choices. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) vis-à-vis its key competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. Through a detailed analysis of important financial indicators, market standing, and growth potential, our goal is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>39.08</td>
<td>62.74</td>
<td>9.36</td>
<td>23.83%</td>
<td>$32.5</td>
<td>$43.88</td>
<td>6.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>0.94</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>$2.61</td>
<td>15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>22.55</td>
<td>27.91</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>19.01</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>1.44</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>$0.86</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>175.33</td>
<td>15.81</td>
<td>7.92</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>8.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>14.26</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>1.15</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>10.06</td>
<td>0.58</td>
<td>0.61</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>56.90</td>
<td>3.48</td>
<td>1.05</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>22.57</td>
<td>0.94</td>
<td>0.57</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>41.46</td>
<td>6.85</td>
<td>2.21</td>
<td>7.43%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>17.11%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through an analysis of Apple, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 39.08 is 0.94x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 62.74 which exceeds the industry average by 9.16x.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.36, surpassing the industry average by 4.24x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.83% is 16.4% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.5 Billion, which is 79.27x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $43.88 Billion, which indicates 53.51x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 6.07%, which is much lower than the industry average of 17.11%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335630_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Apple in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
Apple holds a middle position in terms of the debt-to-equity ratio compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates a balanced financial structure with a moderate level of debt and an appropriate reliance on equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.87.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, despite slower revenue growth. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, with room for potential growth in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Market Analysis: Apple And Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

High-rolling investors have positioned themselves bullish on Applied Mat (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMAT#NASDAQ">AMAT</a>), and it's important for retail traders to take note. 
\This activity came to our attention today through Benzinga's tracking of publicly available options data. The identities of these investors are uncertain, but such a significant move in AMAT often signals that someone has privileged information.
Today, Benzinga's options scanner spotted 8 options trades for Applied Mat. This is not a typical pattern.
The sentiment among these major traders is split, with 62% bullish and 37% bearish. Among all the options we identified, there was one put, amounting to $35,380, and 7 calls, totaling $457,538.
<h3>Expected Price Movements</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $170.0 to $230.0 for Applied Mat over the recent three months. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Development</h3>
Looking at the volume and open interest is a powerful move while trading options. This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Applied Mat's options for a given strike price. Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Applied Mat's whale trades within a strike price range from $170.0 to $230.0 in the last 30 days. 
<h3>Applied Mat 30-Day Option Volume &amp; Interest Snapshot</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335628_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Biggest Options Spotted:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>AMAT</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$38.55</td>
<td>$37.55</td>
<td>$38.5</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
<td>$127.0K</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMAT</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$8.85</td>
<td>$8.6</td>
<td>$8.85</td>
<td>$182.50</td>
<td>$88.5K</td>
<td>374</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMAT</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$210.00</td>
<td>$67.2K</td>
<td>2.1K</td>
<td>1.2K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMAT</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$7.3</td>
<td>$7.1</td>
<td>$7.25</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$58.0K</td>
<td>1.1K</td>
<td>82</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMAT</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>02/21/25</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.0</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$210.00</td>
<td>$44.0K</td>
<td>2.1K</td>
<td>116</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Applied Mat</h3>
Applied Materials Inc is the largest semiconductor wafer fabrication equipment, or WFE, manufacturer in the world. Applied Materials has a broad portfolio spanning nearly every corner of the WFE ecosystem. Specifically, Applied Materials holds a market share leadership position in deposition, which entails the layering of new materials on semiconductor wafers. It is more exposed to general-purpose logic chips made at integrated device manufacturers and foundries. It counts the largest chipmakers in the world as customers, including TSMC, Intel, and Samsung.
After a thorough review of the options trading surrounding Applied Mat, we move to examine the company in more detail. This includes an assessment of its current market status and performance.
<h3>Where Is Applied Mat Standing Right Now?</h3>
<ul>
<li>Trading volume stands at 386,150, with AMAT's price up by 0.75%, positioned at $183.09.</li>
<li>RSI indicators show the stock to be may be approaching overbought.</li>
<li>Earnings announcement expected in 13 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What The Experts Say On Applied Mat</h3>
5 market experts have recently issued ratings for this stock, with a consensus target price of $200.0.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;utm_source=benzinga-insights">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Wells Fargo keeps a Overweight rating on Applied Mat with a target price of $200. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Barclays persists with their Equal-Weight rating on Applied Mat, maintaining a target price of $200. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Keybanc has elevated its stance to Overweight, setting a new price target at $225. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Mizuho has decided to maintain their Outperform rating on Applied Mat, which currently sits at a price target of $210. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Susquehanna keeps a Neutral rating on Applied Mat with a target price of $165. 
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for Applied Mat, <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

AMAT

This Is What Whales Are Betting On Applied Mat

Guggenheim analyst Joseph Osha upgrades Enphase Energy (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ENPH#NASDAQ">ENPH</a>) from Sell to Neutral and maintains the price target from $62 to $62.

Upgrades

ENPH

Guggenheim Upgrades Enphase Energy to Neutral, Maintains Price Target to $62

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>33.44</td>
<td>10.19</td>
<td>11.84</td>
<td>8.17%</td>
<td>$36.79</td>
<td>$47.83</td>
<td>12.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>41.66</td>
<td>34.67</td>
<td>8.82</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>148.06</td>
<td>21.76</td>
<td>19.22</td>
<td>4.06%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>48.62</td>
<td>20.80</td>
<td>16.06</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>778.18</td>
<td>31.97</td>
<td>26.53</td>
<td>-0.57%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>28.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>50.72</td>
<td>85.19</td>
<td>13.63</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>28.17</td>
<td>8.19</td>
<td>4.56</td>
<td>7.92%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>3.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>562.47</td>
<td>12.42</td>
<td>13.71</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>32.34</td>
<td>3.33</td>
<td>6.46</td>
<td>2.72%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>17.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>41.55</td>
<td>24.13</td>
<td>7.56</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>21.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>23.54</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>21.45</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>30.85</td>
<td>11.37</td>
<td>8.85</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>38.13</td>
<td>24.81</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>68.09</td>
<td>1.87</td>
<td>3.27</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>37.01</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>3.36</td>
<td>0.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>21.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>137.81</td>
<td>20.52</td>
<td>11.09</td>
<td>13.04%</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>$1.29</td>
<td>12.68%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting a comprehensive analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 33.44, which is 0.24x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 10.19, which is 0.5x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.84, which is 1.07x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.17%, which is 4.87% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.79 Billion, which is 61.32x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $47.83 Billion is 37.08x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 12.27% compared to the industry average of 12.68%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335621_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Microsoft stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, Microsoft is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the stock is undervalued compared to peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies the stock may be overvalued based on revenue. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit, Microsoft shows strong performance, indicating efficient operations and profitability. The low revenue growth rate may be a concern for future prospects compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Inquiry Into Microsoft's Competitor Dynamics In Software Industry

