In a bold move to reshape the American work culture, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced legislation in March 2024 to shorten the standard work week from 40 hours to 32 hours without any loss in pay. Known as the "Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act," the proposal is stirring debate across the political spectrum and among businesses nationwide.
"Moving to a 32-hour workweek with no loss of pay is not a radical idea," Sanders stated. "Today, American workers are over 400 percent more productive than they were in the 1940s. And yet, millions of Americans are working longer hours for lower wages than they were decades ago. That has got to change."
The Vermont Senator argues that technological advancements like artificial intelligence and automation have drastically boosted productivity, making shorter workweeks possible and necessary.
Don't Miss:
- The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement — How do you compare?
- Can you guess how many Americans successfully retire with $1,000,000 saved? The percentage may shock you.
"The financial gains from the major advancements in artificial intelligence, automation and new technology must benefit the working class, not just corporate CEOs and wealthy stockholders on Wall Street. It is time to reduce the stress level in our country and allow Americans to enjoy a better quality of life," Sanders added.
What the Proposal Entails
The bill, introduced in the Senate by Sanders and Senator Laphonza Butler (D-Calif.), along with a companion bill in the House by Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.), outlines the following key changes:
• Reduced Work Week: The standard work week would gradually drop from 40 to 32 hours over four years.
• Overtime Requirements: Employers must pay overtime for work beyond 32 hours per week. This includes:
• Time-and-a-half pay for workdays longer than eight but shorter than 12 hours.
• Double pay for workdays exceeding 12 hours.
• Pay Protections: Employers could not reduce salaries or benefits due to the shorter workweek.
The bill aims to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to implement these changes, potentially setting a new standard for American labor practices.
See Also: It’s no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $70 million in art — this alternative asset has outpaced the S&P 500 since 1995, delivering an average annual return of 11.4%. Here’s how everyday investors are getting started.
The Case for a Shorter Workweek
Proponents of the legislation argue that a shorter workweek would reflect the reality of increased worker productivity and improve quality of life. Studies from companies that have adopted four-day workweeks report benefits like:
• Higher efficiency.
• Increased employee satisfaction.
• Lower burnout and stress levels.
Sanders also emphasized the fairness of sharing technological gains with the workforce. "We're asking the question: Why should all the benefits of automation and AI go to the top 1%? Workers deserve to share in the productivity they help create," he said.
Criticism and Concerns
Not everyone is convinced. Opponents, particularly Republicans, argue that a mandated shorter workweek could:
• Harm Small Businesses: Many small businesses worry they may not be able to afford to pay full wages for reduced hours or cope with overtime demands.
• Increase Costs for Consumers: Critics predict that higher labor costs could raise prices for goods and services.
• Accelerate Job Automation: Some believe the legislation could incentivize companies to replace human labor with machines.
During a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee hearing – chaired by Sanders–Republicans preferred allowing businesses the flexibility to decide on workweek policies rather than imposing federal mandates.
Trending: Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they’re on pace — here’s a breakdown on what’s behind this formula.
The Political Road Ahead
As noted by Cupahr.org, while the proposal has sparked significant discussion, its chances of passing are slim in the current political climate. The bill faces:
Senate Filibuster: The legislation is unlikely to secure the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster in the Senate.
House Opposition: With Republicans holding the majority in the House, the bill would likely face stiff resistance there as well.
Regardless of its fate, Sanders' proposal is reigniting conversations about work-life balance, employee rights and the distribution of wealth in an increasingly automated economy. The notion of a 32-hour workweek reflects broader shifts in global labor practices, as countries like Iceland and companies across Europe experiment with reduced hours to boost productivity and well-being.
Read Next:
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.
