Comparing ARM Holdings With Industry Competitors In Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies before making investment decisions. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating ARM Holdings ARM against its key competitors in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.

ARM Holdings Background

Arm Holdings is the IP owner and developer of the ARM architecture (ARM stands for Acorn RISC Machine), which is used in 99% of the world's smartphone CPU cores, and it also has high market share in other battery-powered devices like wearables, tablets, or sensors. Arm licenses its architecture for a fee, offering different types of licenses depending on the flexibility the customer needs. Customers like Apple or Qualcomm buy architectural licenses, which allows them to modify the architecture and add or delete instructions to tailor the chips to their specific needs. Other clients directly buy off-the-shelf designs from Arm. Both off-the-shelf and architectural customers pay a royalty fee per chip shipped.

By carefully studying ARM Holdings, we can deduce the following trends:

• The current Price to Earnings ratio of 373.7 is 4.17x higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.

• With a Price to Book ratio of 14.09, which is 1.86x the industry average, ARM Holdings might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.

• The Price to Sales ratio of 23.7, which is 2.86x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.

• The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of -2.45%, which is 9.83% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.

• With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $-120 Million, which is -0.01x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.

• With lower gross profit of $760 Million, which indicates 0.04x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.

• The company's revenue growth of 27.94% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 5.72%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.

Debt To Equity Ratio

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.

Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.

In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, ARM Holdings stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:

• ARM Holdings is in a relatively stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.04.

• This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity.

Key Takeaways

ARM Holdings has a high PE ratio, indicating that its stock price is relatively high compared to its earnings. The high PB ratio suggests that the stock is trading at a premium compared to its book value. The high PS ratio indicates that the stock is trading at a premium compared to its sales. The low ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest that ARM Holdings may be underperforming compared to its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry.

This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.