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>49.21</td>
<td>46.32</td>
<td>27.36</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>30.27</td>
<td>8.28</td>
<td>12.27</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$596.09</td>
<td>$512.38</td>
<td>38.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>167.18</td>
<td>14.94</td>
<td>19.98</td>
<td>6.49%</td>
<td>$7.29</td>
<td>$9.0</td>
<td>51.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>105.19</td>
<td>3.38</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>19.23</td>
<td>7.23</td>
<td>4.99</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>35.63</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>10.89</td>
<td>7.05%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-3.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>253.32</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>46.06</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>64.76</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>11.24</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>-10.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>26.50</td>
<td>2.20</td>
<td>3.57</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>71.79</td>
<td>13.21</td>
<td>15.28</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>38.31</td>
<td>4.72</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>13.22</td>
<td>2.64</td>
<td>3.14</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>20.32</td>
<td>2.33</td>
<td>1.22</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>9.27</td>
<td>1.15</td>
<td>1.49</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>-26.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>14.42</td>
<td>2.36</td>
<td>4.67</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>9.35</td>
<td>1.31</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>24.23</td>
<td>2.27</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>125.83</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>13.20</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>55.62</td>
<td>11.13</td>
<td>13.97</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>299</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>2.12</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-14.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>30.40</td>
<td>4.53</td>
<td>11.20</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>70.69</td>
<td>6.62</td>
<td>9.71</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$33.84</td>
<td>$29.51</td>
<td>7.12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When conducting a detailed analysis of NVIDIA, the following trends become clear: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 49.21 significantly below the industry average by 0.7x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 46.32 relative to the industry average by 7.0x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 27.36, which is 2.82x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% that is 27.2% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.68x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.89x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 93.61% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 7.12%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738335612_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
NVIDIA has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests NVIDIA is undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the market values the company's assets and sales more favorably. On the other hand, the high ROE and revenue growth, along with low EBITDA and gross profit, highlight potential for strong performance and expansion in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating NVIDIA And Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Wells Fargo analyst Roger Read maintains Liberty Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LBRT#NYSE">LBRT</a>) with a Overweight and lowers the price target from $24 to $22.

LBRT

Wells Fargo Maintains Overweight on Liberty Energy, Lowers Price Target to $22

Wells Fargo analyst Ike Boruchow maintains Deckers Outdoor (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DECK#NYSE">DECK</a>) with a Equal-Weight and lowers the price target from $215 to $210.

DECK

Wells Fargo Maintains Equal-Weight on Deckers Outdoor, Lowers Price Target to $210

Scotiabank analyst Greg Harrison maintains Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VRTX#NASDAQ">VRTX</a>) with a Sector Perform and raises the price target from $430 to $433.

VRTX

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Raises Price Target to $433

Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods Says Yellowtail Project In Guyana Could Start By Q3 2025; Says Major Planned Projects For 2025 Could Begin Ahead Of Schedule

Scotiabank analyst Nick Altmann maintains Atlassian (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TEAM#NASDAQ">TEAM</a>) with a Sector Perform and raises the price target from $250 to $330.

TEAM

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Atlassian, Raises Price Target to $330

Scotiabank analyst Cameron Bean maintains Spartan Delta (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SDE#TSX">SDE</a>) with a Sector Outperform and raises the price target from C$6 to C$7.5.

TSX:SDE

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Spartan Delta, Raises Price Target to C$7.5

Macro Economic Events

Economics

CORRECTION: Chicago PMI For Jan. 39.5 Vs 40.3 Est.; 36.9 Prior

Looking into the current session, Simon Property Group Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPG#NYSE">SPG</a>) shares are trading at $175.53, after a 0.15% drop. Over the past month, the stock fell by 0.05%, but over the past year, it actually increased by 28.65%. With questionable short-term performance like this, and great long-term performance, long-term shareholders might want to start looking into the company's price-to-earnings ratio. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738334832_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>A Look at Simon Property Group P/E Relative to Its Competitors</h3>
The P/E ratio measures the current share price to the company's EPS. It is used by long-term investors to analyze the company's current performance against it's past earnings, historical data and aggregate market data for the industry or the indices, such as S&amp;P 500. A higher P/E indicates that investors expect the company to perform better in the future, and the stock is probably overvalued, but not necessarily. It also could indicate that investors are willing to pay a higher share price currently, because they expect the company to perform better in the upcoming quarters. This leads investors to also remain optimistic about rising dividends in the future. 
Simon Property Group has a lower P/E than the aggregate P/E of 71.93 of the Retail REITs industry. Ideally, one might believe that the stock might perform worse than its peers, but it's also probable that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1738334832_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In summary, while the price-to-earnings ratio is a valuable tool for investors to evaluate a company's market performance, it should be used with caution. A low P/E ratio can be an indication of undervaluation, but it can also suggest weak growth prospects or financial instability. Moreover, the P/E ratio is just one of many metrics that investors should consider when making investment decisions, and it should be evaluated alongside other financial ratios, industry trends, and qualitative factors. By taking a comprehensive approach to analyzing a company's financial health, investors can make well-informed decisions that are more likely to lead to successful outcomes.

