Zinger Key Points
- Mark Meadows is seeking to move Trump's trial to federal court, citing supremacy clause immunity.
- Federal court move would allow Trump a self-pardon if re-elected in 2024; critics cry foul.
- Discover Fast-Growing Stocks Every Month
Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is making a legal bid to move the case to federal court.
The hearing, slated to take place in Atlanta on Monday, Aug. 28, marks a pivotal moment for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s prosecution against former President Donald Trump. It is the first instance that opens up the floor for arguments from both sides before a judge.
Meadows’ seeks to transfer the case from Georgia’s state court system, according to Politico. Since Meadows was a federal official at the time, he argues that he’s immune from state-level charges, relying on the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.
His argument aligns with the controversial "unitary executive theory," arguing that state elections fall under federal purview.
Read Also: Monetizing The Mug: Trump Arrest Photo Encapsulates A Sharp Chapter In American History
Moving the case to federal court has implications beyond jurisdictional squabbles. Federal law would allow Trump, if elected President in 2024, to pardon himself, an option not available in state court. Besides, federal rules would apply, and some defendants might see advantages in a federal setting, as opposed to a more localized — and presumably less sympathetic — jury in Fulton County.
Meadows Is Not Immune, Critics Say
Critics argue that Meadows and others are not immune. The "Hatch Act," they say, prohibits federal employees from engaging in political activity as part of their official duties. Willis’ team maintains that Trump and his allies were acting politically, not in their official capacities.
As legal proceeding continue to develop, companies tied to Trump’s political fortunes, like Digital World Acquisition Corp DWAC, and the MAGA-oriented Point Bridge America First ETF MAGA could see volatility depending on the case’s trajectory.
Whatever the outcome, the hearing serves as a litmus test for what's to come in the legal tussles involving Trump and his allies, setting the stage for a landmark case that could redefine the balance between state and federal powers in prosecuting elected officials.
Read next: President Joe Biden Comments On Trump’s Mugshot… With A Compliment?
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.