Zuckerberg's Global Push: Meta Faces Scrutiny Over Privacy, Free Speech, Regulatory Tactics

by Henry Khederian Benzinga Editor

Meta Platforms Inc’s META ambitious global expansion efforts have come under renewed scrutiny following explosive allegations from former executive Sarah Wynn-Williams.

What To Know: In a memoir titled “Careless People” and a whistleblower complaint filed with the SEC, Wynn-Williams claims Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg took extreme measures to attempt to break into the Chinese market while simultaneously engaging in controversial lobbying tactics in India.

In 2015, as part of its bid to operate in China, Facebook (now Meta) allegedly developed a country-specific censorship tool, proposing a "chief editor" to manage content and shut down discussions during politically sensitive periods.

According to Wynn-Williams' 78-page complaint, Meta was prepared to store Chinese user data locally, effectively granting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) greater surveillance capabilities over its citizens' online activity.

In a response to the publication, Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told The Washington Post that the company “ultimately opted not to go through with the ideas we’d explored,” and that this was “widely reported beginning a decade ago.” Additionally, Meta said the claims in the book were “false accusations,” adding that they were “out-of-date,” according to The New York Times.

While Meta ultimately abandoned its China plans, the company’s aggressive expansion strategy extended to India, where it fought to implement Free Basics—a program intended to offer limited free internet access but criticized for violating net neutrality.

Zuckerberg and top engineers allegedly invested months in lobbying efforts, mobilizing users to flood India's telecom regulator, TRAI, with 16 million support emails. However, a low-level TRAI official shut down the campaign by simply opting out of Facebook's messages, rendering the outreach effort ineffective.

What Else: The company's assertive strategies — including negotiations with various governments and efforts to shape public perception — have raised questions about its approach to free speech, privacy, and regulatory compliance.

These concerns come at a pivotal time, as Meta adjusts its policies amid evolving political dynamics, while Zuckerberg positions the company as a prominent player in American tech diplomacy.

Read Next: