'As Goes January, So Goes The Year' - Here's Why Investors Should Focus Elsewhere

Every January, traders and market enthusiasts look to the first month's performance as a potential crystal ball for the year ahead.

The ‘January Barometer’ and the ‘January Effect’—two staples of market lore—suggest that January holds predictive power over the entire year's stock market trajectory.

But while these ideas are catchy, investors may find more reliable gains by focusing elsewhere.

The January Effect And Barometer: A Closer Look

The January Effect refers to a historical trend where stocks tend to rise during the month of January. This phenomenon is often attributed to year-end tax-loss harvesting, where investors sell off losing positions in December to offset capital gains, only to reinvest at the start of the new year.

Meanwhile, the January Barometer, introduced by Yale Hirsch in 1972, takes a broader perspective. It suggests that the S&P 500's performance in January can serve as a predictor for the rest of the year.

The logic behind the January Barometer is simple, with the sentence "as goes January, so goes the year," frequently cited in financial circles.

According to Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, the January Barometer has proven accurate more often than not.

Data shows that between 1965 and 2024, January's performance matched the market's full-year direction in 42 out of 59 years, or about 71% of the time.

Moreover, January ranks as the fourth-best performing month for stocks historically, with an average gain of 1.2% since 1928.

Looking at a more recent history, in 2024, the S&P 500, as tracked by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY, posted a 1.6% gain in January and ended the year up by a strong 23.3%. In 2023, a spectacular 6.3% surge in January set the stage for a 24.4% annual rally, while in 2022, a sharp 6.3% drop in January foreshadowed a nearly 20% decline for the year.

On paper, these stats make January look significant. But are they truly actionable?

Flaws In January's Predictive Power

While intriguing, the January Barometer and Effect often rely on loose correlations rather than causal relationships.

Almost all months of the year, with the sole exclusion of September, tend to show historical gains simply because stock prices have a natural upward trend over time.

The January Effect, tied to tax-loss selling and reinvestment, also presents logical inconsistencies, as Yardeni highlighted.

If tax-loss selling depresses December's performance, how does December maintain its reputation for the so-called Santa Claus rallies? In fact, December outperforms January historically, with an average gain of 1.3% since 1928, making it the third-best month for stocks.

These contradictions highlight why traders should be cautious when relying on January-based strategies. Statistical quirks don't necessarily translate into consistent profits.

Look Beyond January

January's allure as a market bellwether often overshadows its true significance. Although the January Barometer and Effect have historical appeal, their predictive power is more coincidence than strategy.

“It is better simply to stay invested for the long run than to trade these two January statistical regularities,” Yardeni said.

While the January Barometer and Effect have historical merit, their predictive power pales in comparison to the benefits of long-term, fundamentals-based strategies.

Read now:

• This Key Bond Market Gauge Predicted Major Wall Street Crashes: Is 50% Drop Looming In 2025?

Image created by Tara Anand for Investopedia