Comparative Study: Charter Communications And Industry Competitors In Media Industry

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Charter Communications CHTR in comparison to its major competitors within the Media industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.

Charter Communications Background

Charter is the product of the 2016 merger of three cable companies, each with a decades-long history in the business: Legacy Charter, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks. The firm now holds networks capable of providing television, internet access, and phone services to roughly 56 million U.S. homes and businesses, around 40% of the country. Across this footprint, Charter serves 30 million residential and 2 million commercial customer accounts under the Spectrum brand, making it the second-largest U.S. cable company behind Comcast. The firm also owns, in whole or in part, sports and news networks, including Spectrum SportsNet (long-term local rights to Los Angeles Lakers games), SportsNet LA (Los Angeles Dodgers), SportsNet New York (New York Mets), and Spectrum News NY1.

Company P/E P/B P/S ROE EBITDA (in billions) Gross Profit (in billions) Revenue Growth
Charter Communications Inc 12.03 4.91 1.03 11.64% $5.24 $5.29 0.25%
Comcast Corp 12 2.10 1.50 4.85% $10.02 $21.46 0.89%
Cable One Inc 38.29 1.69 1.95 2.21% $0.19 $0.31 -1.03%
Average 25.14 1.9 1.73 3.53% $5.1 $10.88 -0.07%

Upon closer analysis of Charter Communications, the following trends become apparent:

  • The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 12.03 is lower than the industry average by 0.48x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.

  • The elevated Price to Book ratio of 4.91 relative to the industry average by 2.58x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.

  • Based on its sales performance, the stock could be deemed undervalued with a Price to Sales ratio of 1.03, which is 0.6x the industry average.

  • With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 11.64% that is 8.11% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.

  • The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $5.24 Billion is 1.03x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.

  • The gross profit of $5.29 Billion is 0.49x below that of its industry, suggesting potential lower revenue after accounting for production costs.

  • With a revenue growth of 0.25%, which surpasses the industry average of -0.07%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.

Debt To Equity Ratio

debt to equity

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.

Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.

In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Charter Communications and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:

  • Compared to its top 4 peers, Charter Communications has a higher debt-to-equity ratio of 8.84, indicating a higher level of debt financing.

  • This higher debt proportion can expose the company to increased financial risk and potential challenges.

Key Takeaways

Charter Communications has a low PE ratio compared to its peers in the Media industry, indicating that the stock may be undervalued. The company also has a high PB ratio, suggesting that investors are willing to pay a premium for its book value. Additionally, Charter Communications has a low PS ratio, indicating that the stock is trading at a lower price relative to its sales. On the other hand, the company has a high ROE, EBITDA, and revenue growth, suggesting strong profitability and growth potential compared to its industry peers. However, the company's gross profit is relatively low, which may indicate lower profitability compared to its competitors.

This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
Posted In:
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!