Intraday Update

Price Over Earnings Overview: Simon Property Group

U.S. stocks traded higher this morning, with the Nasdaq Composite gaining more than 150 points on Friday.
Following the market opening Friday, the Dow traded up 0.19% to 44,968.22 while the NASDAQ climbed 0.84% to 19,847.18. The S&amp;P 500 also rose, gaining, 0.41% to 6,095.78.
Check This Out: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43388778/jim-cramer-autozone-is-a-great-stock-recommends-buying-this-energy-stock">Jim Cramer: AutoZone Is A &#8216;Great&#8217; Stock, Recommends Buying This Energy Stock</a>
Leading and Lagging Sectors Communication services shares surged by 0.8% on Friday.
In trading on Friday, energy shares fell by 1.4%.
Top Headline
Apple Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) reported better-than-expected first-quarter financial results after the market close on Thursday.
Apple reported fiscal first-quarter revenue of $124.3 billion, beating analyst estimates of $124.13 billion. The iPhone maker reported first-quarter adjusted earnings of $2.40 per share, beating analyst estimates of $2.36 per share. However, sales of its iPhone handset device declined to $69.14 billion from $69.70 billion in the year-ago period.
Equities Trading UP &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<ul>
<li>TCTM Kids IT Education Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TCTM#NASDAQ">TCTM</a>) shares shot up 187% to $0.5197.</li>
<li>Shares of Signing Day Sports, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SGN#NYSE">SGN</a>)got a boost, surging 70% to $4.34 after the company announced it retains rights as the National Recruiting Partner to the U.S. Army Bowl through 2026 in new deal.</li>
<li>NLS Pharmaceutics AG (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NLSP#NASDAQ">NLSP</a>) shares were also up, gaining 45% to $2.85 after announcing its merger with Kadimastem has been approved by shareholders.</li>
</ul>
Equities Trading DOWN
<ul>
<li>Enveric Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ENVB#NASDAQ">ENVB</a>) shares dropped 45% to $2.16 after the company announced a $5 million public offering of 1.67 million units of common stock.</li>
<li>Shares of NewGenIvf Group Limited (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NIVF#NASDAQ">NIVF</a>) were down 40% to $0.1554 after the company announced a 1-for-20 reverse stock split.</li>
<li>Benson Hill, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BHIL#NASDAQ">BHIL</a>) was down, falling 34% to $2.62. Benson Hill recently announced results from a controlled broiler feeding trial conducted with Tyson Foods.</li>
</ul>
Commodities In commodity news, oil traded up 0.1% to $72.76 while gold traded up 0.2% at $2,850.80.
Silver traded up 0.5% to $32.64 on Friday, while copper fell 1% to $4.2665.
Euro zone
European shares were mostly higher today. The eurozone's STOXX 600 rose 0.3%, Germany's DAX 40 gained 0.2% and France's CAC 40 climbed 0.3%. Spain's IBEX 35 Index fell 0.1%, while London's FTSE 100 rose 0.4%.
Asia Pacific Markets
Asian markets closed higher on Friday, with Japan's Nikkei 225 gaining 0.15% and India's BSE Sensex gaining 0.97%.
Economics
<ul>
<li>U.S. personal income increased 0.4% month-over-month in December compared to a 0.3% gain in November.</li>
<li>Personal spending climbed by 0.7% month-over-month to an annualized rate of $20.387 trillion in December.</li>
<li>The core PCE price index in the US increased by 0.2% from the previous month for December.</li>
</ul>
Now Read This: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43390127/wall-streets-most-accurate-analysts-give-their-take-on-3-energy-stocks-delivering-high-dividend-yields">Wall Street&#8217;s Most Accurate Analysts Give Their Take On 3 Energy Stocks Delivering High-Dividend Yields</a></li>
</ul>

Comments

RVL Pharmaceuticals

RVL Pharmaceuticals (RVLPQ) Options

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga