Two major federal buildings in San Francisco, including the one named after Nancy Pelosi, may soon be sold off as part of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal government's real estate footprint. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the administration is targeting these properties to cut costs—but critics argue this is more about political revenge than financial responsibility.
What's Happening?
The Nancy Pelosi Federal Building at 90 Seventh St. and the 50 United Nations Plaza building have been identified as "non-core" federal assets, meaning they could be sold off soon. The Chronicle reported that the properties are part of a broader plan to offload more than 500 federal buildings nationwide, spearheaded by Trump and billionaire ally Elon Musk.
Don't Miss:
- CEO of Integris gathered a team of senior investment managers who have $34.22 billion in combined owned and managed assets in the West Coast — here’s how to invest in their private credit fund that targets 12% annual interest rate.
- Many don’t know there are tax benefits when buying a unit as an investment — Here’s how to invest in real estate by mirroring BlackRock's big move
The administration claims this will save money by reducing maintenance costs and moving federal workers into leased office spaces. However, former Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier doesn't buy it. "It's another example of how he is coming after Democrats. He's coming after California, and it's all about payback," she told ABC7 Los Angeles.
Both buildings sit in San Francisco's struggling Mid-Market and Civic Center neighborhoods, which have long dealt with high vacancies, crime, and homelessness. The Pelosi building, in particular, has drawn Republican criticism, not just for its name but for the conditions around it.
In 2023, some federal employees were ordered to work from home due to safety concerns. That prompted Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) to call for the building's closure, comparing it to a "Halloween haunted house." Trump also took aim at the building's modernist design, reinstating his executive order favoring classical architecture over what he called "ugly" government buildings.
Trending: Coinbase’s latest promo gets you up to $200 in crypto (Seriously!) — Here's everything you need to know to take advantage of this offer.
Will It Actually Save Money?
Critics argue that selling these buildings could end up costing taxpayers more in the long run. Leasing office space means ongoing rent payments, and local real estate insiders told the Chronicle that consolidating federal employees in owned buildings is usually more cost-effective than renting.
Speier said that "the lease will keep going up and you will end up paying the property taxes of the lessor, whereas you don't pay federal taxes when you are a federal government." Some experts also note that it may be difficult to find buyers, given that Mid-Market's office vacancy rate is nearing 50%.
What's Next?
The timeline for the sales remains unclear, and the Chronicle reported that the General Services Administration has refused to confirm which buildings are officially on the chopping block. However, internal GSA documents indicate that the administration's goal is to cut the government's real estate footprint by 50% and the number of buildings by 70%.
Wondering if your investments can get you to a $5,000,000 nest egg? Speak to a financial advisor today. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you up with up to three vetted financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you.
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.